Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Constructivist Approach Analysis on the Boycott of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympic
View through CrossRef
The 2022 Winter Olympics in Beijing have drawn a lot of attention since a number of important nations have put a diplomatic boycott on the event. The United States, Britain, and Canada were among the nations that enacted a diplomatic embargo. Using a constructivism theory approach, this research will attempt to give an analytical study of the occurrence of this boycott. Instead of adopting traditional approaches like liberalism and realism, the author believes that this approach offers a fresh viewpoint on this phenomenon. From a constructivist perspective, the nation that imposed a diplomatic boycott on the Beijing 2022 Olympics was regarded as having constructive elements that encourage such behavior. Every nation has its own factors that will shift the way that nations make decisions. The main argument of this paper is that there are three main factors that construct the boycott behavior of these countries. The first is the construction of friend vs foe between the boycotting countries and China as the host country. Boycott countries that share ideological similarities construct a point of view that China is an enemy to them because of their differences. The second argument is the existence of China's construction as a country that perpetrates human rights violations. This prompted the boycotting countries to protest with the boycott. The third argument is the existence of bilateral problems between countries. Some countries, such as Canada, have bilateral problems with China, which then encourage the construction of boycott behavior that occurs.
University of Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur
Title: Constructivist Approach Analysis on the Boycott of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympic
Description:
The 2022 Winter Olympics in Beijing have drawn a lot of attention since a number of important nations have put a diplomatic boycott on the event.
The United States, Britain, and Canada were among the nations that enacted a diplomatic embargo.
Using a constructivism theory approach, this research will attempt to give an analytical study of the occurrence of this boycott.
Instead of adopting traditional approaches like liberalism and realism, the author believes that this approach offers a fresh viewpoint on this phenomenon.
From a constructivist perspective, the nation that imposed a diplomatic boycott on the Beijing 2022 Olympics was regarded as having constructive elements that encourage such behavior.
Every nation has its own factors that will shift the way that nations make decisions.
The main argument of this paper is that there are three main factors that construct the boycott behavior of these countries.
The first is the construction of friend vs foe between the boycotting countries and China as the host country.
Boycott countries that share ideological similarities construct a point of view that China is an enemy to them because of their differences.
The second argument is the existence of China's construction as a country that perpetrates human rights violations.
This prompted the boycotting countries to protest with the boycott.
The third argument is the existence of bilateral problems between countries.
Some countries, such as Canada, have bilateral problems with China, which then encourage the construction of boycott behavior that occurs.
Related Results
Boycott Campaign Intensity on Consumer Boycott Intentions and Participation: The Role of Access to Substitute Products
Boycott Campaign Intensity on Consumer Boycott Intentions and Participation: The Role of Access to Substitute Products
This study examines the relationship between the intensity of boycott campaigns and the intention to participate in such campaigns, with a focus on the mediating role of boycott in...
Study on the role of Romanian olympic champions's models in achieving olympic education
Study on the role of Romanian olympic champions's models in achieving olympic education
"Olympic education" is a term with a history of about 50 years, which was proposed by N. Moller. It first appeared in sports education and Olympic research in the 1970s. Does "Olym...
The New Agenda 2020+5 and the Future Challenges for the Olympic Movement
The New Agenda 2020+5 and the Future Challenges for the Olympic Movement
In March 2021, the Session of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) has approved a new strategic roadmap, Olympic Agenda 2020+5, consisting of 15 recommendations. The title, Ol...
Olympic Diplomacy and Peacebuilding in the Los Angeles 2028 Olympic Games: Evaluating the Potential of Sport to Promote International Dialogue, Conflict Prevention, and Global Cooperation
Olympic Diplomacy and Peacebuilding in the Los Angeles 2028 Olympic Games: Evaluating the Potential of Sport to Promote International Dialogue, Conflict Prevention, and Global Cooperation
The Olympic Games constitute one of the world’s most prominent platforms for international interaction, bringing together states, athletes, institutions, and diverse communities wi...
Psychological Insights on the Fans’ Boycott of the 2022 FIFA World Cup
Psychological Insights on the Fans’ Boycott of the 2022 FIFA World Cup
The 2022 FIFA World Cup in Qatar has been criticised for numerous social, political, and environmental issues. While an important call to boycott the tournament spread worldwide, r...
Psychological Insights on the Fans’ Boycott of the 2022 FIFA World Cup
Psychological Insights on the Fans’ Boycott of the 2022 FIFA World Cup
The 2022 FIFA World Cup in Qatar has been criticised for numerous social, political, and environmental issues. While an important call to boycott the tournament spread worldwide, r...
Proposition of the relational boycott
Proposition of the relational boycott
Purpose
– The purpose of this study is to identify, in the context of virtual social networks (VSNs), other types of boycott which have not yet been addressed in th...
Understanding the olympic phenomenon through the olympic circles at school level
Understanding the olympic phenomenon through the olympic circles at school level
Why did we reinstate the Olympic Games? Coubertin asked himself, "To ennoble and strengthen sports, to ensure their independence and vitality and thus make them capable of better f...

