Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Impact of reference electrode position on motor unit number estimation (MUNE) in the tibialis anterior muscle using MScanFit: test-retest reliability

View through CrossRef
Abstract Objectives This study aimed to assess the effect of varying the reference electrode position, specifically comparing position A3 (medial patella) to routine position 1 (R1) and the MScan multicenter protocol position (M1), on compound muscle action potential (CMAP) and motor unit number estimation (MUNE) in the tibialis anterior muscle of healthy participants. Methods Twenty healthy participants underwent repeated MScanFit MUNE assessments with a 7-14 day interval between tests. The reference electrode (E2) was placed in three positions at each visit (A3, R1, and M1), while the active electrode (E1) remained constant. An additional seventeen participants were included to establish the minimal detectable true change in MUNE values using MScanFit, with the reference electrode exclusively in the M1 position. Results The reference electrode position significantly influenced CMAP and MUNE, with R1 resulting in lower values. However, no significant difference was observed between M1 and A3 positions. Relative and absolute reliability indicators favored using the M1 position for reference in MScanFit MUNE. In a combined dataset of 37 healthy participants, the average tibialis anterior muscle motor unit count was estimated at 148 (SD 25.2), with a minimal detectable true change of 55 units. Conclusions The preference for the M1 position over the alternative A3 position is supported, particularly for MScanFit MUNE assessments in the tibialis anterior muscle. Clinically, a true change in MUNE should consider the minimal detectable change of 55 motor units, underscoring the reality that large changes in MUNE are required to conclude a genuine change beyond measurement error. Significance For MUNE examinations of the tibialis anterior muscle, adhering to the electrode positions outlined in the MScan multicenter protocol is advisable. Awareness of measurement error limitations in MScanFit MUNE underscores its applicability in making longitudinal clinical decisions for individual patients.
Title: Impact of reference electrode position on motor unit number estimation (MUNE) in the tibialis anterior muscle using MScanFit: test-retest reliability
Description:
Abstract Objectives This study aimed to assess the effect of varying the reference electrode position, specifically comparing position A3 (medial patella) to routine position 1 (R1) and the MScan multicenter protocol position (M1), on compound muscle action potential (CMAP) and motor unit number estimation (MUNE) in the tibialis anterior muscle of healthy participants.
Methods Twenty healthy participants underwent repeated MScanFit MUNE assessments with a 7-14 day interval between tests.
The reference electrode (E2) was placed in three positions at each visit (A3, R1, and M1), while the active electrode (E1) remained constant.
An additional seventeen participants were included to establish the minimal detectable true change in MUNE values using MScanFit, with the reference electrode exclusively in the M1 position.
Results The reference electrode position significantly influenced CMAP and MUNE, with R1 resulting in lower values.
However, no significant difference was observed between M1 and A3 positions.
Relative and absolute reliability indicators favored using the M1 position for reference in MScanFit MUNE.
In a combined dataset of 37 healthy participants, the average tibialis anterior muscle motor unit count was estimated at 148 (SD 25.
2), with a minimal detectable true change of 55 units.
Conclusions The preference for the M1 position over the alternative A3 position is supported, particularly for MScanFit MUNE assessments in the tibialis anterior muscle.
Clinically, a true change in MUNE should consider the minimal detectable change of 55 motor units, underscoring the reality that large changes in MUNE are required to conclude a genuine change beyond measurement error.
Significance For MUNE examinations of the tibialis anterior muscle, adhering to the electrode positions outlined in the MScan multicenter protocol is advisable.
Awareness of measurement error limitations in MScanFit MUNE underscores its applicability in making longitudinal clinical decisions for individual patients.

Related Results

Physiological robustness of MScanFit to simulated motor unit loss and remodelling
Physiological robustness of MScanFit to simulated motor unit loss and remodelling
Introduction MScanFit estimates motor unit number and size from compound muscle action potential (CMAP) scans, but its accuracy may depend on the physiological pr...
Poster 247: Muscle ERRγ Overexpression Mitigates the Muscle Atrophy after ACL injury
Poster 247: Muscle ERRγ Overexpression Mitigates the Muscle Atrophy after ACL injury
Objectives: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is the 6th most common orthopedic procedure performed in the United States (1,2). There is substanti...
Facilitation-inhibition control of motor neuronal persistent inward currents in young and older adults
Facilitation-inhibition control of motor neuronal persistent inward currents in young and older adults
ABSTRACT A well-coordinated control of motor neuronal persistent inward currents (PICs) via diffuse neuromodulation and local inhibition is essen...
Motor unit changes in children with symptomatic spinal muscular atrophy treated with nusinersen
Motor unit changes in children with symptomatic spinal muscular atrophy treated with nusinersen
ObjectivesTo elucidate the motor unit response to intrathecal nusinersen in children with symptomatic spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) using a novel motor unit number estimation techn...
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Abstract Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex and often overlooked condition caused by the compression of neurovascular structures as they pass through the thoracic outlet. ...
Provocative Tests in Diagnosis of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Narrative Review
Provocative Tests in Diagnosis of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Narrative Review
Abstract Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a group of conditions caused by the compression of the neurovascular bundle within the thoracic outlet. It is classified into three main ...
Effect of recording window and stimulation variables on the statistical technique of motor unit number estimation
Effect of recording window and stimulation variables on the statistical technique of motor unit number estimation
AbstractA variety of methods are used for the selection of recording window sizes and stimulation current levels for statistical motor unit number estimation (MUNE). This study com...

Back to Top