Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Rate of Endothelial Cell Loss and Graft Survival in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Eyes Requiring a Rebubble

View through CrossRef
Purpose: We aimed to compare the rate of 6-month endothelial cell loss (ECL) and 6-month graft survival in eyes that did not require a postoperative rebubble with eyes that did require a postoperative rebubble after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) surgery. Methods: A consecutive series of DMEK surgeries performed from September 2013 to March 2020 was retrospectively analyzed. Eyes that did not require a rebubble for graft detachment were compared with eyes with 1 rebubble and eyes with 2 or more rebubbles for 6-month ECL and graft survival. A subanalysis of the rebubble rate for different indications for transplantation was also performed. Results: One thousand two hundred ninety-eight eyes were included in this study. The 6-month ECL for eyes with no rebubbles, 1 rebubble, and ≥2 rebubbles was 29.3% ± 16.2% (n = 793), 36.4% ± 18.6% (n = 97, P = 0.001), and 50.1% ± 19.6% (n = 28, P < 0.001), respectively. The 6-month graft survival rate for eyes with no rebubbles, 1 rebubble, and ≥2 rebubbles was 99.5%, 97.8% (P = 0.035), and 81.8% (P < 0.001), respectively. When compared to the rebubble rate for DMEK for Fuchs dystrophy (156/1165 eyes = 13.4%), the rebubble rates were statistically higher for DMEK for failed penetrating keratoplasty (28.5%, P = 0.021) and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (28.0%, P = 0.036). Conclusions: Eyes undergoing any rebubble procedure in the postoperative period after DMEK have an increased risk of endothelial cell loss and graft failure at 6 months postoperative. DMEK in eyes for failed penetrating keratoplasty and failed DMEK had the highest rebubble rate, with the former reaching statistical significance.
Title: Rate of Endothelial Cell Loss and Graft Survival in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Eyes Requiring a Rebubble
Description:
Purpose: We aimed to compare the rate of 6-month endothelial cell loss (ECL) and 6-month graft survival in eyes that did not require a postoperative rebubble with eyes that did require a postoperative rebubble after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) surgery.
Methods: A consecutive series of DMEK surgeries performed from September 2013 to March 2020 was retrospectively analyzed.
Eyes that did not require a rebubble for graft detachment were compared with eyes with 1 rebubble and eyes with 2 or more rebubbles for 6-month ECL and graft survival.
A subanalysis of the rebubble rate for different indications for transplantation was also performed.
Results: One thousand two hundred ninety-eight eyes were included in this study.
The 6-month ECL for eyes with no rebubbles, 1 rebubble, and ≥2 rebubbles was 29.
3% ± 16.
2% (n = 793), 36.
4% ± 18.
6% (n = 97, P = 0.
001), and 50.
1% ± 19.
6% (n = 28, P < 0.
001), respectively.
The 6-month graft survival rate for eyes with no rebubbles, 1 rebubble, and ≥2 rebubbles was 99.
5%, 97.
8% (P = 0.
035), and 81.
8% (P < 0.
001), respectively.
When compared to the rebubble rate for DMEK for Fuchs dystrophy (156/1165 eyes = 13.
4%), the rebubble rates were statistically higher for DMEK for failed penetrating keratoplasty (28.
5%, P = 0.
021) and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (28.
0%, P = 0.
036).
Conclusions: Eyes undergoing any rebubble procedure in the postoperative period after DMEK have an increased risk of endothelial cell loss and graft failure at 6 months postoperative.
DMEK in eyes for failed penetrating keratoplasty and failed DMEK had the highest rebubble rate, with the former reaching statistical significance.

Related Results

Donor DMEK Tissue Characteristics: Association With Rebubble Rate and 6-Month Endothelial Cell Loss
Donor DMEK Tissue Characteristics: Association With Rebubble Rate and 6-Month Endothelial Cell Loss
Purpose: To determine whether specific donor characteristics influence postoperative rebubble rate and 6-month endothelial cell loss (ECL) in Descemet membrane endothel...
History of the development of selective keratoplasty and its possibilities
History of the development of selective keratoplasty and its possibilities
Relevance In 1914, A. Elschnig successfully performed penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) with an allograft, which is now recognized as a standard treatment for corneal opacity along w...
Descemet Membrane Endothelial Transfer: Ultimate Outcome
Descemet Membrane Endothelial Transfer: Ultimate Outcome
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical outcome of 16 eyes undergoing Descemet membrane endothelial transfer (DMET). Methods: In...
Outcomes of Pre-Descemet Endothelial Keratoplasty for Failed Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty
Outcomes of Pre-Descemet Endothelial Keratoplasty for Failed Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty
Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of pre-Descemet endothelial keratoplasty (PDEK) for failed therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty. ...
Modern techniques and features of selective keratoplasty
Modern techniques and features of selective keratoplasty
Selective keratoplasty involves replacing the affected layers of the cornea with similar donor tissue. In case of pathological changes in the middle and posterior stroma, deep ante...

Back to Top