Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Patient Perspectives on Intravenous Biologics for Rheumatologic Disease

View through CrossRef
ObjectiveTwo surveys were conducted with patients with rheumatologic diseases to evaluate perceptions of different routes of administration (intravenous [IV] or subcutaneous [SC]) for biologic therapy.MethodsIn Survey I, patient preferences toward biologic treatment were evaluated at a rheumatology practice in Buffalo, New York. In Survey II, Canadian patients enrolled in the BioAdvance patient support program and scheduled to receive IV biologic therapy were asked about their opinions of IV treatment.ResultsIn Survey I, 243 rheumatology patients participated. Median patient age was 60 years, 76% were female, and 44% were naive to treatment with biologic agents. Among biologic‐naive patients, the majority (56%) were open to either SC or IV treatment; biologic‐naive women were more likely than men to express a preference for the route of administration. In Survey II, 1,598 patients from the BioAdvance program (including 306 rheumatology patients) completed the full survey. Among the rheumatology patients, the median age was 49 years, 58% were female, and 61% had not previously taken biologics before enrolling in the BioAdvance program. The median rating of IV favorability (on a 10‐point scale, with higher numbers indicating increased favorability) recalled by rheumatology patients was 5 prior to their first program infusion, which increased to 9 after multiple treatment infusions.ConclusionThese survey results indicate that patients with rheumatoid arthritis are generally open to IV treatment and express high satisfaction with IV therapy. Additional patient and provider education may improve shared decision‐making regarding biologic therapy administration options.
Title: Patient Perspectives on Intravenous Biologics for Rheumatologic Disease
Description:
ObjectiveTwo surveys were conducted with patients with rheumatologic diseases to evaluate perceptions of different routes of administration (intravenous [IV] or subcutaneous [SC]) for biologic therapy.
MethodsIn Survey I, patient preferences toward biologic treatment were evaluated at a rheumatology practice in Buffalo, New York.
In Survey II, Canadian patients enrolled in the BioAdvance patient support program and scheduled to receive IV biologic therapy were asked about their opinions of IV treatment.
ResultsIn Survey I, 243 rheumatology patients participated.
Median patient age was 60 years, 76% were female, and 44% were naive to treatment with biologic agents.
Among biologic‐naive patients, the majority (56%) were open to either SC or IV treatment; biologic‐naive women were more likely than men to express a preference for the route of administration.
In Survey II, 1,598 patients from the BioAdvance program (including 306 rheumatology patients) completed the full survey.
Among the rheumatology patients, the median age was 49 years, 58% were female, and 61% had not previously taken biologics before enrolling in the BioAdvance program.
The median rating of IV favorability (on a 10‐point scale, with higher numbers indicating increased favorability) recalled by rheumatology patients was 5 prior to their first program infusion, which increased to 9 after multiple treatment infusions.
ConclusionThese survey results indicate that patients with rheumatoid arthritis are generally open to IV treatment and express high satisfaction with IV therapy.
Additional patient and provider education may improve shared decision‐making regarding biologic therapy administration options.

Related Results

Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Quality improvement measures for early detection of severe intravenous infiltration in infants
Quality improvement measures for early detection of severe intravenous infiltration in infants
Intravenous infiltration is one of the most commonly seen morbidity in infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The risk of intravenous infiltration in preterm ...
Intravenous Ribavirin Treatment for Severe Adenovirus Disease in Immunocompromised Children
Intravenous Ribavirin Treatment for Severe Adenovirus Disease in Immunocompromised Children
Background. Adenovirus is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the immunocompromised host. The incidence of severe adenovirus disease in pediatrics is increasing in ass...
Recent Studies and Prospects of Biologics in Allergic Rhinitis Treatment
Recent Studies and Prospects of Biologics in Allergic Rhinitis Treatment
Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common and increasingly prevalent chronic inflammatory disorder of the nasal mucosa that severely impacts patients’ quality of life, causing symptoms li...
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct Introduction Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Dual biologics for severe asthma and atopic dermatitis: Synopsis of two cases and literature review
Dual biologics for severe asthma and atopic dermatitis: Synopsis of two cases and literature review
AbstractThe efficacy and safety of the combination of biologic therapies remain unclear with an ineffective and insufficient single biologic for managing asthma. Herein, we report ...

Back to Top