Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Possessive agreement in Insular Celtic

View through CrossRef
Possessive agreement is a pattern of NP-internal agreement in which certain features of the possessor (usually person, number and/or gender) are marked twice within the NP: firstly, on the possessive marker itself (e. g. a possessive pronoun) and secondly, on another morpheme, which obligatorily agrees in those features with the possessive marker (Corbett 2006: 47). This type of agreement is not common in Indo-European languages, but it is in Uralic and several other language families in Eurasia (Koptjevskaja-Tamm 2003). However, Goidelic and Brittonic have constructions falling under the above definition in which the pronominal possessor can be marked by two pronominal elements which have to agree in person, number and (in the third person singular) gender. In both languages, the first pronominal element is the proclitic possessive pronoun. In Old Irish, the second pronominal element referring to the possessor is traditionally called the “emphasizing particle, or nota augens” (Thurneysen 1946: 252–3, Griffith 2008), and it distinguishes the same categories as the possessive pronouns. The second pronominal element in Middle Welsh is identical to the stressed simple personal pronouns. This paper investigates the phenomenon of possessive agreement in Insular Celtic by examining the frequencies of possessive constructions with agreement in selected Old Irish and Middle Welsh texts, and seeking to establish the pragmatic functions of these constructions. Additionally, by looking at the earliest attestations of constructions with possessive agreement it will be shown that it is unlikely that they should be reconstructed in Proto-Insular Celtic (or even Proto-Celtic). Rather, it is argued that possessive agreement in Insular Celtic developed as an areal phenomenon which arose in situations of intensive language contact that occurred in Britain and Ireland during the Early Middle Ages (Matasović 2007).
Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan
Title: Possessive agreement in Insular Celtic
Description:
Possessive agreement is a pattern of NP-internal agreement in which certain features of the possessor (usually person, number and/or gender) are marked twice within the NP: firstly, on the possessive marker itself (e.
g.
a possessive pronoun) and secondly, on another morpheme, which obligatorily agrees in those features with the possessive marker (Corbett 2006: 47).
This type of agreement is not common in Indo-European languages, but it is in Uralic and several other language families in Eurasia (Koptjevskaja-Tamm 2003).
However, Goidelic and Brittonic have constructions falling under the above definition in which the pronominal possessor can be marked by two pronominal elements which have to agree in person, number and (in the third person singular) gender.
In both languages, the first pronominal element is the proclitic possessive pronoun.
In Old Irish, the second pronominal element referring to the possessor is traditionally called the “emphasizing particle, or nota augens” (Thurneysen 1946: 252–3, Griffith 2008), and it distinguishes the same categories as the possessive pronouns.
The second pronominal element in Middle Welsh is identical to the stressed simple personal pronouns.
This paper investigates the phenomenon of possessive agreement in Insular Celtic by examining the frequencies of possessive constructions with agreement in selected Old Irish and Middle Welsh texts, and seeking to establish the pragmatic functions of these constructions.
Additionally, by looking at the earliest attestations of constructions with possessive agreement it will be shown that it is unlikely that they should be reconstructed in Proto-Insular Celtic (or even Proto-Celtic).
Rather, it is argued that possessive agreement in Insular Celtic developed as an areal phenomenon which arose in situations of intensive language contact that occurred in Britain and Ireland during the Early Middle Ages (Matasović 2007).

Related Results

Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Abstract Introduction The exact manner in which large language models (LLMs) will be integrated into pathology is not yet fully comprehended. This study examines the accuracy, bene...
Water relations of an insular pit viper
Water relations of an insular pit viper
Colonization of novel habitats often requires plasticity or adaptation to local conditions. There is a critical need to maintain hydration in terrestrial environments having limite...
Mapping Celticity, Mapping Celticization
Mapping Celticity, Mapping Celticization
‘Celticity’ means the quality of being Celtic. ‘Celticization’ means the process or event(s) of becoming Celtic. Thus, Celticity involves a static or synchronic perspective and Cel...
Celtic and Irish Revival
Celtic and Irish Revival
The phrase Celtic Revival describes past movements in literature, the arts, and social practices in which legends, poetry, art, and spirituality of a distinctive kind were revived....
Cross-linguistic Variation of Binding Possibilities and Parameterized DP Hypothesis Revisited
Cross-linguistic Variation of Binding Possibilities and Parameterized DP Hypothesis Revisited
The former study approached the cross-linguistic variation of binding possibilities from the perspective of parameterized DP hypothesis. However, the parameterized DP hypothesis fa...
Agreement with collective nouns: Diachronic corpus studies of American and British English
Agreement with collective nouns: Diachronic corpus studies of American and British English
English collective nouns and their agreement patterns have been extensively studied in corpus linguistics. Previous research has highlighted variability within and across English v...
On the Etymology of the River-name Ruhr and Some of its Central-European Cognates: Celtic or not Celtic – That is the Question
On the Etymology of the River-name Ruhr and Some of its Central-European Cognates: Celtic or not Celtic – That is the Question
Traditionally, the river-nameRuhr and its siblings are said to be derived from the root PIE *reuH - 'tear up, dig up' (outdated form of reconstruction: *reu-, *reu-, *ru - [IEW 868...
Agreement in Kuki-Chin languages of Barak valley
Agreement in Kuki-Chin languages of Barak valley
Abstract This paper discusses the agreement system of five Kuki-Chin (KC) languages of Barak valley, viz. Saihriem, Hrangkhol, Chorei, Sakachep, and Ronglong. The pa...

Back to Top