Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparative Efficacy of Intra-Articular PRP vs. Placebo Injections for Pain Management in Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Lower Limbs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
View through CrossRef
Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent degenerative joint disease that causes pain, disability, and a reduced quality of life. Traditional management strategies often provide limited relief, prompting the exploration of alternative therapies such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP). PRP has gained attention for its potential to reduce pain and improve functional outcomes in OA patients. This review aimed to compare the efficacy of intra-articular PRP versus placebo for pain management in OA patients. Methods: This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical outcomes of PRP compared to placebo in OA treatment. A total of 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, involving 1323 patients. The primary outcomes assessed were pain reduction (Visual Analog Scale, VAS), functional improvement (WOMAC and KOOS scores), and quality of life (SF-36). Data were extracted from studies that used different PRP preparation techniques, including leukocyte-rich and leukocyte-poor formulations. Statistical analyses were performed using a random-effects model to calculate the pooled effects including effect sizes (e.g., mean differences or confidence intervals). Results: PRP treatment demonstrated significant improvements in pain relief and functional outcomes. At 3 months, VAS scores showed better reduction in pain for PRP-treated patients compared to placebo. WOMAC scores also favored PRP at 3 months. Quality of life, assessed by SF-36, improved significantly in the PRP group, particularly in physical function (p<0.01). However, while PRP provided significant early improvements, the benefits were less pronounced at 6 months, and some variability was observed depending on PRP preparation and administration protocols. Considering safety profile, PRP has a significant higher incidence of mild side effects. Conclusion: PRP has gained attention for its potential to reduce pain and improve functional outcomes in OA patients. While results suggest PRP is more effective than placebo in the short term, the long-term efficacy remains uncertain due to varying study protocols and follow-up durations.
Title: Comparative Efficacy of Intra-Articular PRP vs. Placebo Injections for Pain Management in Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Lower Limbs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Description:
Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent degenerative joint disease that causes pain, disability, and a reduced quality of life.
Traditional management strategies often provide limited relief, prompting the exploration of alternative therapies such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP).
PRP has gained attention for its potential to reduce pain and improve functional outcomes in OA patients.
This review aimed to compare the efficacy of intra-articular PRP versus placebo for pain management in OA patients.
Methods: This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical outcomes of PRP compared to placebo in OA treatment.
A total of 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, involving 1323 patients.
The primary outcomes assessed were pain reduction (Visual Analog Scale, VAS), functional improvement (WOMAC and KOOS scores), and quality of life (SF-36).
Data were extracted from studies that used different PRP preparation techniques, including leukocyte-rich and leukocyte-poor formulations.
Statistical analyses were performed using a random-effects model to calculate the pooled effects including effect sizes (e.
g.
, mean differences or confidence intervals).
Results: PRP treatment demonstrated significant improvements in pain relief and functional outcomes.
At 3 months, VAS scores showed better reduction in pain for PRP-treated patients compared to placebo.
WOMAC scores also favored PRP at 3 months.
Quality of life, assessed by SF-36, improved significantly in the PRP group, particularly in physical function (p<0.
01).
However, while PRP provided significant early improvements, the benefits were less pronounced at 6 months, and some variability was observed depending on PRP preparation and administration protocols.
Considering safety profile, PRP has a significant higher incidence of mild side effects.
Conclusion: PRP has gained attention for its potential to reduce pain and improve functional outcomes in OA patients.
While results suggest PRP is more effective than placebo in the short term, the long-term efficacy remains uncertain due to varying study protocols and follow-up durations.
.
Related Results
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Abstract
Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex and often overlooked condition caused by the compression of neurovascular structures as they pass through the thoracic outlet. ...
DIAGNOSIS DAN TATALAKSANA KOMPREHENSIF OSTEOARTRITIS
DIAGNOSIS DAN TATALAKSANA KOMPREHENSIF OSTEOARTRITIS
Rheumatic conditions are composed of arthritis and its allied connective tissue diseases. There arecurrently more than 100 discrete forms of arthritis recognized, the most common b...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Osteoarthritis in the Middle-Aged and Elderly in China: Prevalence and Influencing Factors
Osteoarthritis in the Middle-Aged and Elderly in China: Prevalence and Influencing Factors
Background: Osteoarthritis is a common joint disease, with the acceleration of the aging process in China, it has troubled the middle-aged and elderly. There have been some epidemi...
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Given the rarity of chest wall hydatid disease, information on this condition is primarily drawn from case reports. Hence, this study systematically reviews t...
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Presentation and Management of Cervical Thoracic Duct Cyst: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Presentation and Management of Cervical Thoracic Duct Cyst: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Abstract
Introduction
Thoracic duct cysts are an uncommon phenomenon, especially within the cervical region. Due to its limited reported cases, very little is known about its etiol...

