Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Prophylaxis with FEIBA in paediatric patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors

View through CrossRef
SummaryThe benefits shown with factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis relating to joint health and quality of life (QoL) provide the rationale for FEIBA prophylaxis in haemophilia A patients with persistent FVIII inhibitors. FEIBA has previously shown efficacy in preventing bleeds in inhibitor patients who failed to respond to, or were ineligible for immune tolerance induction (ITI). The study examined the outcome of paediatric patients undergoing long‐term FEIBA prophylaxis. A retrospective chart review included severe haemophilia A patients with persistent inhibitors aged ≤13 years at the start of FEIBA prophylaxis. Baseline characteristics captured dose, frequency of prophylaxis, history of inhibitor development, including baseline titre, historical peak titre and history of ITI. Outcome measurements included annual bleed rate before and during FEIBA prophylaxis, joint status and school days missed. Sixteen cases of FEIBA prophylaxis from two centres are presented. The mean age of subjects at prophylaxis initiation was 7.5 ± 3.6 years and median baseline inhibitor titre was 23 (range 3.1–170) BU. Prior to prophylaxis initiation, median annual joint bleeds among all patients was 4 (0–48), which dropped significantly after the first year of prophylaxis, to a median annual joint bleed rate of 1 (0–7; P = 0.0179). Subsequent years (median = 9) of prophylaxis therapy demonstrated similarly low annual joint bleed rates. There were no life‐threatening bleeds, no viral seroconversions or thrombotic events during FEIBA prophylaxis treatment. FEIBA prophylaxis was effective for preventing joint bleeds and subsequent joint damage, delaying arthropathy and improving outcomes in children with haemophilia A and inhibitors to FVIII, who failed or were ineligible for ITI.
Title: Prophylaxis with FEIBA in paediatric patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors
Description:
SummaryThe benefits shown with factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis relating to joint health and quality of life (QoL) provide the rationale for FEIBA prophylaxis in haemophilia A patients with persistent FVIII inhibitors.
FEIBA has previously shown efficacy in preventing bleeds in inhibitor patients who failed to respond to, or were ineligible for immune tolerance induction (ITI).
The study examined the outcome of paediatric patients undergoing long‐term FEIBA prophylaxis.
A retrospective chart review included severe haemophilia A patients with persistent inhibitors aged ≤13 years at the start of FEIBA prophylaxis.
Baseline characteristics captured dose, frequency of prophylaxis, history of inhibitor development, including baseline titre, historical peak titre and history of ITI.
Outcome measurements included annual bleed rate before and during FEIBA prophylaxis, joint status and school days missed.
Sixteen cases of FEIBA prophylaxis from two centres are presented.
The mean age of subjects at prophylaxis initiation was 7.
5 ± 3.
6 years and median baseline inhibitor titre was 23 (range 3.
1–170) BU.
Prior to prophylaxis initiation, median annual joint bleeds among all patients was 4 (0–48), which dropped significantly after the first year of prophylaxis, to a median annual joint bleed rate of 1 (0–7; P = 0.
0179).
Subsequent years (median = 9) of prophylaxis therapy demonstrated similarly low annual joint bleed rates.
There were no life‐threatening bleeds, no viral seroconversions or thrombotic events during FEIBA prophylaxis treatment.
FEIBA prophylaxis was effective for preventing joint bleeds and subsequent joint damage, delaying arthropathy and improving outcomes in children with haemophilia A and inhibitors to FVIII, who failed or were ineligible for ITI.

Related Results

Treatment trends for haemophilia A and haemophilia B in the United States: results from the 2010 practice patterns survey
Treatment trends for haemophilia A and haemophilia B in the United States: results from the 2010 practice patterns survey
Summary.  Frequent evaluation of haemophilia treatment is necessary to improve patient care. The 2010 Practice Patterns Survey (PPS) investigated current trends in haemophilia trea...
Proceedings of the Qatar Paediatric Emergency Medicine 2026 Conference - Selected Abstracts
Proceedings of the Qatar Paediatric Emergency Medicine 2026 Conference - Selected Abstracts
Welcome to this issue of Panorama of Emergency Medicine (POEM) dedicated to the 10th Qatar Paediatric Emergency Medicine (Q-PEM) International Conference which was organised and ho...
When should prophylactic treatment in patients with haemophilia A and B start?— The German experience
When should prophylactic treatment in patients with haemophilia A and B start?— The German experience
Summary. Radiological and orthopaedic outcome in severe and moderate haemophilia A and B patients undergoing long‐term prophylactic treatment were prospectively investigated focusi...
A preliminary application of a haemophilia value framework to emerging therapies in haemophilia
A preliminary application of a haemophilia value framework to emerging therapies in haemophilia
AbstractIntroductionEmergence of new therapies are anticipated to improve clinical outcomes and quality of life of persons with haemophilia. Challenges in conducting randomized cli...
A transgender person with haemophilia
A transgender person with haemophilia
Abstract Introduction Transgender people face many obstacles to accessing healthcare but cultural changes are likely to i...
Prophylaxis in the haemophilia population
Prophylaxis in the haemophilia population
Summary.  Prophylaxis is recommended as preventive therapy for young boys with severe haemophilia in countries where safe factor concentrates are available. This recommendation is ...
Haemophilia care in Iraq; a multi-centre study
Haemophilia care in Iraq; a multi-centre study
Objectives: To evaluate the level of care available to haemophilia patients. Method: The descriptive, retrospective analytical study was conducted from December 15, 2020, to March...

Back to Top