Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Olearius on Atomism and Theism in Heraclitus: A Presocratic in late 17th century Germany
View through CrossRef
AbstractIn a 1697 monograph, Gottfried Olearius (1672–1715) endeavours to establish Heraclitus as an important new witness for a general thesis upheld by Ralph Cudworth in 1678. According to Cudworth, Greek philosophers earlier than or independent of Leucippus combined a version of atomism with the belief that the world is ruled by God(s). Olearius tries to improve on Cudworth by showing that Heraclitus, who does not figure among Cudworth’s authorities, also upheld both atomism and theism. As to Heraclitean atomism, Olearius starts from a contra diction within the doxographical tradition: According to some authors, the first principle of Nature in Heraclitus is fire, according to others it is exhalation, i.e. air. Olearius suggests that neither “fire” nor “exhalation” can bear their ordinary meaning here, but that Heraclitus uses both terms to hint at very small, swiftly moved, indivisible particles; yet defining such particles as principles of nature must count as atomism. This result is confirmed by a metallurgical simile, apparently used by Heraclitus, which was taken by Aristotle and the doxographical tradition to imply that Heraclitus traced back everything there is to very small and indivisible fire particles prior to the One. The ascription of theism to Heraclitus, in turn, rests on two further texts which report that Heraclitus ascribed the periodical condensation and rarefaction of matter to a
Title: Olearius on Atomism and Theism in Heraclitus: A Presocratic in late 17th century Germany
Description:
AbstractIn a 1697 monograph, Gottfried Olearius (1672–1715) endeavours to establish Heraclitus as an important new witness for a general thesis upheld by Ralph Cudworth in 1678.
According to Cudworth, Greek philosophers earlier than or independent of Leucippus combined a version of atomism with the belief that the world is ruled by God(s).
Olearius tries to improve on Cudworth by showing that Heraclitus, who does not figure among Cudworth’s authorities, also upheld both atomism and theism.
As to Heraclitean atomism, Olearius starts from a contra diction within the doxographical tradition: According to some authors, the first principle of Nature in Heraclitus is fire, according to others it is exhalation, i.
e.
air.
Olearius suggests that neither “fire” nor “exhalation” can bear their ordinary meaning here, but that Heraclitus uses both terms to hint at very small, swiftly moved, indivisible particles; yet defining such particles as principles of nature must count as atomism.
This result is confirmed by a metallurgical simile, apparently used by Heraclitus, which was taken by Aristotle and the doxographical tradition to imply that Heraclitus traced back everything there is to very small and indivisible fire particles prior to the One.
The ascription of theism to Heraclitus, in turn, rests on two further texts which report that Heraclitus ascribed the periodical condensation and rarefaction of matter to a.
Related Results
Presocratic Philosophy
Presocratic Philosophy
The word “Presocratic” was invented in the 19th century ce and does not represent a category recognized in antiquity. The expression “Presocratic philosophy” is misleading: first, ...
Personalistic intention in European theism of the XIX century
Personalistic intention in European theism of the XIX century
The subject of this research is the personalistic intention in European theism of the XIX century in the context of anthropological turn. The article examines such trends of Europe...
Psychological intention in European theism of the XIX century
Psychological intention in European theism of the XIX century
The subject of this research is the psychological intention in the European theism of the XIX century in the context of anthropological turn. The author examines such trends of Eur...
Mark Harris as a Naturalistic Theist: The Perspective of the Model of Levels of Analysis
Mark Harris as a Naturalistic Theist: The Perspective of the Model of Levels of Analysis
Presently, naturalistic theism is the dominant position in the debate on the relation between science and religion, defending a thesis that the conflict between science and religio...
Minimal Theism
Minimal Theism
Abstract
This chapter articulates a simple and flexible way of conceptualizing God—minimal theism—that is useful for the argumentative purposes of the book concernin...
The foundations of presocratic atomism
The foundations of presocratic atomism
Abstract
Why should one believe in the existence of atoms? Nowadays we are inclined to think that only explanatory considerations could justify such a belief; atoms ...
Heraclitus (ca. 500 BCE)
Heraclitus (ca. 500 BCE)
Abstract
Heraclitus was a Presocratic philosopher in Ephesus, a Greek city in Ionia, ruled at the time by Persia. Little is known about his life. He reputedly wrote a tre...
Characterizations of Epicurean Atomism
Characterizations of Epicurean Atomism
AbstractThis chapter relates the history of atomism from Democritus to Lucretius and provides a survey of major opponents of atomism from Aristotle to Cicero, the latter of whom pr...

