Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Das Subjekt des Konsums in der Kultur der Moderne: Der kulturelle Wandel der Konsumtion

View through Europeana Collections
“Consumption” is not only a specific sociological field of analysis; it must be taken into account appropriately, challenges the theory of society and modernity as a whole. The paper aims to accomplish two things: (a) In a historical-sociological scheme that is based on the 19 and In the 20th century, the emergence of the unusual consumption orientation of the modern subject form is to be explained by a cultural transfer of elements from aesthetic movements, countercultures of modernity (romanticism, modernism, postmodernism) into the dominant culture of modernity. The coding of the decidedly anti-consumerist bourgeois culture of classical modernity is thus completely reversed. To understand what “consumption” means in modernity and how it could emerge requires sociology to recognize the relevance of aesthetic movements for the development of modernity and to highlight the competition of bourgeois and post-bourgeois culture. b) The consumption orientation of state-of-the-art subjects can be understood as the acquisition of specific esthetic-expressive competences (experiential ability, creativity, self-stylization). This does not mean that the classical sociological question about social inequalities would become irrelevant. Rather, social inequality has to be conceptualized differently from classical understanding: not as an inequality of resources, but as an inequality of competences, namely competences that were first those of aesthetic countercultures. Under modern conditions, the social success and the successful identity of subjects depends on their ability to experience, creativity and self-stylize, their respective abilities to consume. Ironically, dispositions of the subject of “revolting” aesthetic countercultures have become a normative set of successful subjects, whose failure to do so pays the price of new social exclusion."(author’s abstract)
GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences. Library Cologne
image-zoom
Title: Das Subjekt des Konsums in der Kultur der Moderne: Der kulturelle Wandel der Konsumtion
Description:
“Consumption” is not only a specific sociological field of analysis; it must be taken into account appropriately, challenges the theory of society and modernity as a whole.
The paper aims to accomplish two things: (a) In a historical-sociological scheme that is based on the 19 and In the 20th century, the emergence of the unusual consumption orientation of the modern subject form is to be explained by a cultural transfer of elements from aesthetic movements, countercultures of modernity (romanticism, modernism, postmodernism) into the dominant culture of modernity.
The coding of the decidedly anti-consumerist bourgeois culture of classical modernity is thus completely reversed.
To understand what “consumption” means in modernity and how it could emerge requires sociology to recognize the relevance of aesthetic movements for the development of modernity and to highlight the competition of bourgeois and post-bourgeois culture.
b) The consumption orientation of state-of-the-art subjects can be understood as the acquisition of specific esthetic-expressive competences (experiential ability, creativity, self-stylization).
This does not mean that the classical sociological question about social inequalities would become irrelevant.
Rather, social inequality has to be conceptualized differently from classical understanding: not as an inequality of resources, but as an inequality of competences, namely competences that were first those of aesthetic countercultures.
Under modern conditions, the social success and the successful identity of subjects depends on their ability to experience, creativity and self-stylize, their respective abilities to consume.
Ironically, dispositions of the subject of “revolting” aesthetic countercultures have become a normative set of successful subjects, whose failure to do so pays the price of new social exclusion.
"(author’s abstract).

Related Results

Konsummotive bei Konsumenten von amphetaminartigen Substanzen (ATS)
Konsummotive bei Konsumenten von amphetaminartigen Substanzen (ATS)
Die vorliegende Arbeit1 beschäftigt sich mit der systematischen Untersuchung der Motive, amphetaminartige Substanzen (amphetamine-type stimulants, kurz: ATS) zu konsumieren, und um...
REGULAR ARTICLES
REGULAR ARTICLES
L. Cowen and C. J. Schwarz       657Les Radio‐tags, en raison de leur détectabilitéélevée, ...
Résumés des conférences JRANF 2021
Résumés des conférences JRANF 2021
able des matières Résumés. 140 Agenda Formation en Radioprotection JRANF 2021 Ouagadougou. 140 RPF 1 Rappel des unités de doses. 140 RPF 2 Risques déterministes et stochastique...
Avant-propos
Avant-propos
L’Agriculture Biologique (AB) se présente comme un mode de production agricole spécifique basé sur le respect d’un certain nombre de principes et de pratiques visant à réduire au m...
Socioanthropologie
Socioanthropologie
Le contexte actuel tel que le dessinent les tendances lourdes de ce troisième millénaire convie à interpeller les outils des science sociales forgés précédemment. La compréhension ...
De la poésie à la peinture
De la poésie à la peinture
La poésie et la peinture étaient toujours deux différentes expressions de l’esprit et de l’âme de l’homme qui sont dédiées à présenter absolument chacune à sa façon ce qui était di...
Photolabile Schutzgruppen und ihre Anwendung zur wellenlängenselektiven Aktivierung und Deaktivierung eines Antibiotikums
Photolabile Schutzgruppen und ihre Anwendung zur wellenlängenselektiven Aktivierung und Deaktivierung eines Antibiotikums
Die Verwendung von photolabilen Schutzgruppen zur nicht-invasiven Kontrolle von Systemen birgt ein großes Potential für verschiedenste Anwendungsgebiete, die von der Erforschung un...

Back to Top