Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Is Upper Pole Puncture for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) Safe and Effective?

View through CrossRef
Introduction: During this modern era of surgery, where miniaturization has taken a front row seat, endo-urology is flourishing like never before. PCNL has become the chosen tool for treating Staghorn stones, large renal calculi and complex upper ureteric calculi. The renal collecting system can be accessed by upper or lower pole puncture. Lower pole access is considered safer with fewer complications; however the benefits of upper pole access for PCNL also stands tall due to direct access to the most of renal calyxes system, renal pelvis and upper ureter. A lot of debate and confusion is recorded worldwide with respect to both methods. Aims & Objectives: To determine the outcome of upper pole access for removal of renal stones in patients undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Place and duration of study: A descriptive study, conducted in Department of Urology, SIMS/SHL, in 2 year period i.e. 1-02-2018 to 31-01-2020. Material & Methods: A Total of 62 patients fulfilling selection criteria were included in the study. All of these cases were operated under general anesthesia. Post-operatively, patients X-ray K.U.B were performed for presence or absence of stone. If there was no stone found in x-ray, then efficacy was labeled as high. Regarding complications, patients were evaluated for presence of hydrothorax and bleeding. If there was no complication, then safety was labeled as adequate. All this information was recorded on proforma. Results: The mean age of patients was 32.58±9.41 years. There were 29 (46.8%) males and 33 (53.2%) females. The mean size of stone was 2.50±0.50mm. In this study, 20 (32.3%) patients had one stone, 25 (40.3%) had two stones and 17 (27.4%) had three stones. High Efficacy of PCNL was achieved in 50 (80.6%) patients while PCNL was adequately safe in 45 (72.6%) cases while 17 (27.4%) patients had complications. Conclusion: This study showed that PCNL with upper pole approach was found to be highly effective in renal stone removal and is also safe in more than 70 % of cases.
Title: Is Upper Pole Puncture for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) Safe and Effective?
Description:
Introduction: During this modern era of surgery, where miniaturization has taken a front row seat, endo-urology is flourishing like never before.
PCNL has become the chosen tool for treating Staghorn stones, large renal calculi and complex upper ureteric calculi.
The renal collecting system can be accessed by upper or lower pole puncture.
Lower pole access is considered safer with fewer complications; however the benefits of upper pole access for PCNL also stands tall due to direct access to the most of renal calyxes system, renal pelvis and upper ureter.
A lot of debate and confusion is recorded worldwide with respect to both methods.
Aims & Objectives: To determine the outcome of upper pole access for removal of renal stones in patients undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.
Place and duration of study: A descriptive study, conducted in Department of Urology, SIMS/SHL, in 2 year period i.
e.
1-02-2018 to 31-01-2020.
Material & Methods: A Total of 62 patients fulfilling selection criteria were included in the study.
All of these cases were operated under general anesthesia.
Post-operatively, patients X-ray K.
U.
B were performed for presence or absence of stone.
If there was no stone found in x-ray, then efficacy was labeled as high.
Regarding complications, patients were evaluated for presence of hydrothorax and bleeding.
If there was no complication, then safety was labeled as adequate.
All this information was recorded on proforma.
Results: The mean age of patients was 32.
58±9.
41 years.
There were 29 (46.
8%) males and 33 (53.
2%) females.
The mean size of stone was 2.
50±0.
50mm.
In this study, 20 (32.
3%) patients had one stone, 25 (40.
3%) had two stones and 17 (27.
4%) had three stones.
High Efficacy of PCNL was achieved in 50 (80.
6%) patients while PCNL was adequately safe in 45 (72.
6%) cases while 17 (27.
4%) patients had complications.
Conclusion: This study showed that PCNL with upper pole approach was found to be highly effective in renal stone removal and is also safe in more than 70 % of cases.

Related Results

Ultrasound versus fluoroscopy as imaging guidance for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Ultrasound versus fluoroscopy as imaging guidance for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
AbstractObjectivesTo determine whether the outcomes of ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UG-PCNL), an alternative to traditional fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephr...
A 3D Printing Personalized Percutaneous Nephroscope Puncture Guide Plate in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Pilot Study
A 3D Printing Personalized Percutaneous Nephroscope Puncture Guide Plate in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Pilot Study
Abstract Objective Using CTU, combined with 3D printing technology, digital design, the development of individualized PCNL) puncture guides, preliminary discussion of its f...
Development of a novel percutaneous digital flexible nephroscope: its use and application
Development of a novel percutaneous digital flexible nephroscope: its use and application
Abstract Background Renal calculi are one of the most frequent diseases in urology, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) being the gold standard ...
Current advances in pain regimens for percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Current advances in pain regimens for percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) causes pain and discomfort after surgery. The primary causes of immediate postoperative pain after PCNL are visceral pain from the...
Hydroperitoneum: A complication of mini PCNL in pediatric age group? -A case report
Hydroperitoneum: A complication of mini PCNL in pediatric age group? -A case report
Abstract Renal stones constitute 40% of renal disorders in Pakistan with silent stones constituting up to 3%.  Nephrolithotomy and Pyelolithotomy were the only surgical optio...
Comparative evaluation of upper versus lower calyceal approach in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (1) for managing renal calculi
Comparative evaluation of upper versus lower calyceal approach in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (1) for managing renal calculi
  Abstract Objective: To compare upper versus lower calyceal approaches in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for managing renal calculi. Method: The retrospective stud...
Efficacy and Safety of Treatment Options for Large Upper Ureteral Stone
Efficacy and Safety of Treatment Options for Large Upper Ureteral Stone
Background: There are three minimally invasive methods for the treatment of large (>1 cm) upper ureteral stones: ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (...

Back to Top