Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Peptide YY Induces Intestinal Proliferation in Peptide YY Knockout Mice With Total Enteral Nutrition After Massive Small Bowel Resection

View through CrossRef
ABSTRACTObjective:In previous research, peptide YY (PYY) administered in supraphysiological doses did not induce significant proliferative effects in rats that were allowed to feed ad libitum after massive small bowel resection (SBR). The main reason may well have been the interference of endogenous PYY released from L cells in the distal bowel in response to the presence of augmented unabsorbed intraluminal nutrients. The purpose of the present study was to explore the effect of PYY on intestinal proliferation with total enteral nutrition (TEN) in a SBR model of PYY knockout (Pyy−/−) mice, which do not produce endogenous PYY.Materials and Methods:Pyy−/− mice were assigned into 3 experimental groups: sham mice (sham group) underwent bowel transection and reanastomosis, and received TEN; SBR mice (SBR group) underwent a 50% small bowel resection, and received TEN; and SBR‐PYY mice (SBR‐PYY group) underwent a 50% small bowel resection, received TEN, and were treated with PYY1–36 subcutaneously from day 2 postoperatively. Parameters of enterocyte proliferation and apoptosis were determined on day 8 following operation.Results:SBR‐PYY mice demonstrated a significant increase in (vs SBR) bowel and mucosal weights, mucosal DNA and protein, villus height, and crypt depth in jejunum and ileum. SBR‐PYY mice also showed an increased crypt cell proliferation index in jejunum and ileum and decreased villus cell apoptotic index in ileum compared with SBR animals.Conclusions:In an SBR model of Pyy−/− mice, PYY induces proliferation of residual intestine with TEN.
Title: Peptide YY Induces Intestinal Proliferation in Peptide YY Knockout Mice With Total Enteral Nutrition After Massive Small Bowel Resection
Description:
ABSTRACTObjective:In previous research, peptide YY (PYY) administered in supraphysiological doses did not induce significant proliferative effects in rats that were allowed to feed ad libitum after massive small bowel resection (SBR).
The main reason may well have been the interference of endogenous PYY released from L cells in the distal bowel in response to the presence of augmented unabsorbed intraluminal nutrients.
The purpose of the present study was to explore the effect of PYY on intestinal proliferation with total enteral nutrition (TEN) in a SBR model of PYY knockout (Pyy−/−) mice, which do not produce endogenous PYY.
Materials and Methods:Pyy−/− mice were assigned into 3 experimental groups: sham mice (sham group) underwent bowel transection and reanastomosis, and received TEN; SBR mice (SBR group) underwent a 50% small bowel resection, and received TEN; and SBR‐PYY mice (SBR‐PYY group) underwent a 50% small bowel resection, received TEN, and were treated with PYY1–36 subcutaneously from day 2 postoperatively.
Parameters of enterocyte proliferation and apoptosis were determined on day 8 following operation.
Results:SBR‐PYY mice demonstrated a significant increase in (vs SBR) bowel and mucosal weights, mucosal DNA and protein, villus height, and crypt depth in jejunum and ileum.
SBR‐PYY mice also showed an increased crypt cell proliferation index in jejunum and ileum and decreased villus cell apoptotic index in ileum compared with SBR animals.
Conclusions:In an SBR model of Pyy−/− mice, PYY induces proliferation of residual intestine with TEN.

Related Results

FORMULASI FORMULA ENTERAL BLENDERIZED NON MILK BASED
FORMULASI FORMULA ENTERAL BLENDERIZED NON MILK BASED
ABSTRACTBackground: Hospital enteral formula with lactose-free content is still rare, meanwhile lactose-free enteral food is needed, especially with patients who have lactose intol...
Grains or Veins: Is Enteral Nutrition Really Better Than Parenteral Nutrition? A Look at the Evidence
Grains or Veins: Is Enteral Nutrition Really Better Than Parenteral Nutrition? A Look at the Evidence
Background: Enteral nutrition is said to be better than parenteral nutrition for providing nutrition support to humans. Purpose: To assess the literature documenting the assertions...
Nutritional Support after Open Liver Resection: A Systematic Review
Nutritional Support after Open Liver Resection: A Systematic Review
<i>Background:</i> Perioperative nutrition in patients with limited liver function after partial hepatic resection is still controversial. In particular, the significan...
Risk factor analysis of enterocutaneous fistula after small bowel surgery
Risk factor analysis of enterocutaneous fistula after small bowel surgery
Abstract: Background: ECF most frequently follows a complication of abdominal surgery, although a smaller number occur spontaneously in association with conditia Background: Entero...
Parenteral Versus Enteral Nutrition on Perioperative Cognitive Function in Anesthesia Patients
Parenteral Versus Enteral Nutrition on Perioperative Cognitive Function in Anesthesia Patients
This study evaluated the impact of enteral nutrition versus parenteral nutrition on perioperative cognitive function and related outcomes in patients undergoing different surgeries...
Association between delivery methods for enteral nutrition and physical status among older adults
Association between delivery methods for enteral nutrition and physical status among older adults
Abstract Background The physical status of patients who received enteral nutrition is still unclear. We aimed to compare the physical functional status among older adult patients w...
Atypical Sigmoid Volvulus in an Adolescent: A Case Report and Literature Review
Atypical Sigmoid Volvulus in an Adolescent: A Case Report and Literature Review
Abstract Introduction Sigmoid volvulus is an underrecognized diagnosis with potentially fatal outcomes in adolescents; the current study aims to present an adolescent with mild sym...

Back to Top