Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Rupture analysis of the 2020 Petrinja earthquake based on seismological observations

View through CrossRef
<p>Here, I use seismological observations (~70 broadband stations at distances between 100 and 400 km from the source) to characterize the rupture properties of the Petrinja mainshock (Mw 6.4). First, I perform a spectral analysis of the P-waves to compute the corner frequency. In order to remove the wave propagation effects and isolate the source properties, I use the largest foreshocks and aftershocks (Mw>4) as empirical Green’s functions (EGFs). Assuming a Brune’s source model, the obtained stress drop is ~20 MPa. This rather large value is in agreement with the short rupture length of ~8 km inferred by InSAR data (Ganas et al. 2021). In addition, the weak azimuthal variations of the corner frequencies indicates a bilateral rupture, that is a rupture nucleating close to the fault center. Second, I compute the apparent source time functions (i.e. the source time functions “seen” from any station) using an EGF deconvolution approach. The results indicate an average rupture duration of 5-6 s with weak azimuthal variation of the apparent rupture duration, in agreement with the spectral analysis. Finally, I perform a Bayesian inversion of the apparent source function, in order to obtain a kinematic model of the rupture propagation (slip distribution, rupture velocity). The preliminary results reveal a slow velocity of the rupture propagation. Such a slow rupture velocity associated with a large stress drop has been observed on other faults with slow slip rates (e.g. Causse et al. 2017). This work provides insight on the rupture process of this major event on a poorly documented fault. I am fully open for collaborations to further develop and enrich this study.</p><p><br><strong>References</strong><br>Causse, M., G. Cultrera, L. Moreau, A. Herrero, E. Schiapappietra and F. Courboulex. Bayesian rupture imaging in a complex medium. The 29 May 2012 Emilia, Northern Italy, earthquake (2017), Geophysical Research Letters, DOI : 10.1002/2017GL074698.<br>Ganas, A., Elias, P., Valkaniotis, S., Tsironi, V., Karasante, I., Briole, P., 2021, Petrinja earthquake moved crust 10 feet, Temblor, http://doi.org/10.32858/temblor.156</p>
Copernicus GmbH
Title: Rupture analysis of the 2020 Petrinja earthquake based on seismological observations
Description:
<p>Here, I use seismological observations (~70 broadband stations at distances between 100 and 400 km from the source) to characterize the rupture properties of the Petrinja mainshock (Mw 6.
4).
First, I perform a spectral analysis of the P-waves to compute the corner frequency.
In order to remove the wave propagation effects and isolate the source properties, I use the largest foreshocks and aftershocks (Mw>4) as empirical Green’s functions (EGFs).
Assuming a Brune’s source model, the obtained stress drop is ~20 MPa.
This rather large value is in agreement with the short rupture length of ~8 km inferred by InSAR data (Ganas et al.
2021).
In addition, the weak azimuthal variations of the corner frequencies indicates a bilateral rupture, that is a rupture nucleating close to the fault center.
Second, I compute the apparent source time functions (i.
e.
the source time functions “seen” from any station) using an EGF deconvolution approach.
The results indicate an average rupture duration of 5-6 s with weak azimuthal variation of the apparent rupture duration, in agreement with the spectral analysis.
Finally, I perform a Bayesian inversion of the apparent source function, in order to obtain a kinematic model of the rupture propagation (slip distribution, rupture velocity).
The preliminary results reveal a slow velocity of the rupture propagation.
Such a slow rupture velocity associated with a large stress drop has been observed on other faults with slow slip rates (e.
g.
Causse et al.
2017).
This work provides insight on the rupture process of this major event on a poorly documented fault.
I am fully open for collaborations to further develop and enrich this study.
</p><p><br><strong>References</strong><br>Causse, M.
, G.
Cultrera, L.
Moreau, A.
Herrero, E.
Schiapappietra and F.
Courboulex.
Bayesian rupture imaging in a complex medium.
The 29 May 2012 Emilia, Northern Italy, earthquake (2017), Geophysical Research Letters, DOI : 10.
1002/2017GL074698.
<br>Ganas, A.
, Elias, P.
, Valkaniotis, S.
, Tsironi, V.
, Karasante, I.
, Briole, P.
, 2021, Petrinja earthquake moved crust 10 feet, Temblor, http://doi.
org/10.
32858/temblor.
156</p>.

Related Results

Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct Introduction Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Impact and Insights from the 2020 Petrinja Earthquake
Impact and Insights from the 2020 Petrinja Earthquake
The ML 6.2 Petrinja earthquake, which struck on December 29, 2020, is one of the most significant continental earthquakes in central Europe in recent years, following previous majo...
Application of apparent strong earthquake activity pattern in operational earthquake forecasting
Application of apparent strong earthquake activity pattern in operational earthquake forecasting
Abstract Consulting the Catalogue of the International Seismological Centre (ISC), for the period 1904–2016 to detect the occurrence of potentially damaging earthquakes we ...
Analysis of maxillofacial fracture victims in the Wenchuan earthquake and Yushu earthquake
Analysis of maxillofacial fracture victims in the Wenchuan earthquake and Yushu earthquake
Abstract –  Objective: To analyze retrospectively 419 patients after the Wenchuan earthquake and 46 after Yushu earthquake with maxillofacial fractures so as to provide reference o...
Estimation of earthquake size for seismic hazards
Estimation of earthquake size for seismic hazards
Abstract This chapter presents a structured organization of the various types of seismic-hazard estimates, approaches, scaling parameters, techniques, and data used ...
Detect and characterize swarm-like seismicity
Detect and characterize swarm-like seismicity
Tectonic earthquake swarms exhibit a distinct temporal and spatial pattern compared to mainshock-aftershock sequences. Unlike the latter ones, where the earthquake sequence typical...

Back to Top