Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Household preparedness is not ‘hazard agnostic’: a review of key preparedness advice from a mutli-hazard perspective 

View through CrossRef
This presentation introduces a database of household-level preparedness advice prescribed for 19 natural hazards, synthesised from authoritative sources. While preparedness is often assumed to be hazard-agnostic, we demonstrate that although many actions are effective across multiple hazards, some forms of preparedness may increase vulnerability or exposure to other hazards. These actions are termed asynergistic.The database is structured around 19 broad hazard types (e.g. earthquake, flood) and six overarching preparedness themes relevant at the household scale (e.g. household knowledge of past events, household subsistence). Within these themes, we identify 38 specific preparedness categories, such as structural design and food and water subsistence. Drawing on our recent review of the household preparedness literature, the database adopts a broad and inclusive interpretation of preparedness (e.g. accounting for gendered practices) and is designed to be applicable to majority-world, low-income contexts.Preparedness actions were compiled from key sources that households commonly consult, including government guidance and International and Regional Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (acknowledging that the review was not exhaustive). This resulted in a database of more than 490 recommended preparedness actions across the 19 hazards (including duplication across hazards).We find that many actions are shared across multiple hazards and can be considered synergistic (e.g. maintaining a three-day supply of food and water). Many actions are also not mutually exclusive, such as vegetation management and maintaining access to emergency cash, subject to time and resource constraints. However, a subset of actions are asynergistic, whereby preparation for one hazard may increase vulnerability to others, particularly when hazards occur simultaneously or in sequence. For example, sealing windows and doors to protect against gas-based hazards (e.g. volcanic eruptions, wildfires) may impede evacuation during an earthquake. We also identify more subtle tensions in seemingly synergistic actions, such as storing subsistence items upstairs to reduce flood damage, which may increase losses during wind-related hazards.We argue that this database can support the development of more nuanced, locally tailored preparedness advice when used alongside multi-hazard risk registers. More broadly, this work provides an evidence base that challenges assumptions of hazard-agnostic preparedness and highlights the need to explicitly consider synergies and asynergies in household risk reduction.
Title: Household preparedness is not ‘hazard agnostic’: a review of key preparedness advice from a mutli-hazard perspective 
Description:
This presentation introduces a database of household-level preparedness advice prescribed for 19 natural hazards, synthesised from authoritative sources.
While preparedness is often assumed to be hazard-agnostic, we demonstrate that although many actions are effective across multiple hazards, some forms of preparedness may increase vulnerability or exposure to other hazards.
These actions are termed asynergistic.
The database is structured around 19 broad hazard types (e.
g.
earthquake, flood) and six overarching preparedness themes relevant at the household scale (e.
g.
household knowledge of past events, household subsistence).
Within these themes, we identify 38 specific preparedness categories, such as structural design and food and water subsistence.
Drawing on our recent review of the household preparedness literature, the database adopts a broad and inclusive interpretation of preparedness (e.
g.
accounting for gendered practices) and is designed to be applicable to majority-world, low-income contexts.
Preparedness actions were compiled from key sources that households commonly consult, including government guidance and International and Regional Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (acknowledging that the review was not exhaustive).
This resulted in a database of more than 490 recommended preparedness actions across the 19 hazards (including duplication across hazards).
We find that many actions are shared across multiple hazards and can be considered synergistic (e.
g.
maintaining a three-day supply of food and water).
Many actions are also not mutually exclusive, such as vegetation management and maintaining access to emergency cash, subject to time and resource constraints.
However, a subset of actions are asynergistic, whereby preparation for one hazard may increase vulnerability to others, particularly when hazards occur simultaneously or in sequence.
For example, sealing windows and doors to protect against gas-based hazards (e.
g.
volcanic eruptions, wildfires) may impede evacuation during an earthquake.
We also identify more subtle tensions in seemingly synergistic actions, such as storing subsistence items upstairs to reduce flood damage, which may increase losses during wind-related hazards.
We argue that this database can support the development of more nuanced, locally tailored preparedness advice when used alongside multi-hazard risk registers.
More broadly, this work provides an evidence base that challenges assumptions of hazard-agnostic preparedness and highlights the need to explicitly consider synergies and asynergies in household risk reduction.

Related Results

Deterministic Graph Exploration with Advice
Deterministic Graph Exploration with Advice
We consider the fundamental task of graph exploration. An n -node graph has unlabeled nodes, and all ports at any node of degree d a...
Cash‐based approaches in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review
Cash‐based approaches in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review
This Campbell systematic review examines the effectiveness, efficiency and implementation of cash transfers in humanitarian settings. The review summarises evidence from five studi...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activi...
Multi-Hazard Entanglement
Multi-Hazard Entanglement
Globally, natural hazards such as tropical cyclones cause billions of dollars in damages. These hazards rarely occur in isolation. Frequently, one hazard triggers another, such as ...
Algorithm-based advice taking and clinical judgement: impact of advice distance and algorithm information
Algorithm-based advice taking and clinical judgement: impact of advice distance and algorithm information
Evidence-based algorithms can improve both lay and professional judgements and decisions, yet they remain underutilised. Research on advice taking established that humans tend to d...
Access Denied
Access Denied
Introduction As social-distancing mandates in response to COVID-19 restricted in-person data collection methods such as participant observation and interviews, researchers turned t...
Taking AI Advice in Crisis: How AI Anthropomorphism and Regulatory Focus of Advice Shape Advice-Taking
Taking AI Advice in Crisis: How AI Anthropomorphism and Regulatory Focus of Advice Shape Advice-Taking
Abstract Prior evidence is inconsistent about when people follow artificial intelligence (AI) rather than human advice, and crisis contexts are rarely tested. Crise...

Back to Top