Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Long term survival in gastro-oesophageal cancer: Table 1
View through CrossRef
Introduction
One of the changes implemented following the publication of the Improving Outcome Guidances (IOG) is the centralisation of cancer services to ensure delivery of an effective management plan to all patients diagnosed with gastro-oesophageal cancer. With the high mortality, monitoring and auditing treatment outcomes is vital in ensuring that these patients receive the best available treatment. The recent publication of the National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit data further re-iterates this and forms the crux of evidence-based management of patients diagnosed with gastro-oesophageal cancer.
Methods
The study aims to measure the survival outcome of patients diagnosed with both gastric and oesophageal cancer in our NHS trust who has a catchment population of 500 000 across the 2 district general hospitals. We retrospectively reviewed the medical notes, computerised notes of the multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings as well as endoscopy reports of all patients diagnosed with gastro-oesophageal cancer in the 5-year period from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2008. The date of death was noted and the number of survivors as of 15 July 2010 were taken into account.
Results
234 and 139 patients were diagnosed with oesophageal and gastric cancer respectively, of which data from 6 patients were unavailable. As of 15 July 2010, 46 (12%) of all patients traced are still alive, 31 (13%) with oesophageal cancer and 15 (11%) with gastric cancer. For those that have died, the median survival was 156 days (2–1594) and 251 days (4–1413) for patients with gastric and oesophageal cancer respectively. For patients with oesophageal cancer, the median survival in those managed palliatively was 247 days (4–1022) while the median survival was 383 days (71–1413) in those that had neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. Survival rates are shown below.
Conclusion
The improved survival after treatment with curative intent (surgery ± neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary chemoradiotherapy) is encouraging. For oesophageal cancer, our 1-year survival rate (75%) in this group mirrors the results from the recently published National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit 2010 (76.1%). There are more patients with gastric cancer being managed palliatively and this is reflected by the lower survival rates in this group. Centralisation of services in this trust occurred in 2009 and comparison with these data in future are vital in monitoring its success.
Table 1
PWE-114 Survival in gastro-oesophageal cancer
% Overall survival
% Survival with curative intent
% Survival with palliative intent
Gastric cancer
(n=123)
(n=33)
(n=90)
6 months
50
64
43
12 months
30
53
18
42 months
12
29
0
Oesophageal cancer
(n=197)
(n=44)
(n=153)
6 months
65
87
55
12 months
42
75
27
42 months
15
41
0
Title: Long term survival in gastro-oesophageal cancer: Table 1
Description:
Introduction
One of the changes implemented following the publication of the Improving Outcome Guidances (IOG) is the centralisation of cancer services to ensure delivery of an effective management plan to all patients diagnosed with gastro-oesophageal cancer.
With the high mortality, monitoring and auditing treatment outcomes is vital in ensuring that these patients receive the best available treatment.
The recent publication of the National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit data further re-iterates this and forms the crux of evidence-based management of patients diagnosed with gastro-oesophageal cancer.
Methods
The study aims to measure the survival outcome of patients diagnosed with both gastric and oesophageal cancer in our NHS trust who has a catchment population of 500 000 across the 2 district general hospitals.
We retrospectively reviewed the medical notes, computerised notes of the multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings as well as endoscopy reports of all patients diagnosed with gastro-oesophageal cancer in the 5-year period from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2008.
The date of death was noted and the number of survivors as of 15 July 2010 were taken into account.
Results
234 and 139 patients were diagnosed with oesophageal and gastric cancer respectively, of which data from 6 patients were unavailable.
As of 15 July 2010, 46 (12%) of all patients traced are still alive, 31 (13%) with oesophageal cancer and 15 (11%) with gastric cancer.
For those that have died, the median survival was 156 days (2–1594) and 251 days (4–1413) for patients with gastric and oesophageal cancer respectively.
For patients with oesophageal cancer, the median survival in those managed palliatively was 247 days (4–1022) while the median survival was 383 days (71–1413) in those that had neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery.
Survival rates are shown below.
Conclusion
The improved survival after treatment with curative intent (surgery ± neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary chemoradiotherapy) is encouraging.
For oesophageal cancer, our 1-year survival rate (75%) in this group mirrors the results from the recently published National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit 2010 (76.
1%).
There are more patients with gastric cancer being managed palliatively and this is reflected by the lower survival rates in this group.
Centralisation of services in this trust occurred in 2009 and comparison with these data in future are vital in monitoring its success.
Table 1
PWE-114 Survival in gastro-oesophageal cancer
% Overall survival
% Survival with curative intent
% Survival with palliative intent
Gastric cancer
(n=123)
(n=33)
(n=90)
6 months
50
64
43
12 months
30
53
18
42 months
12
29
0
Oesophageal cancer
(n=197)
(n=44)
(n=153)
6 months
65
87
55
12 months
42
75
27
42 months
15
41
0.
Related Results
KONTESTASI TASAWUF SUNNÎ DAN TASAWUF FALSAFÎ DI NUSANTARA
KONTESTASI TASAWUF SUNNÎ DAN TASAWUF FALSAFÎ DI NUSANTARA
<p>This article scrutinizes the history of Islamic development in Nusantara between 15th to 18th centuries, which has been colored from theological mysticism thought. Uniquel...
Impact of gastro-oesophageal reflux on microRNA expression, location and function
Impact of gastro-oesophageal reflux on microRNA expression, location and function
Abstract
Background
Ulceration of the oesophageal squamous mucosa (ulcerative oesophagitis) is a pathological manifestation of gastro-oesophageal...
Oesophageal atresia: Are “long gap” patients at greater anesthetic risk?
Oesophageal atresia: Are “long gap” patients at greater anesthetic risk?
SummaryBackgroundLong gap oesophageal atresia occurs in approximately 10% of all oesophageal atresia infants and surgical repair is often difficult with significant postoperative c...
Treating gastro-oesophageal cancer- a national comparison: Table 1
Treating gastro-oesophageal cancer- a national comparison: Table 1
Introduction
The incidence of gastric cancer is on decline but cases of oesophageal adenocarcinoma and junctional tumour are rising in UK. Patients present at a...
Increased risk of gastro-oesophageal cancers among married couples: Data from the Ardabil Cancer Registry (ACR) in Northwest of Iran, 2002-2016
Increased risk of gastro-oesophageal cancers among married couples: Data from the Ardabil Cancer Registry (ACR) in Northwest of Iran, 2002-2016
Abstract
Background: The study of cancer in spouses may play an important role in the assessment of cancer etiology. This study aims to evaluate the risk of gastro-oesophag...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Endoscopic management of gastro-oesophageal cancer-improved survival?: Table 1
Endoscopic management of gastro-oesophageal cancer-improved survival?: Table 1
Introduction
Endoscopy plays an important role in the palliative management of patients diagnosed with gastro-oesophageal cancer as well as temporary alleviatio...
International variation in oesophageal and gastric cancer survival 2012–2014: differences by histological subtype and stage at diagnosis (an ICBP SURVMARK-2 population-based study)
International variation in oesophageal and gastric cancer survival 2012–2014: differences by histological subtype and stage at diagnosis (an ICBP SURVMARK-2 population-based study)
Objective
To provide the first international comparison of oesophageal and gastric cancer survival by stage at diagnosis and histological subtype across high-in...

