Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Values-Based Involuntary Seclusion and Treatment
View through CrossRef
This chapter gives a reflective account of a values-based model of involuntary psychiatric seclusion and treatment (henceforth “involuntary treatment”) adopted in the training materials produced by the UK government to support implementation of its Mental Health Act 2007 and associated Code of Practice. Values-based involuntary treatment supports balanced decision-making on individual cases within a framework of shared Guiding Principles. A critical factor in developing the model was partnership between stakeholders representing the plurality of value perspectives embodied in the Guiding Principles. Values pluralism however has not been widely reflected in practice. Possible reasons for this include a fault-line in values-based practice. This has been focused on individual decision-making whereas the decisive influences on involuntary treatment have turned out to be social and political. Broadening the philosophical resources of values-based practice to include those of political philosophy may contribute to the development of more effective approaches to values-based involuntary treatment.
Title: Values-Based Involuntary Seclusion and Treatment
Description:
This chapter gives a reflective account of a values-based model of involuntary psychiatric seclusion and treatment (henceforth “involuntary treatment”) adopted in the training materials produced by the UK government to support implementation of its Mental Health Act 2007 and associated Code of Practice.
Values-based involuntary treatment supports balanced decision-making on individual cases within a framework of shared Guiding Principles.
A critical factor in developing the model was partnership between stakeholders representing the plurality of value perspectives embodied in the Guiding Principles.
Values pluralism however has not been widely reflected in practice.
Possible reasons for this include a fault-line in values-based practice.
This has been focused on individual decision-making whereas the decisive influences on involuntary treatment have turned out to be social and political.
Broadening the philosophical resources of values-based practice to include those of political philosophy may contribute to the development of more effective approaches to values-based involuntary treatment.
Related Results
Tort Liability
Tort Liability
Torts are involuntary seizures of entitlements of a certain kind in a particular exchange environment, and tort liability attempts to ensure that tortfeasors compensate their victi...
Challenges to the orthodoxy
Challenges to the orthodoxy
Two comparatively recent developments in health care ethics and policy further challenge the conventional bases for involuntary treatment in mental health care. First has been the ...
Depressions Plural
Depressions Plural
This chapter examines how values influence the heterogeneity of depression. The plurality of values is increasingly significant for contemporary person-centred mental health care w...
Values-Based Practice
Values-Based Practice
This chapter outlines the origins in ordinary language philosophy of a new skills-based approach to working with complex and conflicting values in medicine called values-based prac...
8. Mental health
8. Mental health
Each Concentrate revision guide is packed with essential information, key cases, revision tips, exam Q&As, and more. Concentrates show you what to expect in a law exam, what ex...
The ethics of coercion in community mental health care
The ethics of coercion in community mental health care
The specific context of community mental health care affects the debate surrounding coercion in psychiatry, not by raising radically new questions but by highlighting the complexit...

