Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Duration of Methadone and Buprenorphine-Naloxone Treatment

View through CrossRef
ImportanceFentanyl has spread through the illicit opioid supply in Canada, driving increasing overdose deaths. However, the effectiveness of methadone and buprenorphine-naloxone in treating opioid use disorder during the fentanyl era is unknown.ObjectiveTo evaluate methadone and buprenorphine-naloxone treatment duration, a core effectiveness outcome in the treatment of opioid use disorder, in Ontario, Canada, between 2014 and 2022.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis population-based, retrospective cohort study included individuals who initiated methadone or buprenorphine-naloxone between January 2014 and December 2022 in Ontario, Canada. Data were analyzed from July 18, 2023, to June 11, 2025.ExposurePeriod of medication initiation (2014-2016, 2017-2019, or 2020-2022).Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe main outcome was treatment duration, measured as time to medication discontinuation (5 consecutive days without dispensation of the initial opioid agonist treatment or availability of take-home doses).ResultsThe cohort included 72 717 new recipients of opioid agonist treatments (45 256 [62.2%] male; median [IQR] age, 35 [28-46] years), with 34 538 individuals (47.5%) receiving methadone and 38 179 individuals (52.5%) receiving buprenorphine-naloxone. Among individuals starting methadone, median treatment duration decreased from 193 (95% CI, 185-202) days in 2014 to 2016 to 139 (95% CI, 130-149) days in 2017 to 2019 and 86 (95% CI, 78-95) days in 2020 to 2022. Among individuals starting buprenorphine-naloxone, median treatment duration decreased from 51 (95% CI, 49-54) days in 2014 to 2016 and 50 (95% CI, 48-53) days in 2017 to 2019 to 38 (95% CI, 36-40) days in 2020 to 2022. In adjusted Cox regression models including time-varying effects and using 2014 to 2016 as the reference period, hazards of discontinuation measured at treatment initiation were higher during later periods of methadone initiation (2017-2019: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.18 [95% CI, 1.15-1.22]; P < .001; 2020-2022: aHR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.39-1.51]; P < .001) and for buprenorphine-naloxone initiation in 2020 to 2022 (aHR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.08-1.15]; P < .001). Age categories, neighborhood income quintile, rurality, sex, and number of comorbidities were also associated with time to discontinuation in adjusted models.Conclusions and RelevanceThis cohort study found that treatment duration among individuals starting methadone and buprenorphine-naloxone during 2020 to 2022 was lower than during 2014 to 2016. This study highlights the importance of ongoing evaluation of treatment effectiveness, given the dynamic nature of the opioid crisis. Further research is needed to improve treatment retention and improve the effectiveness of opioid use disorder treatment.
American Medical Association (AMA)
Title: Duration of Methadone and Buprenorphine-Naloxone Treatment
Description:
ImportanceFentanyl has spread through the illicit opioid supply in Canada, driving increasing overdose deaths.
However, the effectiveness of methadone and buprenorphine-naloxone in treating opioid use disorder during the fentanyl era is unknown.
ObjectiveTo evaluate methadone and buprenorphine-naloxone treatment duration, a core effectiveness outcome in the treatment of opioid use disorder, in Ontario, Canada, between 2014 and 2022.
Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis population-based, retrospective cohort study included individuals who initiated methadone or buprenorphine-naloxone between January 2014 and December 2022 in Ontario, Canada.
Data were analyzed from July 18, 2023, to June 11, 2025.
ExposurePeriod of medication initiation (2014-2016, 2017-2019, or 2020-2022).
Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe main outcome was treatment duration, measured as time to medication discontinuation (5 consecutive days without dispensation of the initial opioid agonist treatment or availability of take-home doses).
ResultsThe cohort included 72 717 new recipients of opioid agonist treatments (45 256 [62.
2%] male; median [IQR] age, 35 [28-46] years), with 34 538 individuals (47.
5%) receiving methadone and 38 179 individuals (52.
5%) receiving buprenorphine-naloxone.
Among individuals starting methadone, median treatment duration decreased from 193 (95% CI, 185-202) days in 2014 to 2016 to 139 (95% CI, 130-149) days in 2017 to 2019 and 86 (95% CI, 78-95) days in 2020 to 2022.
Among individuals starting buprenorphine-naloxone, median treatment duration decreased from 51 (95% CI, 49-54) days in 2014 to 2016 and 50 (95% CI, 48-53) days in 2017 to 2019 to 38 (95% CI, 36-40) days in 2020 to 2022.
In adjusted Cox regression models including time-varying effects and using 2014 to 2016 as the reference period, hazards of discontinuation measured at treatment initiation were higher during later periods of methadone initiation (2017-2019: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.
18 [95% CI, 1.
15-1.
22]; P < .
001; 2020-2022: aHR, 1.
45 [95% CI, 1.
39-1.
51]; P < .
001) and for buprenorphine-naloxone initiation in 2020 to 2022 (aHR, 1.
11 [95% CI, 1.
08-1.
15]; P < .
001).
Age categories, neighborhood income quintile, rurality, sex, and number of comorbidities were also associated with time to discontinuation in adjusted models.
Conclusions and RelevanceThis cohort study found that treatment duration among individuals starting methadone and buprenorphine-naloxone during 2020 to 2022 was lower than during 2014 to 2016.
This study highlights the importance of ongoing evaluation of treatment effectiveness, given the dynamic nature of the opioid crisis.
Further research is needed to improve treatment retention and improve the effectiveness of opioid use disorder treatment.

Related Results

Clinical Pharmacology of Methadone in Infants and Children
Clinical Pharmacology of Methadone in Infants and Children
Methadone is a long-acting µ opioid receptor agonist with pharmacological properties qualitatively similar to those of morphine, is a racemate, consists in R-methadone and S-methad...
An Investigation of Medical Examiner Cases in Which Methadone Was Detected, Harris County, Texas, 1987–1992
An Investigation of Medical Examiner Cases in Which Methadone Was Detected, Harris County, Texas, 1987–1992
Abstract In 1991, media reports of an increase in the number of deaths attributed to methadone toxicity in Harris County, Texas, raised public concern about the safe...
Naloxone Use for Opioid Reversal in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease
Naloxone Use for Opioid Reversal in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease
Abstract Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) are known to require increased dosing of drugs including opioids due to differences in renal and hepatic metabolism....
Naloxone Knowledge, Carrying, Purchase, and Use
Naloxone Knowledge, Carrying, Purchase, and Use
ImportanceWidespread naloxone access is a key policy response to the opioid crisis. Naloxone availability is typically estimated from pharmacy sales, which exclude naloxone provide...
The Effects of Prenatal Buprenorphine Exposure on the Neurobehavioral Development of the Child
The Effects of Prenatal Buprenorphine Exposure on the Neurobehavioral Development of the Child
Background: Current guidelines for pregnant women with substance use disorder advise prenatal maintenance of opioid agonist therapy with either buprenorphine or methadone. Despite ...
Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Converting Adults with Sickle Cell Disease from Full Agonist Opioids to Buprenorphine
Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Converting Adults with Sickle Cell Disease from Full Agonist Opioids to Buprenorphine
Abstract Background: The management of pain in adults with sickle cell disease (SCD) is complex, with the intermingling of both acute vaso-occlusive events and chron...

Back to Top