Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Nasal negative pressure oscillatory therapy versus oscillatory positive expiratory pressure for airway clearance in patients with acute exacerbations of bronchiectasis (NNPO-BE): a multicentre, randomised, crossover non-inferiority trial protocol

View through CrossRef
Background Airway clearance techniques (ACTs) are a cornerstone of bronchiectasis management, particularly during acute exacerbations characterized by mucus retention and impaired mucociliary clearance. However, conventional ACTs are frequently limited by patient tolerance, reliance on skilled personnel and variable adherence in real-world settings. Nasal negative pressure oscillatory airway clearance represents a novel, non-invasive strategy designed to enhance expiratory flow bias and promote mobilization of airway secretions. Objectives To assess whether nasal negative pressure oscillatory (NNPO) airway clearance is non-inferior to standard airway clearance therapy, with oscillatory positive expiratory pressure (OPEP) used as the conventional comparator, in hospitalized patients with acute exacerbations of bronchiectasis. Methods This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized crossover trial conducted across four tertiary hospitals in China. Eligible participants will receive NNPO and OPEP therapy in random order over four consecutive days. The primary outcome is sputum wet weight collected during and within 30 min after each treatment session. Secondary outcomes include lung function, peripheral oxygen saturation, patient-reported efficacy and comfort, and adverse events. Conclusion This trial will evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of nasal negative pressure oscillatory airway clearance compared with conventional airway clearance therapy in hospitalized patients with acute exacerbations of bronchiectasis, providing evidence to inform clinical decision-making in acute management. Systematic review registration ChiCTR2500105694 PID: 266607, https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid=266607 .
Title: Nasal negative pressure oscillatory therapy versus oscillatory positive expiratory pressure for airway clearance in patients with acute exacerbations of bronchiectasis (NNPO-BE): a multicentre, randomised, crossover non-inferiority trial protocol
Description:
Background Airway clearance techniques (ACTs) are a cornerstone of bronchiectasis management, particularly during acute exacerbations characterized by mucus retention and impaired mucociliary clearance.
However, conventional ACTs are frequently limited by patient tolerance, reliance on skilled personnel and variable adherence in real-world settings.
Nasal negative pressure oscillatory airway clearance represents a novel, non-invasive strategy designed to enhance expiratory flow bias and promote mobilization of airway secretions.
Objectives To assess whether nasal negative pressure oscillatory (NNPO) airway clearance is non-inferior to standard airway clearance therapy, with oscillatory positive expiratory pressure (OPEP) used as the conventional comparator, in hospitalized patients with acute exacerbations of bronchiectasis.
Methods This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized crossover trial conducted across four tertiary hospitals in China.
Eligible participants will receive NNPO and OPEP therapy in random order over four consecutive days.
The primary outcome is sputum wet weight collected during and within 30 min after each treatment session.
Secondary outcomes include lung function, peripheral oxygen saturation, patient-reported efficacy and comfort, and adverse events.
Conclusion This trial will evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of nasal negative pressure oscillatory airway clearance compared with conventional airway clearance therapy in hospitalized patients with acute exacerbations of bronchiectasis, providing evidence to inform clinical decision-making in acute management.
Systematic review registration ChiCTR2500105694 PID: 266607, https://www.
chictr.
org.
cn/bin/project/edit?pid=266607 .

Related Results

International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Crossover Phenomena in Motor Evoked Potentials During Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring of Cranial Surgeries
Crossover Phenomena in Motor Evoked Potentials During Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring of Cranial Surgeries
Purpose: Transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) are used to assess the corticospinal tract during surgery. Transcranial motor evoked potentials are elicited by p...
Elevated Eosinophil Counts in Acute Exacerbations of Bronchiectasis: Unveiling a Distinct Clinical Phenotype
Elevated Eosinophil Counts in Acute Exacerbations of Bronchiectasis: Unveiling a Distinct Clinical Phenotype
Abstract Background Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis is a chronic respiratory disease characterized by bronchial dilation. However, the significan...
Predictors of False-Negative Axillary FNA Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Predictors of False-Negative Axillary FNA Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract Introduction Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is commonly used to investigate lymphadenopathy of suspected metastatic origin. The current study aims to find the association be...
2004 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with and without bronchiectasis in Aboriginal Australians: a comparative study
2004 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with and without bronchiectasis in Aboriginal Australians: a comparative study
AbstractBackgroundChronic respiratory disorders are highly prevalent in Aboriginal Australian population, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and bronchiectasis....
Physiological responses to positive expiratory pressure breathing a comparison of the PEP bottle and the PEP mask.
Physiological responses to positive expiratory pressure breathing a comparison of the PEP bottle and the PEP mask.
BACKGROUND: In the intensive care unit we have observed that patients have different adherence to 2 commonly used positive-expiratory-pressure (PEP) therapy devices: the PEP bottle...

Back to Top