Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PHENYLEPHRINE, MEPHENTERMINE AND NOREPINEPHRINE IN THE TREATMENT OF HYPOTENSION DURING SPINAL ANAESTHESIA FOR CAESAREAN SECTION
View through CrossRef
Background: Post-spinal hypotension is a common complication during caesarean sections under
spinal anaesthesia, necessitating effective management protocols. Previous studies have explored
various vasopressors, such as norepinephrine, phenylephrine, and mephentermine, to control this condition, but comparative
effectiveness and safety remain under investigation. Objective: This study aims to compare the efcacy and safety of
mephentermine, phenylephrine, and norepinephrine in managing hypotension during spinal anesthesia for caesarean
sections. Method: A total of 114 patients undergoing elective caesarean sections were randomly assigned to three groups,
Group P (phenylephrine 100 mcg IV), Group M (mephentermine 6 mg IV), and Group N (norepinephrine 6 mcg IV). Blood
pressure, heart rate, and neonatal outcomes (APGAR scores) were monitored and recorded at various intervals. Each group
consisted of 38 patients. The primary outcome was the maintenance of mean arterial blood pressure, while secondary
outcomes included heart rate, number of bolus doses required, and APGAR scores of the newborns. Data were analyzed using
the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0. Observations were described in terms of proportions, and
statistical analysis was performed using chi-square tests and Student's t-tests where applicable. A p-value of less than 0.05 was
considered statistically signicant. Age group distribution, mean age, and mean weight among the groups were compared
using chi-square and ANOVA tests, respectively, with detailed results indicating no signicant differences across groups in
these parameters. Results: The norepinephrine group exhibited quicker blood pressure control compared to the other groups.
The mean blood pressure was higher in the norepinephrine group, with signicant differences observed in diastolic and
systolic blood pressure across the study period. The phenylephrine group reported higher rates of bradycardia, while the
mephentermine group showed higher incidences of tachycardia. APGAR scores were statistically similar across all groups,
indicating no signicant difference in neonatal outcomes. Conclusion: Norepinephrine demonstrated superior efcacy in
blood pressure management with fewer incidences of bradycardia and comparable neonatal outcomes, making it a
preferable choice over phenylephrine and mephentermine for treating post-spinal hypotension during caesarean sections.
Title: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PHENYLEPHRINE, MEPHENTERMINE AND NOREPINEPHRINE IN THE TREATMENT OF HYPOTENSION DURING SPINAL ANAESTHESIA FOR CAESAREAN SECTION
Description:
Background: Post-spinal hypotension is a common complication during caesarean sections under
spinal anaesthesia, necessitating effective management protocols.
Previous studies have explored
various vasopressors, such as norepinephrine, phenylephrine, and mephentermine, to control this condition, but comparative
effectiveness and safety remain under investigation.
Objective: This study aims to compare the efcacy and safety of
mephentermine, phenylephrine, and norepinephrine in managing hypotension during spinal anesthesia for caesarean
sections.
Method: A total of 114 patients undergoing elective caesarean sections were randomly assigned to three groups,
Group P (phenylephrine 100 mcg IV), Group M (mephentermine 6 mg IV), and Group N (norepinephrine 6 mcg IV).
Blood
pressure, heart rate, and neonatal outcomes (APGAR scores) were monitored and recorded at various intervals.
Each group
consisted of 38 patients.
The primary outcome was the maintenance of mean arterial blood pressure, while secondary
outcomes included heart rate, number of bolus doses required, and APGAR scores of the newborns.
Data were analyzed using
the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.
Observations were described in terms of proportions, and
statistical analysis was performed using chi-square tests and Student's t-tests where applicable.
A p-value of less than 0.
05 was
considered statistically signicant.
Age group distribution, mean age, and mean weight among the groups were compared
using chi-square and ANOVA tests, respectively, with detailed results indicating no signicant differences across groups in
these parameters.
Results: The norepinephrine group exhibited quicker blood pressure control compared to the other groups.
