Javascript must be enabled to continue!
PENGGUNAAN SPELLING CORRECTION DENGAN METODE PETER NORVIG DAN N-GRAM
View through CrossRef
Typing errors in a document are human errors that are difficult to avoid as a result of which the message to be conveyed is not optimal. Using the Spelling Corrector feature is one way to check typing errors. The Spelling Corrector feature is able to provide only one word suggestion and correct it immediately. The combination of Peter Norvig and Ngram's methods was able to come up with one word suggestion and correct it right away. Both methods of looking for word suggestions use the probability value of the words that appear most frequently in the dictionary. The difference between the two methods is that Peter Norvig uses an algorithm that combines the delete, insert, replace, and transpose processes for the wrong word. Meanwhile, Ngram uses an algorithm that pays attention to the words before and after them based on the sentences in the dictionary. The dictionary used is a dictionary of word lists from KBBI and also a dictionary of sentences taken from several articles on the internet. This combination of methods was tested using 55 documents containing sentences that had one misspelled word. The test results show that the combination of the two methods provides an accuracy rate of 73,684% and a success rate of 37,037% for the total accuracy of this application is 69.09%. These two methods can be used to correct typing errors, although they cannot correct words with an error rate of two or more letters. This is because Peter Norvig was unable to correct a word with a two-letter error rate and needed a good corpus.
Universitas Tarumanagara
Title: PENGGUNAAN SPELLING CORRECTION DENGAN METODE PETER NORVIG DAN N-GRAM
Description:
Typing errors in a document are human errors that are difficult to avoid as a result of which the message to be conveyed is not optimal.
Using the Spelling Corrector feature is one way to check typing errors.
The Spelling Corrector feature is able to provide only one word suggestion and correct it immediately.
The combination of Peter Norvig and Ngram's methods was able to come up with one word suggestion and correct it right away.
Both methods of looking for word suggestions use the probability value of the words that appear most frequently in the dictionary.
The difference between the two methods is that Peter Norvig uses an algorithm that combines the delete, insert, replace, and transpose processes for the wrong word.
Meanwhile, Ngram uses an algorithm that pays attention to the words before and after them based on the sentences in the dictionary.
The dictionary used is a dictionary of word lists from KBBI and also a dictionary of sentences taken from several articles on the internet.
This combination of methods was tested using 55 documents containing sentences that had one misspelled word.
The test results show that the combination of the two methods provides an accuracy rate of 73,684% and a success rate of 37,037% for the total accuracy of this application is 69.
09%.
These two methods can be used to correct typing errors, although they cannot correct words with an error rate of two or more letters.
This is because Peter Norvig was unable to correct a word with a two-letter error rate and needed a good corpus.
Related Results
FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI MORTALITAS PADA PASIEN DENGAN FRAKTUR COSTA: Literature Review
FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI MORTALITAS PADA PASIEN DENGAN FRAKTUR COSTA: Literature Review
FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI MORTALITAS PADA PASIEN DENGAN FRAKTUR COSTA: Literature Review Anna Tri Wahyuni1), Masfuri2), Liya Arista3)1,2,3 Fakultas Ilmu Keperawatan Univers...
Spelling Corrector Bahasa Indonesia dengan Kombinasi Metode Peter Norvig dan N-Gram
Spelling Corrector Bahasa Indonesia dengan Kombinasi Metode Peter Norvig dan N-Gram
Abstrak - Kesalahan pengetikan dalam suatu dokumen merupakan human error yang sulit dihindari, akibatnya pesan yang ingin disampaikan tidak maksimal. Menggunakan fitur Spelling Cor...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract
Introduction
Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
COMPARISON OF SPELL CORRECTION IN BAHASA INDONESIA: PETER NORVIG, LSTM, AND N-GRAM
COMPARISON OF SPELL CORRECTION IN BAHASA INDONESIA: PETER NORVIG, LSTM, AND N-GRAM
This study conducts a comprehensive comparison of spell-checking methods in Bahasa Indonesia, specifically focusing on three approaches: Peter Norvig's method, Long Short-Term Memo...
Deteksi dan Koreksi Kesalahan Pengetikan Berbasis KBBI Menggunakan Algoritma Peter Norvig
Deteksi dan Koreksi Kesalahan Pengetikan Berbasis KBBI Menggunakan Algoritma Peter Norvig
With the advent of the digital age, there has been an explosion in the volume of written material; however, this increase has also been accompanied by an alarmingly high error rate...
The contributions of reading and phonological awareness for spelling in grade three isiXhosa learners
The contributions of reading and phonological awareness for spelling in grade three isiXhosa learners
One factor, which is consistently highlighted in research on literacy, is the lack of understanding of how literacy develops in the Southern-Bantu languages. In particular, little ...
The Development of Spelling Ability in Emerging Literates: An Investigation of Different Models
The Development of Spelling Ability in Emerging Literates: An Investigation of Different Models
Purpose – The aim of this paper is to analyse the existing models of spelling development. Researchers who have observed children’s writing have not been able to reach a consensus ...

