Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparison of the clinical performance of self-adhering flowable composite and resin-based pit and fissure sealant: a randomized clinical trial
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background: Self-adhering flowable composites are an innovative step in reducing the chair time of pit and fissure sealant treatment. This study aimed to compare the clinical performance of self-adhering flowable composite (SELF-ADH) and resin-based pit and fissure sealant (RBs).
Methods: This is a double-blinded, randomized, split-mouth clinical trial conducted on 80 fully erupted permanent mandibular first molars from 40 children aged 6 to 12 years. For each participant, two permanent molars were randomly treated with SELF-ADH or RB. All sealants were assessed at 3, 6, and 12-month follow-ups considering retention, marginal integrity, marginal discolouration, colour matching, surface texture, and caries recurrence. To analyse the data, logistic regression and Fisher's exact tests were used (significance level P < 0.05).
Results: At the 12-month follow-up, the number of fully retained sealants in the SELF-ADH group was 5.37 times greater than that in the RB group (P < 0.001). The success rate of marginal integrity in the SELF-ADH group was also 2.31 times greater than that in the RB group (P = 0.013), while the marginal discolouration was 2.23 times greater in the RB group (P < 0.001). The incidence of recurrent caries in teeth with partial loss of sealant in both groups (P = 0.004, P < 0.001) increased significantly over time.
Conclusion: The retention and marginal integrity of the self-adhering flowable composite were significantly greater than those of the resin-based sealant. Therefore, due to the small number of work steps, flowable self-adhering composites can be used as alternatives to resin-based pit and fissure sealants.
Trial registration: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kerman University of Medical Sciences with the code IR.KMU.REC.1399.556 and Iraninan Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) code IRCT20180521039763N4, as well as full compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Comparison of the clinical performance of self-adhering flowable composite and resin-based pit and fissure sealant: a randomized clinical trial
Description:
Abstract
Background: Self-adhering flowable composites are an innovative step in reducing the chair time of pit and fissure sealant treatment.
This study aimed to compare the clinical performance of self-adhering flowable composite (SELF-ADH) and resin-based pit and fissure sealant (RBs).
Methods: This is a double-blinded, randomized, split-mouth clinical trial conducted on 80 fully erupted permanent mandibular first molars from 40 children aged 6 to 12 years.
For each participant, two permanent molars were randomly treated with SELF-ADH or RB.
All sealants were assessed at 3, 6, and 12-month follow-ups considering retention, marginal integrity, marginal discolouration, colour matching, surface texture, and caries recurrence.
To analyse the data, logistic regression and Fisher's exact tests were used (significance level P < 0.
05).
Results: At the 12-month follow-up, the number of fully retained sealants in the SELF-ADH group was 5.
37 times greater than that in the RB group (P < 0.
001).
The success rate of marginal integrity in the SELF-ADH group was also 2.
31 times greater than that in the RB group (P = 0.
013), while the marginal discolouration was 2.
23 times greater in the RB group (P < 0.
001).
The incidence of recurrent caries in teeth with partial loss of sealant in both groups (P = 0.
004, P < 0.
001) increased significantly over time.
Conclusion: The retention and marginal integrity of the self-adhering flowable composite were significantly greater than those of the resin-based sealant.
Therefore, due to the small number of work steps, flowable self-adhering composites can be used as alternatives to resin-based pit and fissure sealants.
Trial registration: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kerman University of Medical Sciences with the code IR.
KMU.
REC.
1399.
556 and Iraninan Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) code IRCT20180521039763N4, as well as full compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Related Results
In Vitro Microleakage Comparison of Flowable Nanocomposites and Conventional Materials Used in Pit and Fissure Sealant Therapy
In Vitro Microleakage Comparison of Flowable Nanocomposites and Conventional Materials Used in Pit and Fissure Sealant Therapy
Objectives: Pit and fissure sealants are recognized as an effective preventive approach in pediatric dentistry. Composite resin is the most commonly used sealant material. Adding n...
PERBEDAAN TOPICAL FLUORIDE APPLICATION DAN FISSURE SEALANT DALAM MENCEGAH KARIES PADAGIGI MOLAR SATU
PERBEDAAN TOPICAL FLUORIDE APPLICATION DAN FISSURE SEALANT DALAM MENCEGAH KARIES PADAGIGI MOLAR SATU
Abstract: Topical Fluoride Application And Fissure Sealant To Prevent Dental Caries Permanent First Molars. Anatomy pits and fissures of teeth are caries initiation vulnerable area...
Analisis Pelepasan Ion Fluorida Dari Resin Komposit Flowable Setelah Direndam Dalam Susu UHT
Analisis Pelepasan Ion Fluorida Dari Resin Komposit Flowable Setelah Direndam Dalam Susu UHT
Abstrak
Upaya preventif dapat dilakukan, untuk mencegah terjadinya karies gigi pada anak, yaitu dengan aplikasi fissure sealant. Salah satu bahan sealant adalah resin komposit flo...
A Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Moisture Tolerant Pit and Fissure Sealant and Flowable Composite: An In vitro Study
A Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Moisture Tolerant Pit and Fissure Sealant and Flowable Composite: An In vitro Study
Abstract
Background
The retention rate of a pit and fissure sealant is directly related to the micromechanical bond between the sealant and ename...
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract
Introduction
Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
Differences of Microleakage Between Pit and Fissure Sealant Materials Composite Resin and RMGIC
Differences of Microleakage Between Pit and Fissure Sealant Materials Composite Resin and RMGIC
The shape of deep and narrow pits and fissures can be a place of retention for both bacteria and debris and if this condition is left untreated, it can develop into caries. Effecti...
Adhesion of Resin-Resin and Resin–Lithium Disilicate Ceramic: A Methodological Assessment
Adhesion of Resin-Resin and Resin–Lithium Disilicate Ceramic: A Methodological Assessment
The aim of this study was to evaluate four test methods on the adhesion of resin composite to resin composite, and resin composite to glass ceramic. Resin composite specimens (N = ...
Factors associated with positive perceptions of sealant use on permanent molars among Brazilian dentists
Factors associated with positive perceptions of sealant use on permanent molars among Brazilian dentists
Abstract This study aimed to analyze the factors associated with the perception among Brazilian dentists of the preventive or therapeutic use of sealants on permanent molars. A cro...

