Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Sargonic and Ur III Empires
View through CrossRef
Abstract
This chapter surveys the history of arguably the two earliest empires on record, both of which originated in Mesopotamia (ancient Iraq). The first of them was founded, ca. 2350 bce, by Sargon of Akkade, reaching the apex of its power under Sargon’s grandson Naram-Suen. The Akkadian rulers conquered an area extending from eastern Iran to Anatolia, a feat that was not to be replicated until the times of the Neo-Assyrian Empire in the first millennium bce. However, the Sargonic Empire, which lasted roughly 150 years, never developed an articulated system of imperial control over the conquered territories, its basic raison-d’être rather being the control and exploitation of trade routes. After a passage of roughly one century, another imperial experiment was undertaken, ca. 2050 bce, by a king of Ur named Šulgi. The empire of Ur had clearly been inspired by the Sargonic example, as it was motivated by similar economic and ideological objectives. While the extent of Ur’s territorial expansion was much more limited, Šulgi and his successors were able to create an exquisitely designed mini-empire, whose operations were guided by a characteristically self-limiting (and largely defensive) strategy, and which was much more internally cohesive and better organized than Sargon’s creation. In spite of its seeming perfection, this—equally brief—imperial experiment also failed, even more resoundingly than the Sargonic one. The causes of the collapse of the two empires are considered in detail.
Title: The Sargonic and Ur III Empires
Description:
Abstract
This chapter surveys the history of arguably the two earliest empires on record, both of which originated in Mesopotamia (ancient Iraq).
The first of them was founded, ca.
2350 bce, by Sargon of Akkade, reaching the apex of its power under Sargon’s grandson Naram-Suen.
The Akkadian rulers conquered an area extending from eastern Iran to Anatolia, a feat that was not to be replicated until the times of the Neo-Assyrian Empire in the first millennium bce.
However, the Sargonic Empire, which lasted roughly 150 years, never developed an articulated system of imperial control over the conquered territories, its basic raison-d’être rather being the control and exploitation of trade routes.
After a passage of roughly one century, another imperial experiment was undertaken, ca.
2050 bce, by a king of Ur named Šulgi.
The empire of Ur had clearly been inspired by the Sargonic example, as it was motivated by similar economic and ideological objectives.
While the extent of Ur’s territorial expansion was much more limited, Šulgi and his successors were able to create an exquisitely designed mini-empire, whose operations were guided by a characteristically self-limiting (and largely defensive) strategy, and which was much more internally cohesive and better organized than Sargon’s creation.
In spite of its seeming perfection, this—equally brief—imperial experiment also failed, even more resoundingly than the Sargonic one.
The causes of the collapse of the two empires are considered in detail.
Related Results
Sorption Behaviors of Light Lanthanides(III) (La(III), Ce(III), Pr(III), Nd(III)) and Cr(III) Using Nitrolite
Sorption Behaviors of Light Lanthanides(III) (La(III), Ce(III), Pr(III), Nd(III)) and Cr(III) Using Nitrolite
The sorption of light lanthanides(III) (La(III), Ce(III), Pr(III), Nd(III)) and chromium(III) ions from acidic solutions on Nitrolite was studied at varying ions concentrations, pH...
Tidlig neolitiske anlæg ved Tolstrup
Tidlig neolitiske anlæg ved Tolstrup
Early Neolithic structures at Tolstrup near Løgstør In 1965, excavation revealed Early Neolithic structures of the Funnel Beaker culture at the village of Tolstrup, not far east o...
DNA Cleavage and Trypanosomes Death by a Combination of Alamar Blue and Au(III)
DNA Cleavage and Trypanosomes Death by a Combination of Alamar Blue and Au(III)
Alamar Blue test indicates toxicity of Au(III), but Au(III) ion itself is not toxic in vitro and does not cleave DNA. However, combination of Alamar Blue and Au(III) cleaved DNA t...
DNA Cleavage and Trypanosomes Death by a Combination of Alamar Blue and Au(III)
DNA Cleavage and Trypanosomes Death by a Combination of Alamar Blue and Au(III)
Alamar Blue test indicates toxicity of Au(III), but Au(III) ion itself is not toxic in vitro and does not cleave DNA. However, combination of Alamar Blue and Au(III) cleaved DNA t...
A New Light on the Hamazi Kingdom
A New Light on the Hamazi Kingdom
Abstract Hamazi kingdom/city was an important ancient kingdom/city in the east of Tigris. The cuneiform texts show that it had a great character among the cities in the land of Su...
Empire and State Formation
Empire and State Formation
Historical writing on empire and state formation is undergoing a kind of global renaissance for a host of complex reasons, including the rapid political reconfigurations accompanyi...
Freemasonry across Empires
Freemasonry across Empires
Examining British imperial freemasonry in light of the French, Dutch, and Danish colonial empires, this article argues that freemasonry and European imperialism developed a complex...
ECONOMIC POLICY OF EUROPEAN MEDIEVAL EMPIRES
ECONOMIC POLICY OF EUROPEAN MEDIEVAL EMPIRES
This article presents a comprehensive analysis of the economic policies pursued by the leading European medieval empires, with particular attention to the Frankish, Byzantine, Holy...

