Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Turkey–Pharmaceuticals: The First WTO Arbitration for Appellate Review

View through CrossRef
On 25 July 2022, the World Trade Organization (WTO) issued an arbitration award under Article 25 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) on the appeal from the Panel Report in Turkey–Pharmaceuticals. This is the first use of the DSU Article 25 arbitration proceedings for the review of a WTO panel decision. As such, the case is highly significant in that it demonstrates how this alternative dispute settlement method can be successfully utilized to fulfil the function of appellate review after the Appellate Body (AB) became paralysed. Moreover, this innovative use of Article 25 arbitration may suggest a long-term solution in the reform of WTO dispute settlement. With respect to substantive legal issues, this case is also noteworthy, for it dealt with the question of public health and WTO law, a particularly sensitive topic in the post-pandemic era. This essay provides a critical review of the findings of the Panel and the Arbitrators on the substantive issues, while appraising the systemic significance of this first appeal arbitration. WTO Dispute Settlement, DSU Article 25 Arbitration, WTO Reform, Appellate Review, GATT Article XX(b), public health, localization measure
Title: Turkey–Pharmaceuticals: The First WTO Arbitration for Appellate Review
Description:
On 25 July 2022, the World Trade Organization (WTO) issued an arbitration award under Article 25 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) on the appeal from the Panel Report in Turkey–Pharmaceuticals.
This is the first use of the DSU Article 25 arbitration proceedings for the review of a WTO panel decision.
As such, the case is highly significant in that it demonstrates how this alternative dispute settlement method can be successfully utilized to fulfil the function of appellate review after the Appellate Body (AB) became paralysed.
Moreover, this innovative use of Article 25 arbitration may suggest a long-term solution in the reform of WTO dispute settlement.
With respect to substantive legal issues, this case is also noteworthy, for it dealt with the question of public health and WTO law, a particularly sensitive topic in the post-pandemic era.
This essay provides a critical review of the findings of the Panel and the Arbitrators on the substantive issues, while appraising the systemic significance of this first appeal arbitration.
WTO Dispute Settlement, DSU Article 25 Arbitration, WTO Reform, Appellate Review, GATT Article XX(b), public health, localization measure.

Related Results

Current Perspectives on Cystic Echinococcosis: A Systematic Review
Current Perspectives on Cystic Echinococcosis: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: Hydatidosis, a zoonotic disease caused by the larval stage of Echinococcus granulosus, is a significant public health concern with notable economic impact. I...
Blockage of the WTO Appellate Body and Multi-party Interim Appeal arbitration arrangement (MPIA)
Blockage of the WTO Appellate Body and Multi-party Interim Appeal arbitration arrangement (MPIA)
The World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute settlement system is organized in two stages. In the first instance, the existing dispute between the members is resolved by ad hoc panel...
WTO Case Law in 2013
WTO Case Law in 2013
This is an analytical survey of the WTO case law for 2013. This survey is carried out within the framework of the PhD program in International Law and Economics of the PhD school o...
International Investment Arbitration
International Investment Arbitration
International investment arbitration is heterogeneous. At its core, it represents the settlement of international investment disputes between foreign investors and host States by a...

Back to Top