Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Beginnings of Astrobiology

View through CrossRef
With the present surge of interest in astrobiology and its emergence as a new scientific discipline in its own right, the role of a celebrated pioneer is all too often forgotten. There can be little doubt that the late Sir Fred Hoyle played a key part in relating astronomical phenomena to questions of life. One of his first contributions in this area was his introduction of the so-called anthropic principle to astronomy. By the late 1940's astronomers had worked out how the simplest chemical element Hydrogen could be converted into Helium in stars, thus providing the main energy source by which stars shine. The building of nuclei beyond Helium by stellar nuclear processes appeared difficult at the time because of instabilities in nuclei with atomic masses 5 and 8. Hoyle had the grand vision of making most if not all of the elements in the Periodic Table in stars. In the early 1950's Hoyle argued that by the very fact of our existence, the existence of life, the element Carbon had to be synthesised in quantity in stars. This could not happen, Hoyle concluded, unless the nucleus of Carbon possessed an energy level corresponding to a hitherto unknown excited state which he was able to calculate. This was necessary so that three Helium nuclei could combine first to form a Carbon nucleus in the excited state that subsequently decayed into the ground state. One of the major triumphs of Hoyle's Anthropic Principle was that his predicted excited state was subsequently discovered in the laboratory by Ward Whaling and Willy Fowler at Caltech. This discovery opened the door to a brand new discipline of Nuclear Astrophysics. In a seminal paper published in 1957, Hoyle together with Willy Fowler, Geoffrey and Margaret Burbidge showed that all the chemical elements needed for life C, N, O, P, Mg, Fe, S … were made in stars. In a sense Hoyle's work in 1957 already provided the foundation stone for astrobiology. He showed that in essence we were made of stardust.
Title: The Beginnings of Astrobiology
Description:
With the present surge of interest in astrobiology and its emergence as a new scientific discipline in its own right, the role of a celebrated pioneer is all too often forgotten.
There can be little doubt that the late Sir Fred Hoyle played a key part in relating astronomical phenomena to questions of life.
One of his first contributions in this area was his introduction of the so-called anthropic principle to astronomy.
By the late 1940's astronomers had worked out how the simplest chemical element Hydrogen could be converted into Helium in stars, thus providing the main energy source by which stars shine.
The building of nuclei beyond Helium by stellar nuclear processes appeared difficult at the time because of instabilities in nuclei with atomic masses 5 and 8.
Hoyle had the grand vision of making most if not all of the elements in the Periodic Table in stars.
In the early 1950's Hoyle argued that by the very fact of our existence, the existence of life, the element Carbon had to be synthesised in quantity in stars.
This could not happen, Hoyle concluded, unless the nucleus of Carbon possessed an energy level corresponding to a hitherto unknown excited state which he was able to calculate.
This was necessary so that three Helium nuclei could combine first to form a Carbon nucleus in the excited state that subsequently decayed into the ground state.
One of the major triumphs of Hoyle's Anthropic Principle was that his predicted excited state was subsequently discovered in the laboratory by Ward Whaling and Willy Fowler at Caltech.
This discovery opened the door to a brand new discipline of Nuclear Astrophysics.
In a seminal paper published in 1957, Hoyle together with Willy Fowler, Geoffrey and Margaret Burbidge showed that all the chemical elements needed for life C, N, O, P, Mg, Fe, S … were made in stars.
In a sense Hoyle's work in 1957 already provided the foundation stone for astrobiology.
He showed that in essence we were made of stardust.

Related Results

Astrobiology impression survey for public in Japan
Astrobiology impression survey for public in Japan
Astrobiology, an interdisciplinary field, is gaining attention from astronomers. While Astronomy and Biology are well-recognized research fields in Japan, there have been no previo...
The Case for a Mission to Return Cloud Particles from the Lower Atmosphere of Venus
The Case for a Mission to Return Cloud Particles from the Lower Atmosphere of Venus
<p>The possibility of life in the lower Venusian atmosphere has been given serious scientific consideration for many decades (Sagan, 1961; Cockell, 1999; Grinspoon, 1...
Philosophy and data in astrobiology
Philosophy and data in astrobiology
AbstractCreating a unified model of life in the universe – history, extent and future – requires both scientific and humanities research. One way that humanities can contribute is ...
Astrobiology in Europe, 20 years of expectations
Astrobiology in Europe, 20 years of expectations
AbstractDuring 20 years, the European astrobiologists collaborated within EANA, the European Astrobiology Network Association, to help European researchers developing astrobiology ...
ExoMars/Rosalind Franklin Mission Update
ExoMars/Rosalind Franklin Mission Update
Finding signs of life elsewhere is one of the most important scientific objectives of our time.From the very beginning in 2002, ExoMars was conceived to answer one question:&#1...
Is There Life on Mars? Studying the Context of Uncertainty in Astrobiology
Is There Life on Mars? Studying the Context of Uncertainty in Astrobiology
While science is often portrayed as producing reliable knowledge, scientists tend to express caution about their claims, acknowledging nuances and doubt, all the more so in novel d...
The International Journal of Astrobiology
The International Journal of Astrobiology
The launch of a new journal is appropriately like a space mission. It is the result of a scientific need, the inspiration of a group of committed scientists and technologists, a ...

Back to Top