Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Electronic adverse incident reporting in hospitals

View through CrossRef
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to assess attitudes toward and use of an electronic adverse incident reporting system in all four hospitals in one National Health Service Scotland Health Board area.Design/methodology/approachA questionnaire was used to assess medical consultants', managers', and nurses' attitudes and perceptions about electronic adverse incident reporting. Actual adverse incident reporting data were also analysed.FindingsThe main findings from this study are that consultants, managers, and nurses all had positive attitudes about responsibility for reporting adverse incidents. All respondents indicated that the design of and information collected by the electronic adverse incident reporting system (Datix) was adequate but consultants had more negative attitudes and perceptions than managers and nurses about Datix. All respondents expressed negative attitudes about the amount and type of feedback they receive from reporting, and consultants expressed more negative attitudes about how Datix is managed than managers and nurses. Analysis of adverse incident reporting data found that the proportion of consultants using Datix to report incidents was significantly lower than that of managers and nurses.Practical implicationsThe findings suggest that there are no additional barriers to incident reporting associated with the use of a bespoke electronic adverse incident reporting system as compared to other types of systems. Although an electronic adverse incident reporting system may be able to increase incident reporting and facilitate organisational learning by making it easier to report incidents and analyse incident reporting data, strong leadership within hospitals/healthcare professions (or healthcare subcultures) is still required in order to promote and sustain incident reporting to improve patient safety.Originality/valueThis is the first study to investigate attitudes toward and reporting behaviour on a bespoke electronic adverse incident reporting system in hospitals.
Title: Electronic adverse incident reporting in hospitals
Description:
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to assess attitudes toward and use of an electronic adverse incident reporting system in all four hospitals in one National Health Service Scotland Health Board area.
Design/methodology/approachA questionnaire was used to assess medical consultants', managers', and nurses' attitudes and perceptions about electronic adverse incident reporting.
Actual adverse incident reporting data were also analysed.
FindingsThe main findings from this study are that consultants, managers, and nurses all had positive attitudes about responsibility for reporting adverse incidents.
All respondents indicated that the design of and information collected by the electronic adverse incident reporting system (Datix) was adequate but consultants had more negative attitudes and perceptions than managers and nurses about Datix.
All respondents expressed negative attitudes about the amount and type of feedback they receive from reporting, and consultants expressed more negative attitudes about how Datix is managed than managers and nurses.
Analysis of adverse incident reporting data found that the proportion of consultants using Datix to report incidents was significantly lower than that of managers and nurses.
Practical implicationsThe findings suggest that there are no additional barriers to incident reporting associated with the use of a bespoke electronic adverse incident reporting system as compared to other types of systems.
Although an electronic adverse incident reporting system may be able to increase incident reporting and facilitate organisational learning by making it easier to report incidents and analyse incident reporting data, strong leadership within hospitals/healthcare professions (or healthcare subcultures) is still required in order to promote and sustain incident reporting to improve patient safety.
Originality/valueThis is the first study to investigate attitudes toward and reporting behaviour on a bespoke electronic adverse incident reporting system in hospitals.

Related Results

NURSES’ ATTITUDES TOWARD ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING BASED ON THE ROCAES SCALE: A CROSS-SECTIONAL SURVEY
NURSES’ ATTITUDES TOWARD ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING BASED ON THE ROCAES SCALE: A CROSS-SECTIONAL SURVEY
Introduction. Patient safety is widely recognized as a priority in modern healthcare systems. Reporting adverse events is an important mechanism for identifying weaknesses in healt...
Platonic Relations
Platonic Relations
The loop is one of the primary means of structuration for electronic music from mainstream to avant-garde styles. Indeed, during forums at the recent 2002 AD Analogue 2 Digital eve...
Market Shares for Rural Inpatient Surgical Services: Where Does the Buck Stop?
Market Shares for Rural Inpatient Surgical Services: Where Does the Buck Stop?
ABSTRACT:Utilization of surgical services by rural citizens is poorly understood, and few data are available about rural hospitals’surgical market shares and their financial implic...
Factors Inhibiting Incident Reportin Patient Safety
Factors Inhibiting Incident Reportin Patient Safety
Background: RSUD dr. H. Kumpulan Pane (RSKP) has not yet successfully implemented real-time incident reporting as stipulated by the Minister of Health Regulation No. 11 of 2017. Ob...
Impact of Nurse Staffing Mandates on Safety‐Net Hospitals: Lessons from California
Impact of Nurse Staffing Mandates on Safety‐Net Hospitals: Lessons from California
Context: California is the first and only state to implement a patient‐to‐nurse ratio mandate for hospitals. Increasing nurse staffing is an important organizational intervention f...

Back to Top