Javascript must be enabled to continue!
L26/O-212 The presence of ovarian endometrioma adversely affect the IVF/ ICSI outcomes: a multicenter propensity score–matched study
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Study question
To evaluate the impact of endometrioma on IVF/ICSI outcomes in patient underwent IVF/ICSI, taking into account of subsequent vitrified embryo transfers.
Summary answer
In women undergoing IVF, endometrioma was associated with a lower CLBR.
What is known already
Endometriomas are well-konwn to suppress IVF/ICSI outcomes. However, existing literature remains controversial regarding their independent impact on oocyte quality, implantation potential, and specifically cumulative live birth rates (CLBR), necessitating large-scale controlled analyses to clarify these long-term prognosis outcomes.
Study design, size, duration
This multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted in university-affiliated hospitals or large academic hospitals in China, including infertile patients undergoing their first IVF/ICSI cycle. Propensity score (PS) matching was conducted to tackle the large gap of multiple maternal factors between the cohorts.
Participants/materials, setting, methods
The primary outcome was the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) within two years of oocyte retrieval. A comprehensive statistical analysis was performed, utilizing generalized estimated equation regression for per-transfer outcomes. The CLBR was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves with a log-rank test, and a Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the independent prognostic significance of endometrioma. Subgroup analyses were also conducted based on age, AFC, and stimulation protocol.
Main results and the role of chance
Following propensity score matching, 2260 women in the endometrioma group were matched to 6750 women in the control group. The AMH(4.27±3.53 vs 4.68±3.23, p < 0.01), AFC(11.18±5.06 vs 13.68±5.32, p < 0.01) were significantly lower in the endometrioma group than in the control group. The endometrioma group had significantly lower implantation rates(50.0% vs. 53.2%), clinical pregnancy rates per transfer (63.1% vs. 65.5%), and live birth rates per transfer (46.2% vs. 49.3%). Using the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the cumulative incidence of ongoing pregnancy leading to live birth was significantly lower in the endometrioma group than in the control group (57.1% vs 61.9%, HR:0.87, 95% CI: 0.81-0.92) (Figure 1). A Cox proportional hazard model revealed that women who had endometrioma were 0.815 times less likely to achieve a live birth (HR:0.82; 95% CI: 0.76-0.87). Subgroup analysis revealed that women who had endometrioma were less likely to achieve a live birth across the younger strata (aged < =35 years) (59.2% vs 64.8%, HR:0.86, 95% CI: 0.80-0.92), and 1 AFC strata (AFC>5) (58.8% vs 62.7%, HR:0.89, 95% CI: 0.83-0.95).
Limitations, reasons for caution
The retrospective design introduces selection biases, despite rigorous propensity score matching.
Wider implications of the findings
These findings suggest endometrioma impairs IVF outcomes beyond mere reserve diminution, likely affecting oocyte quality or endometrial receptivity. Clinicians should provide realistic counseling regarding reduced cumulative success rates, particularly for younger patients and those with normal AFC who might otherwise overestimate their prognosis.
Trial registration number
No
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: L26/O-212 The presence of ovarian endometrioma adversely affect the IVF/ ICSI outcomes: a multicenter propensity score–matched study
Description:
Abstract
Study question
To evaluate the impact of endometrioma on IVF/ICSI outcomes in patient underwent IVF/ICSI, taking into account of subsequent vitrified embryo transfers.
Summary answer
In women undergoing IVF, endometrioma was associated with a lower CLBR.
What is known already
Endometriomas are well-konwn to suppress IVF/ICSI outcomes.
However, existing literature remains controversial regarding their independent impact on oocyte quality, implantation potential, and specifically cumulative live birth rates (CLBR), necessitating large-scale controlled analyses to clarify these long-term prognosis outcomes.
Study design, size, duration
This multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted in university-affiliated hospitals or large academic hospitals in China, including infertile patients undergoing their first IVF/ICSI cycle.
Propensity score (PS) matching was conducted to tackle the large gap of multiple maternal factors between the cohorts.
Participants/materials, setting, methods
The primary outcome was the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) within two years of oocyte retrieval.
A comprehensive statistical analysis was performed, utilizing generalized estimated equation regression for per-transfer outcomes.
The CLBR was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves with a log-rank test, and a Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the independent prognostic significance of endometrioma.
Subgroup analyses were also conducted based on age, AFC, and stimulation protocol.
Main results and the role of chance
Following propensity score matching, 2260 women in the endometrioma group were matched to 6750 women in the control group.
The AMH(4.
27±3.
53 vs 4.
68±3.
23, p < 0.
01), AFC(11.
18±5.
06 vs 13.
