Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A single‐blind placebo‐controlled investigation into the analgesic effects of interferential currents on experimentally induced ischaemic pain in healthy subjects

View through CrossRef
The aim of this single‐blind placebo‐controlled study was to examine the analgesic effects of interferential currents (IFC) on experimentally induced ischaemic pain. Ischaemic pain was induced using the submaximal effort tourniquet technique (SETT) and pain intensity was recorded using a visual analogue scale at 1‐min intervals was used as the primary outcome measure. Following baseline recordings 30 healthy volunteers received either active IFC, sham IFC, or no treatment (10 subjects per group). Data were analysed by calculating the mean change in pain intensity at each 1‐min interval by subtracting data during treatment from the baseline data. IFC was administered throughout the duration of the ischaemic pain test via four electrodes (quadripolar application) on the forearm. Active IFC delivered electrical currents at a `strong but comfortable' intensity. A `dummy' stimulator that delivered no current was used as sham IFC. Subjects in the no treatment control group were informed that the IFC device was not switched on. There were significant effects for Groups (P=0·04) which were attributed to a significant reduction in pain intensity for the IFC group when compared with sham and no‐treatment control (P≤0·05). There were no significant effects for Time (P=0·69) or Group–Time interaction (P=0·45). In conclusion, IFC produced significantly greater analgesia than sham and no‐treatment control groups under the present experimental conditions.
Title: A single‐blind placebo‐controlled investigation into the analgesic effects of interferential currents on experimentally induced ischaemic pain in healthy subjects
Description:
The aim of this single‐blind placebo‐controlled study was to examine the analgesic effects of interferential currents (IFC) on experimentally induced ischaemic pain.
Ischaemic pain was induced using the submaximal effort tourniquet technique (SETT) and pain intensity was recorded using a visual analogue scale at 1‐min intervals was used as the primary outcome measure.
Following baseline recordings 30 healthy volunteers received either active IFC, sham IFC, or no treatment (10 subjects per group).
Data were analysed by calculating the mean change in pain intensity at each 1‐min interval by subtracting data during treatment from the baseline data.
IFC was administered throughout the duration of the ischaemic pain test via four electrodes (quadripolar application) on the forearm.
Active IFC delivered electrical currents at a `strong but comfortable' intensity.
A `dummy' stimulator that delivered no current was used as sham IFC.
Subjects in the no treatment control group were informed that the IFC device was not switched on.
There were significant effects for Groups (P=0·04) which were attributed to a significant reduction in pain intensity for the IFC group when compared with sham and no‐treatment control (P≤0·05).
There were no significant effects for Time (P=0·69) or Group–Time interaction (P=0·45).
In conclusion, IFC produced significantly greater analgesia than sham and no‐treatment control groups under the present experimental conditions.

Related Results

Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract Introduction Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Abstract Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex and often overlooked condition caused by the compression of neurovascular structures as they pass through the thoracic outlet. ...
Analgesic effects of adenosine in Syndrome X are counteracted by theophylline: a double-blind placebo-controlled study
Analgesic effects of adenosine in Syndrome X are counteracted by theophylline: a double-blind placebo-controlled study
It has been proposed that adenosine mediates ischaemic pain in humans. Patients with cardiac Syndrome X are hypersensitive to potential pain stimuli, including adenosine. On the ot...
[RETRACTED] Keanu Reeves CBD Gummies v1
[RETRACTED] Keanu Reeves CBD Gummies v1
[RETRACTED]Keanu Reeves CBD Gummies ==❱❱ Huge Discounts:[HURRY UP ] Absolute Keanu Reeves CBD Gummies (Available)Order Online Only!! ❰❰= https://www.facebook.com/Keanu-Reeves-CBD-G...
Verbally induced placebo effects on heat pain tolerance in preschool-aged children
Verbally induced placebo effects on heat pain tolerance in preschool-aged children
Abstract Unlike in adults and older children, placebo hypoalgesia has not been experimentally studied in preschool-aged children. Because of their cognitive devel...
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Given the rarity of chest wall hydatid disease, information on this condition is primarily drawn from case reports. Hence, this study systematically reviews t...

Back to Top