Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Improving the usability and utilization of cancer registry data : the need to identify a core data set
View through CrossRef
Cancer registries in the US and Canada have a long history of data standards and data collection that have developed from a minimal dataset to the standard dataset that is used now. Central Cancer Registries (CCRs) are good resources for cancer data, but are often underutilized. CCRs are recognized for high quality data standards by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) or the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program and receive certification from the North American Association of Central Registries (NAACCR). Each year, there are many changes to the data that are collected in the cancer registry field. Standards, requirements, and medical knowledge change frequently. The changes in the data collection process cause interference and decrease in quality of data fields, but also delays in the timely collection of cancer registry data. The objective of this study is to identify what essentially needs to be collected and what can be collected optionally in a cancer registry. The goal is a robust dataset that can be used for other disease registries, cancer data surveillance, public health, and research. CCRs and Cancer Centers (CR) were surveyed to identify and describe the data items that are collected and needed to achieve a dataset that can serve cancer surveillance and research. The surveys were analyzed to identify overlaps of common and special interests, as well as barriers. The results showed that cancer registries have data available, but need to look at the timely release of a core dataset for use in cancer surveillance and research. The surveys also evaluated the barriers to data use from cancer registries and barriers for data use of collected datasets to identify the initial data request process. Data in the cancer registry are in a format that can easily be adopted by public health, surveillance, and research. The requesting process needs to be accessible, understandable, and streamlined to enable successful use of the data.
Title: Improving the usability and utilization of cancer registry data : the need to identify a core data set
Description:
Cancer registries in the US and Canada have a long history of data standards and data collection that have developed from a minimal dataset to the standard dataset that is used now.
Central Cancer Registries (CCRs) are good resources for cancer data, but are often underutilized.
CCRs are recognized for high quality data standards by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) or the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program and receive certification from the North American Association of Central Registries (NAACCR).
Each year, there are many changes to the data that are collected in the cancer registry field.
Standards, requirements, and medical knowledge change frequently.
The changes in the data collection process cause interference and decrease in quality of data fields, but also delays in the timely collection of cancer registry data.
The objective of this study is to identify what essentially needs to be collected and what can be collected optionally in a cancer registry.
The goal is a robust dataset that can be used for other disease registries, cancer data surveillance, public health, and research.
CCRs and Cancer Centers (CR) were surveyed to identify and describe the data items that are collected and needed to achieve a dataset that can serve cancer surveillance and research.
The surveys were analyzed to identify overlaps of common and special interests, as well as barriers.
The results showed that cancer registries have data available, but need to look at the timely release of a core dataset for use in cancer surveillance and research.
The surveys also evaluated the barriers to data use from cancer registries and barriers for data use of collected datasets to identify the initial data request process.
Data in the cancer registry are in a format that can easily be adopted by public health, surveillance, and research.
The requesting process needs to be accessible, understandable, and streamlined to enable successful use of the data.
Related Results
Applying a user-centered approach to evaluate the usability of a mobile application for health professionals in home care services (Preprint)
Applying a user-centered approach to evaluate the usability of a mobile application for health professionals in home care services (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
Mobile health (mHealth), or the use of mobile devices in medicine and health, is a sub-category of e-health. mHealth interventions are designed t...
Usability Quality Model: An Enhancement of Dromey's Model
Usability Quality Model: An Enhancement of Dromey's Model
ABSTRACT
Usability is a fundamental software quality attribute that strongly influences user performance, acceptance, and the overall success of software systems....
Evaluasi Usability Website UNRIYO Menggunakan System Usability Scale (Studi Kasus: Website UNRIYO)
Evaluasi Usability Website UNRIYO Menggunakan System Usability Scale (Studi Kasus: Website UNRIYO)
INTISARIWebsite UNRIYO yang saat ini digunakan sebagai media informasi dan komunikasi baik secara internal ataupun eksternal belum pernah dilakukan evaluasi, baik pada saat peranc...
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract
A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...
Implementation of Population-Based Cancer Registry in Georgia: Results of the Appeared Requirements to NCCP
Implementation of Population-Based Cancer Registry in Georgia: Results of the Appeared Requirements to NCCP
Background: The current cancer patterns in Georgia indicate that a significant proportion of cancer cases and deaths are preventable if appropriate actions are undertaken. The esti...
Usability guidelines for manuscript management systems
Usability guidelines for manuscript management systems
Context
Manuscript management systems (MMS) serve as centralized platforms for managing the submission, review, and publication of scholarly articles, thereby s...
Abstract OT-11-01: The informed genetics annotated patient registry: The iGAP registry
Abstract OT-11-01: The informed genetics annotated patient registry: The iGAP registry
Abstract
Background
Interest and knowledge about the genetics and biology of inherited risk of and progression of disease is growing. Physicians are i...

