Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Conformational analysis of polytripeptides (Gly‐Pro‐Ala)n, (Gly‐Ala‐Hyp)n, and (Gly‐Ala‐Ala)n in connection with the problem of collagen structure

View through CrossRef
AbstractConformational analysis of triple helics of a type of collagen was performed with typical collagen tripeptide sequences based on Gly‐Pro‐Ala, Gly‐Ala‐Hyp, and Gly‐Ala‐Ala. During energy minimization, the possibility of continual deformation of the pyrrolidine cycle was taken into account in order to achieve better accuracy in the resulting structure. The (Gly‐Pro‐Ala)n structure is almost isomorphic to the (Gly‐Pro‐Hyp)n structure obtained in the previous work [Tumanyan, V. G. & Esipova, N.G. (1982) Biopolymers 21, 475–497]. For a collagen‐type structure, the optimal conformation of (Gly‐Ala‐Hyp)n tends to have a decreased unit twist (t = 15°), although the energy advantage with respect to the conformation with t = 45° is not so significant. A similar situation is observed for (Gly‐Ala‐Ala)n. In this case, the energy decrease during unwinding to t = 15° from t = 45° is quite small. The conformations of (Gly‐Ala‐Hyp)n and (Gly‐Ala‐Ala)n with t = 15° exhibit a similarity with a triple complex of polyproline II helices—a noncoiled coil such as (Gly‐Pro‐Hyp)n and (Gly‐Pro‐Ala)n. A similar structure may be postulated for subcomponent cq1 of the first component of a human complement containing substantial Gly‐X‐Pro and Gly‐X‐Y tripeptide derivatives in the primary structure (X, Y = any amino acid). The results suggest that the observed helical symmetry of collagen (t = 36°) is a consequence of superposition of diffraction patterns (for sufficiently long segments) from various helices (t varies from ∼15° for Gly‐X‐Hyp and Gly‐X‐Y to ∼56° for Gly‐Pro‐Ala). For short alternating segments, some unification of different helical structures is possible.
Title: Conformational analysis of polytripeptides (Gly‐Pro‐Ala)n, (Gly‐Ala‐Hyp)n, and (Gly‐Ala‐Ala)n in connection with the problem of collagen structure
Description:
AbstractConformational analysis of triple helics of a type of collagen was performed with typical collagen tripeptide sequences based on Gly‐Pro‐Ala, Gly‐Ala‐Hyp, and Gly‐Ala‐Ala.
During energy minimization, the possibility of continual deformation of the pyrrolidine cycle was taken into account in order to achieve better accuracy in the resulting structure.
The (Gly‐Pro‐Ala)n structure is almost isomorphic to the (Gly‐Pro‐Hyp)n structure obtained in the previous work [Tumanyan, V.
G.
& Esipova, N.
G.
(1982) Biopolymers 21, 475–497].
For a collagen‐type structure, the optimal conformation of (Gly‐Ala‐Hyp)n tends to have a decreased unit twist (t = 15°), although the energy advantage with respect to the conformation with t = 45° is not so significant.
A similar situation is observed for (Gly‐Ala‐Ala)n.
In this case, the energy decrease during unwinding to t = 15° from t = 45° is quite small.
The conformations of (Gly‐Ala‐Hyp)n and (Gly‐Ala‐Ala)n with t = 15° exhibit a similarity with a triple complex of polyproline II helices—a noncoiled coil such as (Gly‐Pro‐Hyp)n and (Gly‐Pro‐Ala)n.
A similar structure may be postulated for subcomponent cq1 of the first component of a human complement containing substantial Gly‐X‐Pro and Gly‐X‐Y tripeptide derivatives in the primary structure (X, Y = any amino acid).
The results suggest that the observed helical symmetry of collagen (t = 36°) is a consequence of superposition of diffraction patterns (for sufficiently long segments) from various helices (t varies from ∼15° for Gly‐X‐Hyp and Gly‐X‐Y to ∼56° for Gly‐Pro‐Ala).
For short alternating segments, some unification of different helical structures is possible.

Related Results

Pharmacokinetics of collagen dipeptides (Gly–Pro and Pro–Hyp) and tripeptides (Gly–Pro–Hyp) in rats
Pharmacokinetics of collagen dipeptides (Gly–Pro and Pro–Hyp) and tripeptides (Gly–Pro–Hyp) in rats
Abstract Although systemic exposure to peptides, such as Gly–Pro–Hyp, Pro–Hyp, and Gly–Pro, has been reported following administration of collagen hydrolysates ...
Experimental investigations on the backbone folding of proline‐containing model tripeptides
Experimental investigations on the backbone folding of proline‐containing model tripeptides
AbstractSome proline‐containing tripeptides with the general formulas R0CO‐L‐Pro‐X‐NHR3 (X = Gly,Sar,L‐Ala,D‐Ala) and R0CO‐X‐L‐Pro‐NHR3 (X = Gly,L‐Ala,D‐Ala) have been investigated...
Uv damage of collagen: Insights from model collagen peptides
Uv damage of collagen: Insights from model collagen peptides
AbstractFibrils of Type I collagen in the skin are exposed to ultraviolet (UV) light and there have been claims that collagen photo‐degradation leads to wrinkles and may contribute...
Plasma hydroxyproline, MMP‐7 and collagen I as novel predictive risk markers of hepatobiliary disease‐associated cholangiocarcinoma
Plasma hydroxyproline, MMP‐7 and collagen I as novel predictive risk markers of hepatobiliary disease‐associated cholangiocarcinoma
AbstractChronic opisthorchiasis caused by Opisthorchis viverrini infection is characterized by advanced periductal fibrosis leading to hepatobiliary diseases (HBD), including chola...
Abstract LB-009: Collagen regulation in postpartum mammary gland involution, a novel breast cancer prevention target
Abstract LB-009: Collagen regulation in postpartum mammary gland involution, a novel breast cancer prevention target
Abstract Collagen is the most abundant extracellular protein in breast tissue and plays a critical role in breast cancer progression. Intravital imaging shows collag...
A Model In Vitro Study Using Hypericin: Tumor-Versus Necrosis-Targeting Property and Possible Mechanisms
A Model In Vitro Study Using Hypericin: Tumor-Versus Necrosis-Targeting Property and Possible Mechanisms
Hypericin (Hyp) had been explored as a tumor-seeking agent for years; however, more recent studies showed its necrosis-avidity rather than cancer-seeking property. To further look ...

Back to Top