Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Ethical Veganism, Virtue Ethics, and the Great Soul

View through CrossRef
Millions of animals are brought into existence and raised for food every year. This has generated three serious problems: first, intensive animal farming is one of the leading causes of environmental degradation. Farming livestock contributes to a large amount of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere each year; it contributes to land and water degradation, biodiversity loss, coral reef degeneration, and deforestation. Second, raising animals for food causes millions of animals to suffer and be killed. And third, consumption of meat and animal products is linked with heart disease, diabetes, and various cancers. Consequently, a global change in the way that animals are treated is imperative. Many moral philosophers have suggested a move toward vegetarianism. But vegetarianism, unfortunately, still relies on raising animals for food, and does not avoid the deleterious effects of animal products on human health. The right solution is ethical veganism, which is the avoidance of all animal products and by-products. Some moral philosophers have framed ethical veganism in terms of animals having the same fundamental rights as humans, a notion that is highly controversial. In any case, the view that animals have rights is not capable of generating the moral duty to embrace ethical veganism. The answer is to adopt a virtue-oriented approach to the treatment of animals because the acquisition of virtues, such as compassion, magnanimity, temperance, and fairness enable people to see that raising and using animals for food is unfair, callous, and self-indulgent.
Lexington Books
Title: Ethical Veganism, Virtue Ethics, and the Great Soul
Description:
Millions of animals are brought into existence and raised for food every year.
This has generated three serious problems: first, intensive animal farming is one of the leading causes of environmental degradation.
Farming livestock contributes to a large amount of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere each year; it contributes to land and water degradation, biodiversity loss, coral reef degeneration, and deforestation.
Second, raising animals for food causes millions of animals to suffer and be killed.
And third, consumption of meat and animal products is linked with heart disease, diabetes, and various cancers.
Consequently, a global change in the way that animals are treated is imperative.
Many moral philosophers have suggested a move toward vegetarianism.
But vegetarianism, unfortunately, still relies on raising animals for food, and does not avoid the deleterious effects of animal products on human health.
The right solution is ethical veganism, which is the avoidance of all animal products and by-products.
Some moral philosophers have framed ethical veganism in terms of animals having the same fundamental rights as humans, a notion that is highly controversial.
In any case, the view that animals have rights is not capable of generating the moral duty to embrace ethical veganism.
The answer is to adopt a virtue-oriented approach to the treatment of animals because the acquisition of virtues, such as compassion, magnanimity, temperance, and fairness enable people to see that raising and using animals for food is unfair, callous, and self-indulgent.

Related Results

A Critique of Principlism
A Critique of Principlism
Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash INTRODUCTION Bioethics does not have an explicitly stated and agreed upon means of resolving conflicts between normative theories. As such, b...
Veganism Sentiments and Preferences among Muslims
Veganism Sentiments and Preferences among Muslims
Veganism has become a significant lifestyle which is being religiously practiced by people from across the globe as their routine. To date, the Muslims also followed suit with the ...
Kitâbü’ş-Şifâ: Nefs
Kitâbü’ş-Şifâ: Nefs
The theory of the soul, as it is presented in the texts of classical philosophers, is a theory that tries to explain how vitality and movement are attached to existence and human b...
The Ethics of Raw Veganism
The Ethics of Raw Veganism
Abstract This article is a review of Carlo Alvaro's Raw Veganism: The Philosophy of the Human Diet. Alvaro offers interesting and novel arguments in support of raw v...
Materialism and Environmental Knowledge as a Mediator for Relationships between Religiosity and Ethical Consumption
Materialism and Environmental Knowledge as a Mediator for Relationships between Religiosity and Ethical Consumption
ABSTRACTOn a global and regional scale, Indonesia has one of the least environmentally sustainable economies in the Asia-Pacific region. Consumption is one of the key factors contr...
The soul words of the Ukrainian people
The soul words of the Ukrainian people
The article presents the main directions of the domestic psychological science development which are devoted to the psychology of the Ukrainian person and the Ukrainian people in t...
You Are How You Eat? Femininity, Normalization, and Veganism as an Ethical Practice of Freedom
You Are How You Eat? Femininity, Normalization, and Veganism as an Ethical Practice of Freedom
In this paper I argue that the practice of veganism is, or can be, a Foucauldian ethical practice of freedom. I begin by sketching out the problematization of alimentary practices ...
Target Centred Virtue Ethics
Target Centred Virtue Ethics
Abstract Virtue ethics in its contemporary manifestation is dominated by neo-Aristotelian virtue ethics primarily developed by Rosalind Hursthouse. This version of e...

Back to Top