Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Prediction of protein–carbohydrate complex binding affinity using structural features

View through CrossRef
Abstract Protein–carbohydrate interactions play a major role in several cellular and biological processes. Elucidating the factors influencing the binding affinity of protein–carbohydrate complexes and predicting their free energy of binding provide deep insights for understanding the recognition mechanism. In this work, we have collected the experimental binding affinity data for a set of 389 protein–carbohydrate complexes and derived several structure-based features such as contact potentials, interaction energy, number of binding residues and contacts between different types of atoms. Our analysis on the relationship between binding affinity and structural features revealed that the important factors depend on the type of the complex based on number of carbohydrate and protein chains. Specifically, binding site residues, accessible surface area, interactions between various atoms and energy contributions are important to understand the binding affinity. Further, we have developed multiple regression equations for predicting the binding affinity of protein–carbohydrate complexes belonging to six categories of protein–carbohydrate complexes. Our method showed an average correlation and mean absolute error of 0.731 and 1.149 kcal/mol, respectively, between experimental and predicted binding affinities on a jackknife test. We have developed a web server PCA-Pred, Protein–Carbohydrate Affinity Predictor, for predicting the binding affinity of protein–carbohydrate complexes. The web server is freely accessible at https://web.iitm.ac.in/bioinfo2/pcapred/. The web server is implemented using HTML and Python and supports recent versions of major browsers such as Chrome, Firefox, IE10 and Opera.
Title: Prediction of protein–carbohydrate complex binding affinity using structural features
Description:
Abstract Protein–carbohydrate interactions play a major role in several cellular and biological processes.
Elucidating the factors influencing the binding affinity of protein–carbohydrate complexes and predicting their free energy of binding provide deep insights for understanding the recognition mechanism.
In this work, we have collected the experimental binding affinity data for a set of 389 protein–carbohydrate complexes and derived several structure-based features such as contact potentials, interaction energy, number of binding residues and contacts between different types of atoms.
Our analysis on the relationship between binding affinity and structural features revealed that the important factors depend on the type of the complex based on number of carbohydrate and protein chains.
Specifically, binding site residues, accessible surface area, interactions between various atoms and energy contributions are important to understand the binding affinity.
Further, we have developed multiple regression equations for predicting the binding affinity of protein–carbohydrate complexes belonging to six categories of protein–carbohydrate complexes.
Our method showed an average correlation and mean absolute error of 0.
731 and 1.
149 kcal/mol, respectively, between experimental and predicted binding affinities on a jackknife test.
We have developed a web server PCA-Pred, Protein–Carbohydrate Affinity Predictor, for predicting the binding affinity of protein–carbohydrate complexes.
The web server is freely accessible at https://web.
iitm.
ac.
in/bioinfo2/pcapred/.
The web server is implemented using HTML and Python and supports recent versions of major browsers such as Chrome, Firefox, IE10 and Opera.

Related Results

Endothelial Protein C Receptor
Endothelial Protein C Receptor
IntroductionThe protein C anticoagulant pathway plays a critical role in the negative regulation of the blood clotting response. The pathway is triggered by thrombin, which allows ...
Protein–protein binding affinity prediction from amino acid sequence
Protein–protein binding affinity prediction from amino acid sequence
Abstract Motivation: Protein–protein interactions play crucial roles in many biological processes and are responsible for smooth functioning of the machinery in livi...
Form Follows Force: A theoretical framework for Structural Morphology, and Form-Finding research on shell structures
Form Follows Force: A theoretical framework for Structural Morphology, and Form-Finding research on shell structures
The springing up of freeform architecture and structures introduces many challenges to structural engineers. The main challenge is to generate structural forms with high structural...
Expression and characterization of rat kallikrein-binding protein in Escherichia coli
Expression and characterization of rat kallikrein-binding protein in Escherichia coli
Rat kallikrein-binding protein is a novel serine-proteinase inhibitor that forms a covalent complex with tissue kallikrein. We have purified rat kallikrein-binding protein and clon...
Residues Neighboring an SH3-Binding Motif Participate in the Interaction In Vivo
Residues Neighboring an SH3-Binding Motif Participate in the Interaction In Vivo
Abstract In signaling networks, protein-protein interactions are often mediated by modular domains that bind short linear motifs. The motifs’ seq...
A Folding–Docking–Affinity framework for protein–ligand binding affinity prediction
A Folding–Docking–Affinity framework for protein–ligand binding affinity prediction
Abstract Accurate protein-ligand binding affinity prediction is crucial in drug discovery. Existing methods are predominately docking-free, without explicitly consi...
Protein-ligand binding affinity prediction: Is 3D binding pose needed?
Protein-ligand binding affinity prediction: Is 3D binding pose needed?
Abstract Accurate protein-ligand binding affinity prediction is crucial in drug discovery. Existing methods are predominately docking-free, without explicitly considering a...

Back to Top