Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

S5. DOES THE TIME OF DRUG ADMINISTRATION ALTER THE ADVERSE EVENT RISK OF LURASIDONE?

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Lurasidone is once a day oral medication, which could be administered any time of the day, but the relationship between the timing of administration and the risk of developing adverse events has not been systematically evaluated. The purpose of this study was to examine whether there is a difference in the risk of adverse events between lurasidone administration in the morning and at night in the treatment of adult schizophrenia. Methods Randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of lurasidone in adults with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia were analyzed for the incidence of akathisia, somnolence, and nausea. We compared the risk of each adverse event and the risk differences (RDs) for each lurasidone dose versus placebo in patients taking lurasidone in the morning (AM dosing group) and those taking lurasidone at night (PM dosing group). Results Nine RCTs were included in the analysis (six RCTs with AM dosing and three RCTs with PM dosing). In the AM dosing group, lurasidone doses of 20, 40, 80, and 120 mg/day were evaluated, and in the PM dosing group, lurasidone doses of 20, 40, 80, and 160 mg/day were evaluated. The risk of akathisia increased in a dose-dependent manner in AM dosing group, this tendency, however, was not observed in PM dosing group. In addition, RD tended to be larger in AM dosing group than in PM dosing group at the same dose [AM dosing group: 20 mg/day=-4.1%, no significantly different from placebo (ns); 40 mg/day=7.1%, p<0.001; 80 mg/day=9.1%, p<0.001; 120 mg/day=20.3%, p<0.001, PM dosing group: 20 mg/day=3.2%, ns; 40 mg/day=2.3%, ns; 80 mg/day=8,7%, p<0.001; 160 mg/day=6.5%, p<0.01]. Similarly, the risk of somnolence increased in a dose-dependent manner in AM dosing group, however, this tendency was not clearly observed in PM dosing group. RD tended to be larger in AM dosing group than in PM dosing group at the same dose (AM dosing group: 20 mg/day=0.1%, ns; 40 mg/day=3.6%, p<0.05; 80 mg/day=4.9%, p<0.01; 120 mg/day=9.3%, p<0.001, PM dosing group: 20 mg/day=-0.4%, ns; 40 mg/day=2.8%, p<0.05: 80 mg/day=0.2%, ns; 160 mg/day=5.8%, p<0.05). There was no clear dose-dependent trend associated with nausea and RD was similar between AM and PM dosing group (AM dosing group: 20 mg/day=0.2% ns; 40 mg/day=3.8%, p<0.05; 80 mg/day=3.8%, ns; 120 mg/day=6.6%, ns, PM dosing group: 20 mg/day=-1.6%, ns; 40 mg/day=-1.7%, ns; 80 mg/day=5.5%, p<0.01; 160 mg/day=2.8%, ns). Discussion The risk of adverse events in the treatment of schizophrenia with lurasidone can vary depending on the timing of administration. In particular, for akathisia and somnolence, the incidence risks were reduced when lurasidone was administered in PM. Unlike with AM administration, the dose-dependence in the risks of these adverse events were not observed in lurasidone PM administration. The timing of lurasidone administration could be considered in effort to minimize potential adverse events.
Title: S5. DOES THE TIME OF DRUG ADMINISTRATION ALTER THE ADVERSE EVENT RISK OF LURASIDONE?
Description:
Abstract Background Lurasidone is once a day oral medication, which could be administered any time of the day, but the relationship between the timing of administration and the risk of developing adverse events has not been systematically evaluated.
The purpose of this study was to examine whether there is a difference in the risk of adverse events between lurasidone administration in the morning and at night in the treatment of adult schizophrenia.
Methods Randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of lurasidone in adults with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia were analyzed for the incidence of akathisia, somnolence, and nausea.
We compared the risk of each adverse event and the risk differences (RDs) for each lurasidone dose versus placebo in patients taking lurasidone in the morning (AM dosing group) and those taking lurasidone at night (PM dosing group).
Results Nine RCTs were included in the analysis (six RCTs with AM dosing and three RCTs with PM dosing).
In the AM dosing group, lurasidone doses of 20, 40, 80, and 120 mg/day were evaluated, and in the PM dosing group, lurasidone doses of 20, 40, 80, and 160 mg/day were evaluated.
The risk of akathisia increased in a dose-dependent manner in AM dosing group, this tendency, however, was not observed in PM dosing group.
In addition, RD tended to be larger in AM dosing group than in PM dosing group at the same dose [AM dosing group: 20 mg/day=-4.
1%, no significantly different from placebo (ns); 40 mg/day=7.
1%, p<0.
001; 80 mg/day=9.
1%, p<0.
001; 120 mg/day=20.
3%, p<0.
001, PM dosing group: 20 mg/day=3.
2%, ns; 40 mg/day=2.
3%, ns; 80 mg/day=8,7%, p<0.
001; 160 mg/day=6.
5%, p<0.
01].
Similarly, the risk of somnolence increased in a dose-dependent manner in AM dosing group, however, this tendency was not clearly observed in PM dosing group.
RD tended to be larger in AM dosing group than in PM dosing group at the same dose (AM dosing group: 20 mg/day=0.
1%, ns; 40 mg/day=3.
6%, p<0.
05; 80 mg/day=4.
9%, p<0.
01; 120 mg/day=9.
3%, p<0.
001, PM dosing group: 20 mg/day=-0.
4%, ns; 40 mg/day=2.
8%, p<0.
05: 80 mg/day=0.
2%, ns; 160 mg/day=5.
8%, p<0.
05).
There was no clear dose-dependent trend associated with nausea and RD was similar between AM and PM dosing group (AM dosing group: 20 mg/day=0.
2% ns; 40 mg/day=3.
8%, p<0.
05; 80 mg/day=3.
8%, ns; 120 mg/day=6.
6%, ns, PM dosing group: 20 mg/day=-1.
6%, ns; 40 mg/day=-1.
7%, ns; 80 mg/day=5.
5%, p<0.
01; 160 mg/day=2.
8%, ns).
Discussion The risk of adverse events in the treatment of schizophrenia with lurasidone can vary depending on the timing of administration.
In particular, for akathisia and somnolence, the incidence risks were reduced when lurasidone was administered in PM.
Unlike with AM administration, the dose-dependence in the risks of these adverse events were not observed in lurasidone PM administration.
The timing of lurasidone administration could be considered in effort to minimize potential adverse events.