68±5.
32, p < 0.
01) were significantly lower in the endometrioma group than in the control group.
The endometrioma group had significantly lower implantation rates(50.
0% vs.
53.
2%), clinical pregnancy rates per transfer (63.
1% vs.
65.
5%), and live birth rates per transfer (46.
2% vs.
49.
3%).
Using the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the cumulative incidence of ongoing pregnancy leading to live birth was significantly lower in the endometrioma group than in the control group (57.
1% vs 61.
9%, HR:0.
87, 95% CI: 0.
81-0.
92) (Figure 1).
A Cox proportional hazard model revealed that women who had endometrioma were 0.
815 times less likely to achieve a live birth (HR:0.
82; 95% CI: 0.
76-0.
87).
Subgroup analysis revealed that women who had endometrioma were less likely to achieve a live birth across the younger strata (aged < =35 years) (59.
2% vs 64.
8%, HR:0.
86, 95% CI: 0.
80-0.
92), and 1 AFC strata (AFC>5) (58.
8% vs 62.
7%, HR:0.
89, 95% CI: 0.
83-0.
95).
Limitations, reasons for caution
The retrospective design introduces selection biases, despite rigorous propensity score matching.
Wider implications of the findings
These findings suggest endometrioma impairs IVF outcomes beyond mere reserve diminution, likely affecting oocyte quality or endometrial receptivity.
Clinicians should provide realistic counseling regarding reduced cumulative success rates, particularly for younger patients and those with normal AFC who might otherwise overestimate their prognosis.
Trial registration number
No.
Related Results
What is the impact of endometrioma on IVF/ICSI outcomes in patients with endometriosis: A retrospective study
What is the impact of endometrioma on IVF/ICSI outcomes in patients with endometriosis: A retrospective study
Abstract
Background
Does endometrioma per se, different from endometriosis, have specific impacts on IVF/ICSI outcomes? Dose cystectomy of the endometrioma improve IVF/ICS...
O-196 The impact of providing couples with their IVF-prognosis on the expectations and anxiety of women and men
O-196 The impact of providing couples with their IVF-prognosis on the expectations and anxiety of women and men
Abstract
Study question
What is the impact of providing couples with their IVF-prognosis on expectations and anxiety in women an...
P-229 Has rampant use of ICSI wiped out Conventional IVF for non male factor infertility, or can Conventional IVF hold its ground
P-229 Has rampant use of ICSI wiped out Conventional IVF for non male factor infertility, or can Conventional IVF hold its ground
Abstract
Study question
Can ICSI completely replace and produce higher implantation rates as compared to conventional IVF for no...
Cost-effectiveness of medically assisted reproduction or expectant management for unexplained subfertility: when to start treatment?
Cost-effectiveness of medically assisted reproduction or expectant management for unexplained subfertility: when to start treatment?
AbstractSTUDY QUESTIONOver a time period of 3 years, which order of expectant management (EM), IUI with ovarian stimulation (IUI-OS) and IVF is the most cost-effective for couples ...
Presence of Endometrioma Decreased Blastocyst Formation Rate but Not Impair Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) outcome
Presence of Endometrioma Decreased Blastocyst Formation Rate but Not Impair Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) outcome
Abstract
Purpose: These study aims to assess the impact of endometrioma on patients who undergo ART treatment due to endometriosis.
Methods: Retrospective study was conduct...
Randomized allocation of oocytes to IVF or ICSI for IVF-naïve cases with unexplained infertility in an IVF-ICSI Split protocol favors ICSI to optimize live birth outcomes
Randomized allocation of oocytes to IVF or ICSI for IVF-naïve cases with unexplained infertility in an IVF-ICSI Split protocol favors ICSI to optimize live birth outcomes
In assisted reproduction treatments (ART), applying the ICSI method for fertilization of oocytes rather than traditional IVF method, is regarded as controversial for two reasons, n...
P-072 Fresh testicular sperm seems to yield more fertilization abnormalities and early pregnancy loss than frozen testicular sperm
P-072 Fresh testicular sperm seems to yield more fertilization abnormalities and early pregnancy loss than frozen testicular sperm
Abstract
Study question
How do ICSI outcomes using fresh testicular sperm, compare to those using frozen samples cryopreserved f...
O-147 Factors influencing ICSI outcome after sperm retrieval in nonobstructive azoospermia patients with different types of etiologies: a retrospective study of 1157 patients
O-147 Factors influencing ICSI outcome after sperm retrieval in nonobstructive azoospermia patients with different types of etiologies: a retrospective study of 1157 patients
Abstract
Study question
What are predictors of fertilization, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and livebirth delivery outcomes af...

