Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Algol Genes

View through CrossRef
In 1969 a “Report on the Algorithmic Language ALGOL 68” was published in the journal Numerische Mathematik. The authors of the report were also its designers, all academic computer scientists, Adriaan van Wijngaarden and C. H. A. Koster from the Netherlands and Barry Mailloux and John Peck from Canada. The Algol 68 project was, by then, 4 years old. The International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) had under its umbrella a number of technical committees devoted to various specialties; each technical committee in turn had, under its jurisdiction, several working groups given to subspecialties. One such committee was the technical committee TC2, on programming; and in 1965 one of its constituent working groups WG2.1 (programming languages) mandated the development of a new international language as a successor to Algol 60. The latter, developed by an international committee of computer scientists between 1958 and 1963, had had considerable theoretical and practical impact in the first age of computer science. The Dutch mathematician-turned-computer scientist Adriaan van Wijngaarden, one of the codesigners of Algol 60 was entrusted with heading this task. The goal for Algol 68 was that it was to be a successor of Algol 60 and that it would have to be accepted and approved by IFIP as the “official” international programming language. Prior to its publication in 1969, the language went through a thorough process of review, first within the ranks of WG2.1, then by its umbrella body TC2, and finally by the IFIP General Assembly before being officially recommended for publication. The words review and recommendation mask the fact that the Algol 68 project manifested some of the features of the legislative process with its attendant politics. Thus, at a meeting of WG2.1 in Munich in December 1968— described by one of the Algol 68 codesigners John Peck as “dramatic”— where the Algol 68 report was to be approved by the working group, the designers presented their language proposal much as a lawmaker presents a bill to a legislative body; and just as the latter debates over the bill, oftentimes acrimoniously, before putting the bill to a vote, so also the Algol 68 proposal was debated over by members of WG2.1 and was finally voted on.
Title: Algol Genes
Description:
In 1969 a “Report on the Algorithmic Language ALGOL 68” was published in the journal Numerische Mathematik.
The authors of the report were also its designers, all academic computer scientists, Adriaan van Wijngaarden and C.
H.
A.
Koster from the Netherlands and Barry Mailloux and John Peck from Canada.
The Algol 68 project was, by then, 4 years old.
The International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) had under its umbrella a number of technical committees devoted to various specialties; each technical committee in turn had, under its jurisdiction, several working groups given to subspecialties.
One such committee was the technical committee TC2, on programming; and in 1965 one of its constituent working groups WG2.
1 (programming languages) mandated the development of a new international language as a successor to Algol 60.
The latter, developed by an international committee of computer scientists between 1958 and 1963, had had considerable theoretical and practical impact in the first age of computer science.
The Dutch mathematician-turned-computer scientist Adriaan van Wijngaarden, one of the codesigners of Algol 60 was entrusted with heading this task.
The goal for Algol 68 was that it was to be a successor of Algol 60 and that it would have to be accepted and approved by IFIP as the “official” international programming language.
Prior to its publication in 1969, the language went through a thorough process of review, first within the ranks of WG2.
1, then by its umbrella body TC2, and finally by the IFIP General Assembly before being officially recommended for publication.
The words review and recommendation mask the fact that the Algol 68 project manifested some of the features of the legislative process with its attendant politics.
Thus, at a meeting of WG2.
1 in Munich in December 1968— described by one of the Algol 68 codesigners John Peck as “dramatic”— where the Algol 68 report was to be approved by the working group, the designers presented their language proposal much as a lawmaker presents a bill to a legislative body; and just as the latter debates over the bill, oftentimes acrimoniously, before putting the bill to a vote, so also the Algol 68 proposal was debated over by members of WG2.
1 and was finally voted on.

Related Results

Algol anomaly or careful observations of its brightness? The values recorded for the magnitude of Algol in the medieval astronomical corpus
Algol anomaly or careful observations of its brightness? The values recorded for the magnitude of Algol in the medieval astronomical corpus
The historical evidence from the past two millennia show two problems concerning the star Algol (β Per): First, a critical variation in its brightness from a magnitude m ~ 2 in (1)...
Molecular Analyses of Deletion of the Long Arm of Chromosome 20 in Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Molecular Analyses of Deletion of the Long Arm of Chromosome 20 in Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Abstract Abstract 3834 Del(20q), one of the common chromosome abnormalities in myeloid neoplasms, is observed in 5 to 10% of patients with myelodyspla...
Identification of Differential Methylation Regions and Correspondence Targeted Genes in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Identification of Differential Methylation Regions and Correspondence Targeted Genes in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Abstract Background The differential methylation included hypermethylation and hypomethylation plays significant role in the progression of many kind of cancers but study ...
Microrna Regulation of Nodule Zone-Specific Gene Expression In Soybean
Microrna Regulation of Nodule Zone-Specific Gene Expression In Soybean
Nitrogen is a paramount important essential element for all living organisms. It has been found to bea crucial structural component of proteins, nucleic acids, enzymes and other ce...
Genome-wide characterization and expression analyses of the MYB superfamily genes during developmental stages in Chinese jujube
Genome-wide characterization and expression analyses of the MYB superfamily genes during developmental stages in Chinese jujube
The MYB transcription factor (TF) superfamily, one of the largest gene superfamilies, regulates a variety of physiological processes in plants. Although many MYB superfamily genes ...
XA4C: eXplainable representation learning via Autoencoders revealing Critical genes
XA4C: eXplainable representation learning via Autoencoders revealing Critical genes
ABSTRACT Machine Learning models have been frequently used in transcriptome analyses. Particularly, Representation Learning (RL), e.g., autoencod...
Exploring the Diagnosis of Immune-Related Genes in Metabolic Syndrome Based on Three Algorithms
Exploring the Diagnosis of Immune-Related Genes in Metabolic Syndrome Based on Three Algorithms
Abstract Background The pathogenesis of Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) remains largely unexplored. This study aims to explore the immune-related genes in MetS. Methods The mic...
Abstract 3350: TSEEN genes database
Abstract 3350: TSEEN genes database
Abstract According to the hypothesis of the evolutionary role of tumors, evolutionarily new genes should be specifically expressed in tumors [A.P. Kozlov, 2014]. Ind...

Back to Top