Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Criminal Responsibility in International Criminal Law; The Sylvania Case
View through CrossRef
The Hague Regulations specify that no penalty can be inflicted on persons for acts for which they are not responsible. The Fourth Geneva Convention provides that “no protected person may be punished for an offence he or she has not personally committed” The requirement of individual criminal responsibility is recognized as a fundamental rule of criminal procedure in Additional Protocols I and II. The requirement of individual criminal responsibility is explicitly provided for in several military manuals. It is a basic rule of most, if not all, national legal systems. The requirement of individual criminal responsibility is included in the American Convention on Human Rights (as a non-derogable right), the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam. The European Convention on Human Rights does not spell out this rule, but the European Court of Human Rights has stated that “it is a fundamental rule of criminal law that criminal liability does not survive the person who has committed the criminal act”. It is a basic principle of criminal law that individual criminal responsibility for a crime includes attempting to commit such crime, as well as assisting in, facilitating, aiding or abetting, the commission of a crime. It also includes planning or instigating the commission of a crime. This is confirmed, for example, in the Statute of the International Criminal Court. Article 28 of the Statute also confirms the principle of command responsibility for crimes under international law.The principles of individual responsibility and command responsibility for war crimes are dealt with in Chapter 43.
Title: Criminal Responsibility in International Criminal Law; The Sylvania Case
Description:
The Hague Regulations specify that no penalty can be inflicted on persons for acts for which they are not responsible.
The Fourth Geneva Convention provides that “no protected person may be punished for an offence he or she has not personally committed” The requirement of individual criminal responsibility is recognized as a fundamental rule of criminal procedure in Additional Protocols I and II.
The requirement of individual criminal responsibility is explicitly provided for in several military manuals.
It is a basic rule of most, if not all, national legal systems.
The requirement of individual criminal responsibility is included in the American Convention on Human Rights (as a non-derogable right), the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam.
The European Convention on Human Rights does not spell out this rule, but the European Court of Human Rights has stated that “it is a fundamental rule of criminal law that criminal liability does not survive the person who has committed the criminal act”.
It is a basic principle of criminal law that individual criminal responsibility for a crime includes attempting to commit such crime, as well as assisting in, facilitating, aiding or abetting, the commission of a crime.
It also includes planning or instigating the commission of a crime.
This is confirmed, for example, in the Statute of the International Criminal Court.
Article 28 of the Statute also confirms the principle of command responsibility for crimes under international law.
The principles of individual responsibility and command responsibility for war crimes are dealt with in Chapter 43.
Related Results
Mezinárodní právo na prahu 21. století (dosažený stav, neúspěchy a perspektivy)
Mezinárodní právo na prahu 21. století (dosažený stav, neúspěchy a perspektivy)
The study deal with selected problems of international law at the time of change of the 20th and 21st centuries. Such a milestone gives an opportunity to review the achieved state ...
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...
ANKSI KEBIRI KIMIA BSAGI PELAKU KEJAHATAN SEKSUAL TERHADAP ANAK
ANKSI KEBIRI KIMIA BSAGI PELAKU KEJAHATAN SEKSUAL TERHADAP ANAK
Sexual crime case against children’s in Indonesia are increasing rapidly from time to time. The more tragic fact is that most of the suspect origins from their own kin or around ...
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Participation In Crimal Acts According In Islamic Criminal Law
Participation In Crimal Acts According In Islamic Criminal Law
<p>The current Research This research aims to explore the views of Islamic criminal law in relation to the the concept of participation in a criminal offense. The research me...
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Photo by Sean Pollock on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
Bioethics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) were born out of similar concerns, such as the reaction to scandal and the restraint ...
A Study on the Theoretical Foundation of Cyber Criminal Jurisprudence
A Study on the Theoretical Foundation of Cyber Criminal Jurisprudence
Cyber criminal law can be defined as a new legal field that deals with legal issues related to crimes occurring in the digital environment. This field has emerged out of necessity ...
Individual Criminal Responsibility
Individual Criminal Responsibility
The recognition of individual criminal responsibility under international law is relatively recent. The commission of mass atrocities during the 20th century prompted the internati...

