Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Quantitative evaluation of the plutonium proliferation resistance

View through CrossRef
The mathematical model presented in (Kulikov et al. 2018) can be used for the quantitative evaluation of the plutonium proliferation resistance. This requires the warm-up process of an implosion nuclear explosive device (NED) with a different structure to be analyzed with respect to various heat removal conditions and the option to be identified in which the NED remains operational for the longest time possible. The fraction of the 238Pu isotope with which, even in this case, the NED will prove to be operational only for quite a short time can be regarded as sufficient for the plutonium with such composition to be considered a proliferation resistant material. The purpose of the paper is to evaluate in quantitative terms the content of 238Pu in plutonium for ensuring its proliferation resistance and to identify the factors which influence significantly this evaluation. The data, procedures and findings from earlier works on the topic, as well as the authors’ own estimates and calculations were used for the study. It has been shown that the important factors involved in the plutonium proliferation resistance evaluation are the NED technology level and the required NED lifetime. Depending on the required lifetime, tougher requirements can be introduced with respect to the 238Pu content both from the standpoint of low-technology and high-technology NEDs. With a lifetime of five hours taken as the guide-mark (a NED is unlikely to be finally assembled, transported and used for such a short time), it is only plutonium containing 55% of 238Pu that can be considered a proliferation resistant fissile material.
Title: Quantitative evaluation of the plutonium proliferation resistance
Description:
The mathematical model presented in (Kulikov et al.
2018) can be used for the quantitative evaluation of the plutonium proliferation resistance.
This requires the warm-up process of an implosion nuclear explosive device (NED) with a different structure to be analyzed with respect to various heat removal conditions and the option to be identified in which the NED remains operational for the longest time possible.
The fraction of the 238Pu isotope with which, even in this case, the NED will prove to be operational only for quite a short time can be regarded as sufficient for the plutonium with such composition to be considered a proliferation resistant material.
The purpose of the paper is to evaluate in quantitative terms the content of 238Pu in plutonium for ensuring its proliferation resistance and to identify the factors which influence significantly this evaluation.
The data, procedures and findings from earlier works on the topic, as well as the authors’ own estimates and calculations were used for the study.
It has been shown that the important factors involved in the plutonium proliferation resistance evaluation are the NED technology level and the required NED lifetime.
Depending on the required lifetime, tougher requirements can be introduced with respect to the 238Pu content both from the standpoint of low-technology and high-technology NEDs.
With a lifetime of five hours taken as the guide-mark (a NED is unlikely to be finally assembled, transported and used for such a short time), it is only plutonium containing 55% of 238Pu that can be considered a proliferation resistant fissile material.

Related Results

Computational model and physical and technical factors determining the plutonium proliferation resistance
Computational model and physical and technical factors determining the plutonium proliferation resistance
Since the closed nuclear fuel cycle suggests that plutonium is extracted from irradiated fuel and is recycled in nuclear reactors as part of the loaded fuel, proliferation resistan...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract Introduction Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Cerium oxalate precipitation: effect of process and operating parameters on cerium oxalate particle size distribution
Cerium oxalate precipitation: effect of process and operating parameters on cerium oxalate particle size distribution
Abstract The oxalate precipitation process has been adopted for the reconversion of plutonium nitrate present in nitric acid solution to plutonium oxide powder at th...
An advanced purex process based on salt-free reductants
An advanced purex process based on salt-free reductants
Abstract An advanced plutonium and uranium recovery process has been established based on two organic reductants, N,N-dimethylhydroxylamine (DMHAN) and methylhydrazi...
Costimulatory signals are required for optimal proliferation of human natural killer cells
Costimulatory signals are required for optimal proliferation of human natural killer cells
Abstract CD56dim NK cells, which comprise approximately 90% of human peripheral blood NK cells, respond to IL-2 with cytokine production, up-regulation of functional...
The Hazard Analysis of Plutonium Aerosol Resuspension in Typical Dated Nuclear-Polluted Regions
The Hazard Analysis of Plutonium Aerosol Resuspension in Typical Dated Nuclear-Polluted Regions
The plutonium material within the nuclear devices would be aerosolized, released from the source-term and deposited in the soil after nuclear tests or accidents. Due to the natural...
Long term proliferation and physiological response of embryogenic callus in Slash pine (Pinus Elliottii Engelm)
Long term proliferation and physiological response of embryogenic callus in Slash pine (Pinus Elliottii Engelm)
Abstract Slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm.) is an economically significant tree species valued for its timber and resin production. Establishing a somatic embryogenesis...

Back to Top