Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Artificial intelligence: protection and defence of human rights (ethical aspect)
View through CrossRef
Taking into account the ethical foundations of the use of artificial intelligence in the field of human rights, the article warns that artificial intelligence has no morals and customs, since morality is usually personal in nature and there is no justification for its repeatability. As a result, artificial intelligence does not have the status of a separate personality, and by using it, the developer or owner is recognised as a participant in civil turnover. Nevertheless, it is assumed that artificial intelligence may replace humans in the future. Therefore, it is necessary that such a replacement is made fairly and compensation is provided if necessary.
It is concluded that the societal challenges posed by artificial intelligence require new approaches to governance, but these challenges do not require new regulatory principles. At the same time, the human rights system we already have is well suited to the global digital environment. With the proliferation of artificial intelligence applications, it is also necessary to improve the practical ways of implementing human rights standards. A new challenge for humanity is to clarify the protection and implementation of human rights in the new world with the active use of artificial intelligence technologies.
It is noted that one of the main ethical issues of artificial intelligence is its potential to perpetuate social stereotypes and discrimination. The use of artificial intelligence technology for facial recognition, recruitment and selection, and machine learning algorithms can lead to serious human rights violations, including the rights to equality, privacy and non-discrimination. In addition, there are concerns about the transparency, accountability and comprehensibility of decisions made by artificial intelligence.
It is warned that it is extremely important to look to the future and take into account the potential ethical and legal implications of the use of artificial intelligence. In the future, it is important to ensure that the development of artificial intelligence is consistent with the implementation of human rights principles. Work should focus on developing an ethical framework for artificial intelligence systems that prioritises transparency, fairness and accountability, while minimising potential negative impacts on human rights.
Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs
Title: Artificial intelligence: protection and defence of human rights (ethical aspect)
Description:
Taking into account the ethical foundations of the use of artificial intelligence in the field of human rights, the article warns that artificial intelligence has no morals and customs, since morality is usually personal in nature and there is no justification for its repeatability.
As a result, artificial intelligence does not have the status of a separate personality, and by using it, the developer or owner is recognised as a participant in civil turnover.
Nevertheless, it is assumed that artificial intelligence may replace humans in the future.
Therefore, it is necessary that such a replacement is made fairly and compensation is provided if necessary.
It is concluded that the societal challenges posed by artificial intelligence require new approaches to governance, but these challenges do not require new regulatory principles.
At the same time, the human rights system we already have is well suited to the global digital environment.
With the proliferation of artificial intelligence applications, it is also necessary to improve the practical ways of implementing human rights standards.
A new challenge for humanity is to clarify the protection and implementation of human rights in the new world with the active use of artificial intelligence technologies.
It is noted that one of the main ethical issues of artificial intelligence is its potential to perpetuate social stereotypes and discrimination.
The use of artificial intelligence technology for facial recognition, recruitment and selection, and machine learning algorithms can lead to serious human rights violations, including the rights to equality, privacy and non-discrimination.
In addition, there are concerns about the transparency, accountability and comprehensibility of decisions made by artificial intelligence.
It is warned that it is extremely important to look to the future and take into account the potential ethical and legal implications of the use of artificial intelligence.
In the future, it is important to ensure that the development of artificial intelligence is consistent with the implementation of human rights principles.
Work should focus on developing an ethical framework for artificial intelligence systems that prioritises transparency, fairness and accountability, while minimising potential negative impacts on human rights.
Related Results
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Social Rights in Refugee Law and Human Rights Law: The Non-discrimination Principle as a Harmonization Tool
Social Rights in Refugee Law and Human Rights Law: The Non-discrimination Principle as a Harmonization Tool
The European “refugee crisis” of today may lead to tomorrow’s integration difficulties. The large-scale influx of refugees has brought and is bringing many who, unless the situatio...
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Photo by Sean Pollock on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
Bioethics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) were born out of similar concerns, such as the reaction to scandal and the restraint ...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
The Artificial
The Artificial
Orvell noted that despite the evolution of society, imitation and authenticity function as “compass points” that guide meaning-making and retain potency as humans continue to negot...
Re Application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland); Reference by Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland Pursuant to Paragraph 33 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (Abortion) (Northern Ireland)
Re Application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland); Reference by Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland Pursuant to Paragraph 33 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (Abortion) (Northern Ireland)
531Human rights — Rights of women in Northern Ireland — Pregnant women and girls — Autonomy and bodily integrity — Right to respect for private and family life — Rights of persons ...
Universality of human rights: theoretical dimension
Universality of human rights: theoretical dimension
The article is sanctified to theoretical research of the concept of the universality of human rights as a process of establishment of corresponding norms and mechanisms of universa...
A Review of the Constitutional Court's Use of International Human Rights Norms
A Review of the Constitutional Court's Use of International Human Rights Norms
Since the World War, international cooperation has been made to preserve the peace and interests of the human community, and representative results include the creation of internat...

