Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Philosophers Bozidar Knezevic and Branislav Petronijevic: Between myth and reality

View through CrossRef
In literature on Serbian history of philosophy it is quite usual to find a statement that Branislav Petronijevic (1875-1954), professor of philosophy at the Belgrade Faculty of Philosophy thwarted the efforts of the philosopher and historian Bozidar Knezevic (1862-1905) to become a professor at the same Faculty. It is said that Petronijevic wrote a negative official review on Knezevic?s book Principles of History. The story fits well with the negative myth of Petronijevic. To establish the facts it is important to take into account the chronology, archival materials, memoirs and other historical sources. When Knezevic applied for the position of a professor of general history at the Belgrade Faculty of Philosophy Petronijevic was a 21 years old student at the University of Leipzig (1897). Ljubomir Nedic, then a professor of philosophy at the Belgrade Faculty of Philosophy, recommended publishing Knezevic?s first volume of Principles of History (1898). In the meantime Knezevic did not apply for the position of a professor of History of Philosophy and Ethics (February, 1898). Petronijevic did not write an official review on Knezevic?s manuscript, but a review of an already published book (September, 1898). The Principal educational council of the Ministry of Education of the Kingdom of Serbia asked Nedic to write an official review of the manuscript of the second volume of Knezevic?s Principle of History (1899). Since Nedic couldn?t accept it, the newly elected professor Petronijevic wrote a review of Knezevic?s new manuscript. Although critical and analytical, the review was positive and the book was published (1901).
National Library of Serbia
Title: Philosophers Bozidar Knezevic and Branislav Petronijevic: Between myth and reality
Description:
In literature on Serbian history of philosophy it is quite usual to find a statement that Branislav Petronijevic (1875-1954), professor of philosophy at the Belgrade Faculty of Philosophy thwarted the efforts of the philosopher and historian Bozidar Knezevic (1862-1905) to become a professor at the same Faculty.
It is said that Petronijevic wrote a negative official review on Knezevic?s book Principles of History.
The story fits well with the negative myth of Petronijevic.
To establish the facts it is important to take into account the chronology, archival materials, memoirs and other historical sources.
When Knezevic applied for the position of a professor of general history at the Belgrade Faculty of Philosophy Petronijevic was a 21 years old student at the University of Leipzig (1897).
Ljubomir Nedic, then a professor of philosophy at the Belgrade Faculty of Philosophy, recommended publishing Knezevic?s first volume of Principles of History (1898).
In the meantime Knezevic did not apply for the position of a professor of History of Philosophy and Ethics (February, 1898).
Petronijevic did not write an official review on Knezevic?s manuscript, but a review of an already published book (September, 1898).
The Principal educational council of the Ministry of Education of the Kingdom of Serbia asked Nedic to write an official review of the manuscript of the second volume of Knezevic?s Principle of History (1899).
Since Nedic couldn?t accept it, the newly elected professor Petronijevic wrote a review of Knezevic?s new manuscript.
Although critical and analytical, the review was positive and the book was published (1901).

Related Results

Kritik Mitos Tentang “Hang Tuah” Karya Amir Hamzah
Kritik Mitos Tentang “Hang Tuah” Karya Amir Hamzah
This study reveals the myth criticism on rhyme "Hang Tuah", an Amir Hamzah’s work expressing Malay myth. The Malay myth found in the rhyme "Hang Tuah" is placed as a meeting place ...
Comparing cybersickness in virtual reality and mixed reality head-mounted displays
Comparing cybersickness in virtual reality and mixed reality head-mounted displays
Introduction: Defence Research and Development Canada is developing guidance on the use of Mixed Reality head-mounted displays for naval operations in the Royal Canadian Navy. Virt...
If I Had Possession over Judgment Day: Augmenting Robert Johnson
If I Had Possession over Judgment Day: Augmenting Robert Johnson
augmentvb [ɔːgˈmɛnt]1. to make or become greater in number, amount, strength, etc.; increase2. Music: to increase (a major or perfect interval) by a semitone (Collins English Dicti...
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1770–1831)
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1770–1831)
Hegel was the last of the main representatives of a philosophical movement known as German Idealism, which developed towards the end of the eighteenth century primarily as a reacti...
SYMBOL AND LEGAL MYTH
SYMBOL AND LEGAL MYTH
The aim of this paper is to prove the hypothesis: symbol plays a decisive role in the process of legal myth-making; it occupies a central place in the structure of the legal myth. ...
Myth and Victorian Literature
Myth and Victorian Literature
Myth is a prominent part of the Victorian engagement with the past and the present, and myths were essential to the Victorians’ conception of themselves. Before the eighteenth cent...
Mitos Keris dalam Novel Hunus Karya Sunaryono Basuki Ks
Mitos Keris dalam Novel Hunus Karya Sunaryono Basuki Ks
The object of this study was the novel Hunus by Sunaryono Basuki Ks. The novel Hunus was analyzed by using theory of structure and theory of literature sociology. The using of theo...
Mytens tvang
Mytens tvang
The purpose of the article is to show how the negative dialectics of Adorno gets involved with a concept of myth that is questionable in several respects. First of all, Adorno trie...

Back to Top