Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Seismic hazard in Central Italy and the 2016 Amatrice earthquake
View through CrossRef
<p><em>The Amatrice earthquake of August 24th, 2016 (Mw 6.0) struck an area that in the national reference seismic hazard model (MPS04) is characterized by expected horizontal peak ground acceleration (PGA) with 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years higher than 0.25 g. After the occurrence of moderate-to-large magnitude earthquakes with a strong impact on the population, such as the L’Aquila 2009 and Emilia 2012 ones (Mw 6.1 and 5.9, respectively), possible underestimations of the seismic hazard by MPS04 were investigated, in order to analyze and evaluate the possible need for its update. One of the most common misunderstanding is to compare recorded PGA only with PGA with 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years. Moreover, by definition, probabilistic models cannot be validated (or rejected) on the basis of a single event. However, comparisons of forecasted shakings with observed data are useful for understating the consistency of the model. It is then worth highlighting the importance of these comparisons. In fact, MPS04 is the basis for the current Italian building code to provide the effective design procedures and, thus, any modification to the seismic hazard would also affect the building code.</em></p><em>In this paper, comparisons between recorded ground motion during the Amatrice earthquake and seismic hazard estimates are performed, showing that the observed accelerations are consistent with the values expected by the MPS04 model.</em>
Instituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, INGV
Title: Seismic hazard in Central Italy and the 2016 Amatrice earthquake
Description:
<p><em>The Amatrice earthquake of August 24th, 2016 (Mw 6.
0) struck an area that in the national reference seismic hazard model (MPS04) is characterized by expected horizontal peak ground acceleration (PGA) with 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years higher than 0.
25 g.
After the occurrence of moderate-to-large magnitude earthquakes with a strong impact on the population, such as the L’Aquila 2009 and Emilia 2012 ones (Mw 6.
1 and 5.
9, respectively), possible underestimations of the seismic hazard by MPS04 were investigated, in order to analyze and evaluate the possible need for its update.
One of the most common misunderstanding is to compare recorded PGA only with PGA with 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years.
Moreover, by definition, probabilistic models cannot be validated (or rejected) on the basis of a single event.
However, comparisons of forecasted shakings with observed data are useful for understating the consistency of the model.
It is then worth highlighting the importance of these comparisons.
In fact, MPS04 is the basis for the current Italian building code to provide the effective design procedures and, thus, any modification to the seismic hazard would also affect the building code.
</em></p><em>In this paper, comparisons between recorded ground motion during the Amatrice earthquake and seismic hazard estimates are performed, showing that the observed accelerations are consistent with the values expected by the MPS04 model.
</em>.
Related Results
What is the impact of the August 24, 2016 Amatrice earthquake on the seismic hazard assessment in central Italy?
What is the impact of the August 24, 2016 Amatrice earthquake on the seismic hazard assessment in central Italy?
<p>The recent Amatrice strong event (M<sub>w</sub>6.0) occurred on August 24, 2016 in Central Apennines (Italy) in a seismic gap zone, motivated us to study and p...
Analysis of Seismic Cycle Deformation for the Ms7.1 Wushi Earthquake in Xinjiang Based on Geodetic Data
Analysis of Seismic Cycle Deformation for the Ms7.1 Wushi Earthquake in Xinjiang Based on Geodetic Data
On January 23, 2024, an Ms7.1 earthquake struck Wushi County, Aksu Prefecture, Xinjiang. While resulting in relatively limited casualties and economic losses, the event posed a cer...
Instrumental seismicity of the Amatrice earthquake epicentral area: a review
Instrumental seismicity of the Amatrice earthquake epicentral area: a review
<p><em>This study presents a review of the instrumental seismicity of the Norcia-Amatrice area (central Italy) where a still on-going seismic sequence started on August...
Penerapan Sequence Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis dalam Pemodelan Seismogenic Hazard
Penerapan Sequence Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis dalam Pemodelan Seismogenic Hazard
Abstract. Seismogenic areas are areas in the earth's crust that have the potential to produce seismic waves due to tectonic activity. Identification of a seismogenic area measuring...
A record of changes in the Gran Sasso groundwater before, during and after the 2016 Amatrice earthquake, central Italy
A record of changes in the Gran Sasso groundwater before, during and after the 2016 Amatrice earthquake, central Italy
AbstractWe performed continuous recordings (May 2015 – January 2017) of hydraulic pressure and electrical conductivity of groundwater in the 190 m-long horizontal S13 borehole dril...
Earthquake Hydrology and seismic detection capability of deep pressure devices within the Gran Sasso aquifer (central Italy)
Earthquake Hydrology and seismic detection capability of deep pressure devices within the Gran Sasso aquifer (central Italy)
This study investigates the potential of hydroseismograms for seismic monitoring and understanding earthquake physics, utilizing high-frequency pore pressure measurements within th...
Microseismic characterization of Fribourg area (Switzerland) by nanoseismic monitoring
Microseismic characterization of Fribourg area (Switzerland) by nanoseismic monitoring
This thesis aims to investigate the present level of microseismicity generated within the Fribourg area (Switzerland). In particular, it focuses on a 20- 30 km N-S trending seismic...
4D Seismic on Gullfaks
4D Seismic on Gullfaks
SUMMARY
New technologies are rapidly emerging helping to obtain optimal drainage of large reservoirs. 4D seismic is such a reservoir monitoring technique. The phy...

