Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Framework Development for Disaster Risk Dynamics and Resilience Analytics in Complex Socio-Technical Systems
View through CrossRef
<p>In most cases, disasters are assessed at an event-level, for example, by focusing on quantitative surveys of casualties, physical damages, and qualitative root-cause analyses of individual events. The disaster risks are evaluated based on expected utility loss by calculating the probability of occurrence and potential consequences. However, we should know that disaster causes are increasingly sophisticated and usually entangle quickly with deep social and organizational problems, and their impacts are prolonged with a further complication in the nexus of societal systems. To reduce disaster risk, we propose to consider disasters as inseparable parts of the societal operation and critical resource and service circulation, deviating from the well-established concept that a disaster is simply the tragic outcome of human casualties and property damages. Therefore, we will develop a novel DR3 analysis framework to address the dynamic change patterns of risks, i.e., &#8220;risk dynamics,&#8221; as a key concept for analyzing risk in complex socio-technical systems. In this proposition, DR3 analysis should consider all components of the socio-technical systems that are susceptible to disaster-induced functional perturbations and the DR3 assessment is associated with the overall state change of the socio-technical systems and their performance controllability of the organizations. The failures of the physical systems and individual human factors in the organizations are critical for comprehensive risk analysis. To achieve the goal, we establish a multidisciplinary team to address DR3 vital issues by using the participatory system dynamics modeling approach in this project. Consortium partners will focus on unique disaster cases and test the underlying hypotheses from multiple perspectives. Stakeholders from government agencies and infrastructure service providers will be engaged through continuous and direct involvement in dialogues and activities, supporting the development of risk-dynamics based DR3 solutions.</p>
Title: Framework Development for Disaster Risk Dynamics and Resilience Analytics in Complex Socio-Technical Systems
Description:
<p>In most cases, disasters are assessed at an event-level, for example, by focusing on quantitative surveys of casualties, physical damages, and qualitative root-cause analyses of individual events.
The disaster risks are evaluated based on expected utility loss by calculating the probability of occurrence and potential consequences.
However, we should know that disaster causes are increasingly sophisticated and usually entangle quickly with deep social and organizational problems, and their impacts are prolonged with a further complication in the nexus of societal systems.
To reduce disaster risk, we propose to consider disasters as inseparable parts of the societal operation and critical resource and service circulation, deviating from the well-established concept that a disaster is simply the tragic outcome of human casualties and property damages.
Therefore, we will develop a novel DR3 analysis framework to address the dynamic change patterns of risks, i.
e.
, &#8220;risk dynamics,&#8221; as a key concept for analyzing risk in complex socio-technical systems.
In this proposition, DR3 analysis should consider all components of the socio-technical systems that are susceptible to disaster-induced functional perturbations and the DR3 assessment is associated with the overall state change of the socio-technical systems and their performance controllability of the organizations.
The failures of the physical systems and individual human factors in the organizations are critical for comprehensive risk analysis.
To achieve the goal, we establish a multidisciplinary team to address DR3 vital issues by using the participatory system dynamics modeling approach in this project.
Consortium partners will focus on unique disaster cases and test the underlying hypotheses from multiple perspectives.
Stakeholders from government agencies and infrastructure service providers will be engaged through continuous and direct involvement in dialogues and activities, supporting the development of risk-dynamics based DR3 solutions.
</p>.
Related Results
Flood resilience measurement for communities: data for science and practice
Flood resilience measurement for communities: data for science and practice
<p>Given the increased attention put on strengthening disaster resilience, there is a growing need to invest in its measurement and the overall accountability of resi...
GEOINFORMATION FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT 2020 (GI4DM2020): PREFACE
GEOINFORMATION FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT 2020 (GI4DM2020): PREFACE
Abstract. Across the world, nature-triggered disasters fuelled by climate change are worsening. Some two billion people have been affected by the consequences of natural hazards ov...
Disaster Anthropology
Disaster Anthropology
Disaster Anthropology uses theoretical and methodological tools from across anthropological subfields to understand the effects of disasters. Anthropologists based in academia and ...
The concept of resilience- the scientific adaptation for society health
The concept of resilience- the scientific adaptation for society health
The main idea of the paper to indicate the factors of resilience indicators. The task of the research - a theoretical analysis of the latest research resilience factors and resilie...
People Analytics
People Analytics
People analytics refers to the systematic and scientific process of applying quantitative or qualitative data analysis methods to derive insights that shape and inform employee-rel...
Natural Hazards Governance in Zambia
Natural Hazards Governance in Zambia
Zambia, like many other developing nations, is grappling with the challenges of development in the context of climate change. The development–climate change–disaster nexus has emer...
MITIGATION OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION IN PANGANDARAN REGENCY
MITIGATION OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION IN PANGANDARAN REGENCY
The government has a function to protect its people, including managing the disaster. The function of government in natural disaster management is a function that is expected to be...
The roles and potential of resilience-based management for sustainable decision-making in geoengineering
The roles and potential of resilience-based management for sustainable decision-making in geoengineering
In its most general conceptualization, resilience refers to a natural, social, or engineered system’s capacity to absorb shocks, adapt, and recover. Resilience has gained...