The mean blood pressure was higher in the norepinephrine group, with signicant differences observed in diastolic and
systolic blood pressure across the study period.
The phenylephrine group reported higher rates of bradycardia, while the
mephentermine group showed higher incidences of tachycardia.
APGAR scores were statistically similar across all groups,
indicating no signicant difference in neonatal outcomes.
Conclusion: Norepinephrine demonstrated superior efcacy in
blood pressure management with fewer incidences of bradycardia and comparable neonatal outcomes, making it a
preferable choice over phenylephrine and mephentermine for treating post-spinal hypotension during caesarean sections.
Related Results
Prophylactic bolus dose of Nor-Epinephrine versus Phenylephrine bolus for Management of post- spinal Hypotension among patients undergoing Elective Caesarean Section. A Prospective Cohort Study
Prophylactic bolus dose of Nor-Epinephrine versus Phenylephrine bolus for Management of post- spinal Hypotension among patients undergoing Elective Caesarean Section. A Prospective Cohort Study
Background: Cesarean section (CS) is the preferable procedure to preserve life when spontaneous vaginal delivery poses a risk to the mother and child. Since spinal anesthesia for C...
The effect of two dose phenylephrin for preventing hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery
The effect of two dose phenylephrin for preventing hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery
Background: Spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension is one of the most complications which can cause many severe maternal and fetal complications. Therefore, the prevention and treat...
A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN PROPHYLACTIC PHENYLEPHRINE INFUSION & COLLOID CO-HYDRATION FOR PREVENTION OF HYPOTENSION FOLLOWING SPINAL ANESTHESIA FOR CAESAREAN SECTION.
A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN PROPHYLACTIC PHENYLEPHRINE INFUSION & COLLOID CO-HYDRATION FOR PREVENTION OF HYPOTENSION FOLLOWING SPINAL ANESTHESIA FOR CAESAREAN SECTION.
Background: Spinal anesthesia for caesarean section may cause maternal hypotension that can have deleterious effects on uterine blood flow, fetal well-being and neonatal outcome as...
Effectiveness of Prophylactic Bolus Phenylephrine on the Prevention of Postspinal Hypotension During Elective Cesarean Section at Gandhi Memorial Hospital, Ethiopia 2024, Observational Prospective Cohort Study
Effectiveness of Prophylactic Bolus Phenylephrine on the Prevention of Postspinal Hypotension During Elective Cesarean Section at Gandhi Memorial Hospital, Ethiopia 2024, Observational Prospective Cohort Study
Abstract
Introduction: Spinal anesthesia owing to the perceived advantages is commonly used for caesarean section. However parturient under spinal anesthesia frequently exp...
Prophylactic norepinephrine infusion or leg wrapping for postspinal hypotension in elective caesarean delivery
Prophylactic norepinephrine infusion or leg wrapping for postspinal hypotension in elective caesarean delivery
BACKGROUND
Because of its alpha and beta agonist properties, norepinephrine infusion is currently being studied for the prevention of spinal hypotension during caesarea...
Hypotension after unilateral versus bilateral spinal anaesthesia
Hypotension after unilateral versus bilateral spinal anaesthesia
BACKGROUND
Spinal anaesthesia is frequently used in surgical procedures involving the lower abdomen and extremities, however, the occurrence of hypotension remains a co...
A comparative study of Lichtenstein hernioplasty performed under spinal anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia in treatment of unilateral inguinal hernia
A comparative study of Lichtenstein hernioplasty performed under spinal anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia in treatment of unilateral inguinal hernia
Background: Lichtenstein mesh repair technique is widely used throughout the world in inguinal hernia repair. Hernioplasty done under local anaesthesia certainly has some benefits ...
A study of intra-operative maternal morbidity after repeating caesarean section
A study of intra-operative maternal morbidity after repeating caesarean section
Background: Caesarean section (CS) is one of the most common obstetric procedures worldwide and an increased rate of caesarean section has been observed in recent studies. Maternal...

