Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparative Analysis of Apache 2 Performance in Docker Containers vs Native Environment
View through CrossRef
Web servers have become crucial to facilitate access to and distribute such content on the internet. In this case, Docker containerization technology offers a solution. Docker allows developers to package applications and dependencies in one container, making deploying web servers faster and easier. But with these features, is there any performance that must be sacrificed if we choose to use docker in our web server deployment process. We will look at how much performance will be sacrificed. However, we must thoroughly analyze how Apache2 performs when running in a Docker container compared to running natively. That's why we're conducting a study to compare the performance of Apache2 in a Docker container versus a native environment using experimental methods. For this study, we'll use the Apache bench tool to test Apache2's performance in both environments. By experimenting, it should become clear how the performance of Docker containers compares to native environments when developing web servers. The research shows that Apache2 performance on native hosts is about 5-10% better than in a docker environment in handling small request loads. The better performance here refers to the parameters we tested: total time results, requests per second, and transfer speed. The request load variation can differ depending on the server specification itself. Although Docker offers features in terms of application isolation and scalability, our results show that running Apache2 natively is more efficient without changing its default configuration. The additional overhead Docker can be required to run the docker system in isolating the application; in this case, the virtualization layer is required to run Apache2 inside a Docker container. This can affect application performance and cause a slight performance degradation compared to using the host operating system directly. This research aims to inform developers about the performance difference between apache2 in Docker and the native environment. It will help them make informed decisions about deployment environments. Docker offers appealing features, but its performance may need to improve. Test results show that the native host performs better, although its feature set is not as extensive as that of Docker.
Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Title: Comparative Analysis of Apache 2 Performance in Docker Containers vs Native Environment
Description:
Web servers have become crucial to facilitate access to and distribute such content on the internet.
In this case, Docker containerization technology offers a solution.
Docker allows developers to package applications and dependencies in one container, making deploying web servers faster and easier.
But with these features, is there any performance that must be sacrificed if we choose to use docker in our web server deployment process.
We will look at how much performance will be sacrificed.
However, we must thoroughly analyze how Apache2 performs when running in a Docker container compared to running natively.
That's why we're conducting a study to compare the performance of Apache2 in a Docker container versus a native environment using experimental methods.
For this study, we'll use the Apache bench tool to test Apache2's performance in both environments.
By experimenting, it should become clear how the performance of Docker containers compares to native environments when developing web servers.
The research shows that Apache2 performance on native hosts is about 5-10% better than in a docker environment in handling small request loads.
The better performance here refers to the parameters we tested: total time results, requests per second, and transfer speed.
The request load variation can differ depending on the server specification itself.
Although Docker offers features in terms of application isolation and scalability, our results show that running Apache2 natively is more efficient without changing its default configuration.
The additional overhead Docker can be required to run the docker system in isolating the application; in this case, the virtualization layer is required to run Apache2 inside a Docker container.
This can affect application performance and cause a slight performance degradation compared to using the host operating system directly.
This research aims to inform developers about the performance difference between apache2 in Docker and the native environment.
It will help them make informed decisions about deployment environments.
Docker offers appealing features, but its performance may need to improve.
Test results show that the native host performs better, although its feature set is not as extensive as that of Docker.
Related Results
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Impacts of man-made structures on marine biodiversity and species status - native & non-native species
Impacts of man-made structures on marine biodiversity and species status - native & non-native species
<p>Coastal environments are exposed to anthropogenic activities such as frequent marine traffic and restructuring, i.e., addition, removal or replacing with man-made structur...
BGDMdocker: a Docker workflow for analysis and visualization pan-genome and biosynthetic gene clusters of bacterial
BGDMdocker: a Docker workflow for analysis and visualization pan-genome and biosynthetic gene clusters of bacterial
ABSTRACT
Motivation
At present Docker technology has received increasing level of attention throughout the bioinformatics commu...
Validity of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV for the Prediction of Prolonged Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Length of Stay in Dr. Sardjito General Hospital in the COVID Era
Validity of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV for the Prediction of Prolonged Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Length of Stay in Dr. Sardjito General Hospital in the COVID Era
Introduction: APACHE IV was a good predictor of ICU length of stay in the USA and some countries outside the USA but poor in others. It is important to develop a scoring system for...
CREDO: a friendly Customizable, REproducible, DOcker file generator for bioinformatics applications
CREDO: a friendly Customizable, REproducible, DOcker file generator for bioinformatics applications
Abstract
Background
The analysis of large and complex biological datasets in bioinformatics poses a significant challenge to achieving reproducible ...
Predictive accuracy of Apache-II for mortality in Poly Trauma patients.
Predictive accuracy of Apache-II for mortality in Poly Trauma patients.
Objectives: The objective of our study was to find diagnostic accuracy of APACHE-II score to predict mortality in poly trauma patients within first 24 hours of hospitalization. Stu...
Predictive accuracy of APACHE II score in predicting mortality in poly Trauma patients.
Predictive accuracy of APACHE II score in predicting mortality in poly Trauma patients.
Objective: To find diagnostic precision of APACHE II score in predicting mortality in poly Trauma patients within first 24 hours of hospitalization. Study Design: Cross Sectional s...
Deepwater Pipelay: Extending The Limits
Deepwater Pipelay: Extending The Limits
ABSTRACT
The Stena Apache laid pipe in a record 900 metres water depth in 1994 following vessel modifications and remote systems development. The potential limits...