Related Results

Changes in the pharmacokinetics of lurasidone in a pregnant woman with schizophrenia
Changes in the pharmacokinetics of lurasidone in a pregnant woman with schizophrenia
AbstractBackgroundThe population of pregnant women with schizophrenia is increasing. Managing schizophrenia during pregnancy poses unique challenges due to the potential effects of...
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract Introduction Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
Selection of Injectable Drug Product Composition using Machine Learning Models (Preprint)
Selection of Injectable Drug Product Composition using Machine Learning Models (Preprint)
BACKGROUND As of July 2020, a Web of Science search of “machine learning (ML)” nested within the search of “pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics” yielded over 100...
Event Management Bandung Sneaker Season
Event Management Bandung Sneaker Season
Abstract. Bandung Sneaker Season is the first sneakers and streetwear event to be held in Bandung, an annual event that was first created in 2018 by Maks.co Event Organizer. At the...
Development, Testing, and Findings of a Pediatric-Focused Trigger Tool to Identify Medication-Related Harm in US Children's Hospitals
Development, Testing, and Findings of a Pediatric-Focused Trigger Tool to Identify Medication-Related Harm in US Children's Hospitals
OBJECTIVES. The purposes of this study were to develop a pediatric-focused tool for adverse drug event detection and describe the incidence and characteristics of adverse drug even...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Generalized enrichment analysis improves the detection of adverse drug events from the biomedical literature
Generalized enrichment analysis improves the detection of adverse drug events from the biomedical literature
Abstract Background Identification of associations between marketed drugs and adverse events from the biomedical literature assists drug safety moni...

Back to Top