Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Physiology-Based Electrocardiographic Criteria for Left Bundle Branch Capture
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
During left bundle branch (LBB) area pacing, it is important to confirm that the capture of the LBB is achieved, not just the capture of only the adjacent left ventricular myocardium (LV septal capture). Our aim was to establish ECG criteria for LBB capture by analyzing ECGs with confirmed LBB capture and non-capture. We hypothesized that since LBB pacing results in physiologic depolarization of the left ventricle then the native QRS can serve as a reference for the diagnosis of LBB capture in the same patient.
Methods
Only patients with direct evidence of LBB capture (output-dependent or refractoriness-dependent QRS morphology transition) were included. Several QRS characteristics were compared between the native rhythm and different types of LBB area capture. Receiver-operator characteristics analysis was performed to determine the optimal V6 R-wave peak time (RWPT) cut-off for LBB diagnosis.
Results
A total of 357 ECG tracing (124 patients) were analyzed: 118 with native rhythm, 124 with non-selective LBB capture, 69 with selective LBB capture and 46 with LV septal capture. Our hypotheses that during LBB capture the paced V6 RWPT (measured from QRS onset) equals the native V6 RWPT and that the paced V6 RWPT (measured from the stimulus) equals the LBB potential to V6 R-wave peak interval were positively validated. Criteria based on these rules had sensitivity and specificity of 98.0–88.2% and 85.7–95.4%, respectively. The optimal and 100% specific V6 RWPT values for differentiation between LBB capture and LV septal capture in patients with narrow QRS / right bundle branch block were 83 ms and 74 ms, respectively; while in patients with left bundle branch block/asystole/ventricular escape the optimal and 100% specific V6 RWPT values were 101 ms and 80 ms, respectively.
Conclusions
Novel criteria for LBB capture were developed and optimal V6 RWPT cut-offs were determined.
What this study adds
We showed that LBB pacing truly reproduce the physiological depolarization of the left ventricle since the paced V6 RWPT equals the native conduction V6 RWPT.
Individualized LBB capture criteria, that use the native QRS as a reference, were developed.
The optimal V6 RWPT values for differentiation between LBB capture and LV septal capture were determined, separately for patients with healthy and diseased LBB.
Title: Physiology-Based Electrocardiographic Criteria for Left Bundle Branch Capture
Description:
Abstract
Background
During left bundle branch (LBB) area pacing, it is important to confirm that the capture of the LBB is achieved, not just the capture of only the adjacent left ventricular myocardium (LV septal capture).
Our aim was to establish ECG criteria for LBB capture by analyzing ECGs with confirmed LBB capture and non-capture.
We hypothesized that since LBB pacing results in physiologic depolarization of the left ventricle then the native QRS can serve as a reference for the diagnosis of LBB capture in the same patient.
Methods
Only patients with direct evidence of LBB capture (output-dependent or refractoriness-dependent QRS morphology transition) were included.
Several QRS characteristics were compared between the native rhythm and different types of LBB area capture.
Receiver-operator characteristics analysis was performed to determine the optimal V6 R-wave peak time (RWPT) cut-off for LBB diagnosis.
Results
A total of 357 ECG tracing (124 patients) were analyzed: 118 with native rhythm, 124 with non-selective LBB capture, 69 with selective LBB capture and 46 with LV septal capture.
Our hypotheses that during LBB capture the paced V6 RWPT (measured from QRS onset) equals the native V6 RWPT and that the paced V6 RWPT (measured from the stimulus) equals the LBB potential to V6 R-wave peak interval were positively validated.
Criteria based on these rules had sensitivity and specificity of 98.
0–88.
2% and 85.
7–95.
4%, respectively.
The optimal and 100% specific V6 RWPT values for differentiation between LBB capture and LV septal capture in patients with narrow QRS / right bundle branch block were 83 ms and 74 ms, respectively; while in patients with left bundle branch block/asystole/ventricular escape the optimal and 100% specific V6 RWPT values were 101 ms and 80 ms, respectively.
Conclusions
Novel criteria for LBB capture were developed and optimal V6 RWPT cut-offs were determined.
What this study adds
We showed that LBB pacing truly reproduce the physiological depolarization of the left ventricle since the paced V6 RWPT equals the native conduction V6 RWPT.
Individualized LBB capture criteria, that use the native QRS as a reference, were developed.
The optimal V6 RWPT values for differentiation between LBB capture and LV septal capture were determined, separately for patients with healthy and diseased LBB.
Related Results
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a recently identified immune-mediated condition that is debilitating and often overlooked. While IgG4-RD has be...
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Approach to Left Bundle Branch Pacing
Approach to Left Bundle Branch Pacing
Cardiac pacing refers to the implantation tool serving as a treatment modality for various indications, the most common of which is symptomatic bradyarrhythmia. Left bundle branch ...
Hydatid Cyst of The Orbit: A Systematic Review with Meta-Data
Hydatid Cyst of The Orbit: A Systematic Review with Meta-Data
Abstarct
Introduction
Orbital hydatid cysts (HCs) constitute less than 1% of all cases of hydatidosis, yet their occurrence is often linked to severe visual complications. This stu...
Measurement of b-hadron branching fractions for two-body decays into charmless charged hadrons
Measurement of b-hadron branching fractions for two-body decays into charmless charged hadrons
Abstract
Based on data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 0.37 fb−1 collected by the LHCb experiment in 2011, the following ratios of branching fract...
Bilateral Bundle Branch Block
Bilateral Bundle Branch Block
This report describes the clinical and electrocardiographic features in 30 cases of complete right bundle branch block associated with a block of the anterior fascicle of the left ...
Prevalence, clinical and angiography of Coronary Artery Disease in patients with chest pain with left bundle branch block in Iraqi Centers of Heart Disease
Prevalence, clinical and angiography of Coronary Artery Disease in patients with chest pain with left bundle branch block in Iraqi Centers of Heart Disease
Introduction and Aim: Left bundle branch block (LBBB), is seen on the electrocardiograms, when the His-Purkinje system disrupts the normal sequence of activation is changed in the ...
John B. Barlow: Master clinician and compleat cardiologist
John B. Barlow: Master clinician and compleat cardiologist
AbstractThis paper reports the case of a 76‐year‐old man in whom atrial flutter with varying atrioventricular block and intermittent right bundle‐branch block was found. This is th...

