Javascript must be enabled to continue!
PP33 Use of point of care ultrasound in prehospital care: an interview study
View through CrossRef
BackgroundPoint of Care Ultrasound (PoCUS) is a currently available and rapidly developing technology but still not widely used in the UK. Prehospital PoCUS could help to prioritise initial treatment, procedures and appropriate patient conveyance.A recent literature review suggests that the image quality, portability and cost of ultrasound devices are improving with widening indications for prehospital PoCUS but evidence of prehospital use and impact is needed in the UK. We aimed to explore the views of practitioners (who use ultrasound in practice) on the potential role of PoCUS and the facilitators associated with its use in prehospital care.MethodsWe conducted a qualitative interview study using purposive sampling through social media and a snowballing technique to recruit eligible participants. Individual interviews were conducted online via Microsoft Teams. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using a Thematic Framework approach assisted by NVivo 12 software until data saturation.ResultsIn total, 16 practitioners aged between 36 and 62 years, with a range of professional backgrounds including paramedics and prehospital emergency physicians, participated in interviews. Participants identified several facilitators to support a widespread implementation of PoCUS in prehospital care: resource requirements for purchase and deployment of devices, sufficient time and a skilled workforce; paying special attention to training, education and support needs; ensuring there is proper organisational governance, guidelines and quality assurance; and including supportive staff, champions and leadership in workforce considerations. Enabling ease of use in aiding decision making and taking unintended consequences or incidental findings into consideration; and more robust evidence to support perceptions of improved patient outcomes and experience, were also identified as facilitators.ConclusionsPrehospital PoCUS could be a useful intervention for improving care processes and patient health outcomes. However, the facilitators identified should be considered for a widespread implementation of prehospital PoCUS.
Title: PP33 Use of point of care ultrasound in prehospital care: an interview study
Description:
BackgroundPoint of Care Ultrasound (PoCUS) is a currently available and rapidly developing technology but still not widely used in the UK.
Prehospital PoCUS could help to prioritise initial treatment, procedures and appropriate patient conveyance.
A recent literature review suggests that the image quality, portability and cost of ultrasound devices are improving with widening indications for prehospital PoCUS but evidence of prehospital use and impact is needed in the UK.
We aimed to explore the views of practitioners (who use ultrasound in practice) on the potential role of PoCUS and the facilitators associated with its use in prehospital care.
MethodsWe conducted a qualitative interview study using purposive sampling through social media and a snowballing technique to recruit eligible participants.
Individual interviews were conducted online via Microsoft Teams.
The interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using a Thematic Framework approach assisted by NVivo 12 software until data saturation.
ResultsIn total, 16 practitioners aged between 36 and 62 years, with a range of professional backgrounds including paramedics and prehospital emergency physicians, participated in interviews.
Participants identified several facilitators to support a widespread implementation of PoCUS in prehospital care: resource requirements for purchase and deployment of devices, sufficient time and a skilled workforce; paying special attention to training, education and support needs; ensuring there is proper organisational governance, guidelines and quality assurance; and including supportive staff, champions and leadership in workforce considerations.
Enabling ease of use in aiding decision making and taking unintended consequences or incidental findings into consideration; and more robust evidence to support perceptions of improved patient outcomes and experience, were also identified as facilitators.
ConclusionsPrehospital PoCUS could be a useful intervention for improving care processes and patient health outcomes.
However, the facilitators identified should be considered for a widespread implementation of prehospital PoCUS.
Related Results
Barriers to access prehospital care in Jimma City, Oromiya Region of Ethiopia
Barriers to access prehospital care in Jimma City, Oromiya Region of Ethiopia
Background: African nations experience a significant proportion of the global burden of death and disability. The provision of prehospital emergency care has been shown to partiall...
776 Quality Improvement in Prehospital Burn Care
776 Quality Improvement in Prehospital Burn Care
Abstract
Introduction
Burn center implemented a new quality improvement program with emergency medical services (EMS) that exami...
Neurological outcomes in children dead on hospital arrival
Neurological outcomes in children dead on hospital arrival
Abstract
Introduction
Obtaining favorable neurological outcomes is extremely difficult in children transported to a hospital without a prehospital r...
Impact of Response Time and Prehospital Care on Mortality in Road Traffic Accidents of Balochistan
Impact of Response Time and Prehospital Care on Mortality in Road Traffic Accidents of Balochistan
Background: Road traffic accidents (RTAs) are a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide, with delayed emergency response and inadequate prehospital care significantly im...
Patient Handover and Continuity of Care Challenges in Saudi Prehospital Services
Patient Handover and Continuity of Care Challenges in Saudi Prehospital Services
In Saudi Arabia, the efficacy of prehospital services is increasingly scrutinized, particularly in the context of patient handover and continuity of care. Effective handover practi...
The feasibility of civilian prehospital trauma teams carrying and administering packed red blood cells
The feasibility of civilian prehospital trauma teams carrying and administering packed red blood cells
ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility, limitations and costs involved in providing prehospital trauma teams with packed red blood cells (pRBCs) for use in the prehospital setting.Me...
Abstract 4137905: The association between prehospital epinephrine administration and short-term outcomes in patients with shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a propensity matched analysis
Abstract 4137905: The association between prehospital epinephrine administration and short-term outcomes in patients with shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a propensity matched analysis
Background:
In out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with an initial shockable rhythm, epinephrine increases the likelihood of return of spontaneous circulatio...
Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice towards acute pain management in the prehospital setting and associated factors among emergency care providers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study
Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice towards acute pain management in the prehospital setting and associated factors among emergency care providers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study
Abstract
Background
Acute pain is a predominant problem in the prehospital setting. Acute pain management in the prehospital setting requires precise and competent skills ...

