Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparison between drainage and curettage in the treatment of acute pilonidal abscess
View through CrossRef
OBJECTIVE: Simple incision and drainage of a sacrococcygeal pilonidal abscess is associated with more than 40% recurrence. Definitive treatment of the chronic pilonidal sinus is recommended 4-8 weeks after incision and drainage. The present prospective clinical trial study was designed to compare the curettage and drainage of the acute abscess of the pilonidal sinus. Hospital stay, wound healing, and recurrence were noted. METHODS: This study was performed in Kerman University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Iran from March 1999 to May 2004. One hundred and fifty patients who had an acute sacrococcygeal pilonidal abscess were randomly assigned to receive one of 2 drainage or curettage surgical procedures. All the surgical wounds were laid open, and daily sitting in a warm tub together with douche was recommended postoperatively. The 2 treatment modalities were compared in terms of the wound healing period, hospital stay, and postoperative complications using Chi-square and Student-t test. Patients with completed wound repair, consisting of 72 subjects in the curettage and 59 subjects in the drainage groups, were followed up to 65 months for the detection of recurrence by means of life table and Gehan s generalized Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: Most patients spent only one day in the hospital, with initial healing occurring in <2 months. Healing process in the curettage cases occurred more quickly than the drainage patients (96% versus 78.7%, p<0.001). In all cases, the treatment relieved symptoms, and all the patients returned to work 7-10 days after the treatment. Three patients in the curettage group (4%) and 16 patients in the drainage group (21.3%) did not complete wound healing within 10 weeks (p<0.001). Recurrence of disease was encountered significantly less in the curettage subjects than the drainage ones (11% versus 42%) (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Unroofing and curettage, which is associated with higher rates of healing and lower rates of recurrence, may be the treatment of choice in the acute pilonidal abscess.
Armed Forces Medical Services
Title: Comparison between drainage and curettage in the treatment of acute pilonidal abscess
Description:
OBJECTIVE: Simple incision and drainage of a sacrococcygeal pilonidal abscess is associated with more than 40% recurrence.
Definitive treatment of the chronic pilonidal sinus is recommended 4-8 weeks after incision and drainage.
The present prospective clinical trial study was designed to compare the curettage and drainage of the acute abscess of the pilonidal sinus.
Hospital stay, wound healing, and recurrence were noted.
METHODS: This study was performed in Kerman University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Iran from March 1999 to May 2004.
One hundred and fifty patients who had an acute sacrococcygeal pilonidal abscess were randomly assigned to receive one of 2 drainage or curettage surgical procedures.
All the surgical wounds were laid open, and daily sitting in a warm tub together with douche was recommended postoperatively.
The 2 treatment modalities were compared in terms of the wound healing period, hospital stay, and postoperative complications using Chi-square and Student-t test.
Patients with completed wound repair, consisting of 72 subjects in the curettage and 59 subjects in the drainage groups, were followed up to 65 months for the detection of recurrence by means of life table and Gehan s generalized Wilcoxon test.
RESULTS: Most patients spent only one day in the hospital, with initial healing occurring in <2 months.
Healing process in the curettage cases occurred more quickly than the drainage patients (96% versus 78.
7%, p<0.
001).
In all cases, the treatment relieved symptoms, and all the patients returned to work 7-10 days after the treatment.
Three patients in the curettage group (4%) and 16 patients in the drainage group (21.
3%) did not complete wound healing within 10 weeks (p<0.
001).
Recurrence of disease was encountered significantly less in the curettage subjects than the drainage ones (11% versus 42%) (p<0.
001).
CONCLUSION: Unroofing and curettage, which is associated with higher rates of healing and lower rates of recurrence, may be the treatment of choice in the acute pilonidal abscess.
Related Results
Pediatric Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Single-Center Cohort Study of Clinical and Surgical Outcomes
Pediatric Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Single-Center Cohort Study of Clinical and Surgical Outcomes
Abstract
Introduction:Â Pilonidal sinus disease is increasingly recognized in the pediatric population, yet evidence on its clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes in childre...
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...
Clinical Profile and Surgical Outcomes of Pediatric Umbilical Pilonidal Sinus
Clinical Profile and Surgical Outcomes of Pediatric Umbilical Pilonidal Sinus
Abstract
Introduction
Umbilical pilonidal sinus (UPS) is a rare form of pilonidal disease (PNS) predominantly affecting young individuals. Owing to its low incidence, data on risk ...
Suture-Induced Tubo-Ovarian Abscess: A Case Report with Literature Review
Suture-Induced Tubo-Ovarian Abscess: A Case Report with Literature Review
Abstract
Introduction
Suture is an underreported cause for tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA) that can cause significant morbidity. This report describes a case of TOA arising from a silk ...
Comparison of Outcome after Open Pilonidal Sinus Treatment Versus Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment (EPSIT)
Comparison of Outcome after Open Pilonidal Sinus Treatment Versus Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment (EPSIT)
Objective: To compare the complications among open pilonidal sinus treatment versus endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT).
Study Design: Comparative Cross-sectional Study.
P...
Histopathological Examination and Endoscopic Sinusectomy: Is It Possible?
Histopathological Examination and Endoscopic Sinusectomy: Is It Possible?
IntroductionAlthough carcinomatous degeneration is a rare occurrence, some authors support the need for a histopathological examination after pilonidal cyst excision. Today, minima...
RADICAL VERSUS CONSERVATIVE METHODS IN ONE-STAGE PILONIDAL ABSCESS SURGERY: THE EXPERIENCE OF A TUNISIAN CENTER
RADICAL VERSUS CONSERVATIVE METHODS IN ONE-STAGE PILONIDAL ABSCESS SURGERY: THE EXPERIENCE OF A TUNISIAN CENTER
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment for pilonidal abscess is the gold standard, but not yet well codified. Different techniques proposed can be conservative or radical. AIMS:...
Adaptation of storm sewer systems to climate change
Adaptation of storm sewer systems to climate change
According to the United Nations (2017), more than the half of the world’s population lives in urban and semi-urban areas. As a result, urban areas are becoming larger, denser and m...

