Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Archives of Babel A Wikipedia - Workshop
View through CrossRef
In September of 2012, the American novelist Philip Roth published an open letter to Wikipedia in The New Yorker. “I am Philip Roth,” it began, and proceeded to explain how the editors of Wikipedia had gotten the inspiration for his novel The Human Stain wrong. Though the article had in fact only mentioned a theory about his sources, Roth was adamant that it did not belong anywhere in a discussion of his novel. He wanted the idea removed entirely. This, it turns out, was a profound misunderstanding of the editorial practices of Wikipedia, and the theory that Roth would prefer we forget remains in the article to this day.
His letter in The New Yorker, of course, is duly cited. How well should librarians understand the editorial process behind Wikipedia’s articles?
In this workshop, we will take a practical approach to the problem and have a look at what goes on behind the scenes, even edit some pages if we feel so inclined. The workshop will be led by Thomas Basbøll, a philosopher and writing consultant who has spent a few years working as a volunteer editor at Wikipedia and even has even been banned from editing certain pages for a time. The overall goal of the workshop is to demystify one of the most accessed sources of knowledge in the world and help librarians decide how to best help people like Philip Roth, and his readers, make sense of its “authority”.
Thomas Basbøll is the resident writing consultant at the Copenhagen Business School Library. He holds an MA in philosophy from the University of Copenhagen, and a PhD from the Copenhagen Business School. He works closely with students, teachers and researchers in their attempts to master “the craft of research” and is an avid blogger (blog.cbs.dk/inframethodology/).
Universtity of Bergen Library
Title: The Archives of Babel A Wikipedia - Workshop
Description:
In September of 2012, the American novelist Philip Roth published an open letter to Wikipedia in The New Yorker.
“I am Philip Roth,” it began, and proceeded to explain how the editors of Wikipedia had gotten the inspiration for his novel The Human Stain wrong.
Though the article had in fact only mentioned a theory about his sources, Roth was adamant that it did not belong anywhere in a discussion of his novel.
He wanted the idea removed entirely.
This, it turns out, was a profound misunderstanding of the editorial practices of Wikipedia, and the theory that Roth would prefer we forget remains in the article to this day.
His letter in The New Yorker, of course, is duly cited.
How well should librarians understand the editorial process behind Wikipedia’s articles?
In this workshop, we will take a practical approach to the problem and have a look at what goes on behind the scenes, even edit some pages if we feel so inclined.
The workshop will be led by Thomas Basbøll, a philosopher and writing consultant who has spent a few years working as a volunteer editor at Wikipedia and even has even been banned from editing certain pages for a time.
The overall goal of the workshop is to demystify one of the most accessed sources of knowledge in the world and help librarians decide how to best help people like Philip Roth, and his readers, make sense of its “authority”.
Thomas Basbøll is the resident writing consultant at the Copenhagen Business School Library.
He holds an MA in philosophy from the University of Copenhagen, and a PhD from the Copenhagen Business School.
He works closely with students, teachers and researchers in their attempts to master “the craft of research” and is an avid blogger (blog.
cbs.
dk/inframethodology/).
.
Related Results
Wikipedia: a tool to monitor seasonal diseases trends?
Wikipedia: a tool to monitor seasonal diseases trends?
ObjectiveTo explore the interest of Wikipedia as a data source to monitorseasonal diseases trends in metropolitan France.IntroductionToday, Internet, especially Wikipedia, is an im...
Exploiting Wikipedia Semantics for Computing Word Associations
Exploiting Wikipedia Semantics for Computing Word Associations
<p><b>Semantic association computation is the process of automatically quantifying the strength of a semantic connection between two textual units based on various lexi...
Wikipedia in Vascular Surgery Medical Education: Comparative Study (Preprint)
Wikipedia in Vascular Surgery Medical Education: Comparative Study (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
Medical students commonly refer to Wikipedia as their preferred online resource for medical information. The quality and readability of articles ...
COVID-19 research in Wikipedia
COVID-19 research in Wikipedia
Wikipedia is one of the main sources of free knowledge on the Web. During the first few months of the pandemic, over 5,200 new Wikipedia pages on COVID-19 were created, accumulatin...
COVID-19 research in Wikipedia
COVID-19 research in Wikipedia
AbstractWikipedia is one of the main sources of free knowledge on the Web. During the first few months of the pandemic, over 5,200 new Wikipedia pages on COVID-19 have been created...
How to Automate Wikipedia
How to Automate Wikipedia
Nowadays, Wikipedia is so ubiquitous that when you use the Web, you don’t even have to look for it – Wikipedia comes to you. It is well known that Google search is deliberately adj...
USING THE UKRAINIAN WIKIPEDIA IN PUBLIC RELATIONS
USING THE UKRAINIAN WIKIPEDIA IN PUBLIC RELATIONS
The article deals with possibilities of using the electronic encyclopedia Wikipedia, and in particular, the
Ukrainian Wikipedia as a PR tool of commercial organizations.
It analyze...
THE TOWER OF BABEL AND THE WATERSHED OF MORAL CIVILIZATION
THE TOWER OF BABEL AND THE WATERSHED OF MORAL CIVILIZATION
What is the significance of the Tower of Babel narrative in the Bible, seemingly abruptly inserted between Noah and Abraham- The two crucial figures of monotheism? Who led the buil...

