Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Relationship between Cervical Spine and Skeletal Class II in Subjects with and without Temporomandibular Disorders

View through CrossRef
Aim. To assess changes in the craniocervical structure and in hyoid bone position in skeletal Class II subjects with and without temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Materials and Methods. The cephalometric analysis of 59 subjects with skeletal Class II was evaluated and compared. The measurements considered were ANB as a parameter of Class II and C0-C1 distance, C1-C2 distance, craniocervical angle, and hyoid bone position for the cervical spine analysis. Patients were divided into patients with TMD (group A) and patients without TMD (group B). TMD were evaluated with Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD). Descriptive statistics and Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation analysis, with p value <0,005, were performed. Results. C0-C1 and C1-C2 distance values and hyoid bone position resulted within the normal range in the majority of patients examined. Craniocervical angle was altered in 33 patients. The reduction of this angle with the increase of the ANB value resulted to be statistically significant in group A, according to Pearson’s correlation index. No other data were statistically significant. Conclusions. The significant relationship between skeletal Class II and cervical spine cannot be highlighted. The alteration of craniocervical angle seems to be mildly present, with backward counterclockwise rotation of the head upon the neck in the sample (groups A and B). The presence of TMD as a key factor of changes in neck posture could explain the different result between the two groups about the relationship between ANB and craniocervical angle. This result should be further analyzed in order to better understand if cervical spine changes could be related to mandibular postural ones in the craniocervical space or to temporomandibular joint retropositioning, more recognizable in Class II with TMD, which could determine functional changes in other structures of this unit; neck posture could be the result of a compensatory/antalgic mechanism in response to TMD.
Title: Relationship between Cervical Spine and Skeletal Class II in Subjects with and without Temporomandibular Disorders
Description:
Aim.
To assess changes in the craniocervical structure and in hyoid bone position in skeletal Class II subjects with and without temporomandibular disorders (TMD).
Materials and Methods.
The cephalometric analysis of 59 subjects with skeletal Class II was evaluated and compared.
The measurements considered were ANB as a parameter of Class II and C0-C1 distance, C1-C2 distance, craniocervical angle, and hyoid bone position for the cervical spine analysis.
Patients were divided into patients with TMD (group A) and patients without TMD (group B).
TMD were evaluated with Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD).
Descriptive statistics and Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation analysis, with p value <0,005, were performed.
Results.
C0-C1 and C1-C2 distance values and hyoid bone position resulted within the normal range in the majority of patients examined.
Craniocervical angle was altered in 33 patients.
The reduction of this angle with the increase of the ANB value resulted to be statistically significant in group A, according to Pearson’s correlation index.
No other data were statistically significant.
Conclusions.
The significant relationship between skeletal Class II and cervical spine cannot be highlighted.
The alteration of craniocervical angle seems to be mildly present, with backward counterclockwise rotation of the head upon the neck in the sample (groups A and B).
The presence of TMD as a key factor of changes in neck posture could explain the different result between the two groups about the relationship between ANB and craniocervical angle.
This result should be further analyzed in order to better understand if cervical spine changes could be related to mandibular postural ones in the craniocervical space or to temporomandibular joint retropositioning, more recognizable in Class II with TMD, which could determine functional changes in other structures of this unit; neck posture could be the result of a compensatory/antalgic mechanism in response to TMD.

Related Results

Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Objective: To determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population idiopathic determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population...
Comparison between upper thoracic spine mobilization and the Ergon technique in the treatment of mechanical neck pain
Comparison between upper thoracic spine mobilization and the Ergon technique in the treatment of mechanical neck pain
Upper thoracic spine mobilization and the Ergon technique are used to treat mechanical neck pain in order to speed recovery, promote tissue healing and improve range of motion. The...
SPECIFICATION FOR TESTING AUTOMOTIVE MINIATURE BULBS
SPECIFICATION FOR TESTING AUTOMOTIVE MINIATURE BULBS
<div class="section abstract"> <div class="htmlview paragraph">The procedures contained in this specification cover the laboratory testing of miniature incandescent b...
Relationship between Tongue Volume and Condylar Position in Skeletal Class I and Class II Subjects: An MRI Study
Relationship between Tongue Volume and Condylar Position in Skeletal Class I and Class II Subjects: An MRI Study
Introduction Tongue morphology and mandibular condylar position are important components of the craniofacial complex and have been independently associated with sagittal skeletal ...

Back to Top