Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Uncertainty quantification in Bayesian inverse problems with model and data dimension reduction

View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT The prediction of rock properties in the subsurface from geophysical data generally requires the solution of a mathematical inverse problem. Because of the large size of geophysical (seismic) data sets and subsurface models, it is common to reduce the dimension of the problem by applying dimension reduction methods and considering a reparameterization of the model and/or the data. Especially for high-dimensional nonlinear inverse problems, in which the analytical solution of the problem is not available in a closed form and iterative sampling or optimization methods must be applied to approximate the solution, model and/or data reduction reduce the computational cost of the inversion. However, part of the information in the data or in the model can be lost by working in the reduced model and/or data space. We have focused on the uncertainty quantification in the solution of the inverse problem with data and/or model order reduction. We operate in a Bayesian setting for the inversion and uncertainty quantification and validate the proposed approach in the linear case, in which the posterior distribution of the model variables can be analytically written and the uncertainty of the model predictions can be exactly assessed. To quantify the changes in the uncertainty in the inverse problem in the reduced space, we compare the uncertainty in the solution with and without data and/or model reduction. We then extend the approach to nonlinear inverse problems in which the solution is computed using an ensemble-based method. Examples of applications to linearized acoustic and nonlinear elastic inversion allow quantifying the impact of the application of reduction methods to model and data vectors on the uncertainty of inverse problem solutions. Examples of applications to linearized acoustic and nonlinear elastic inversion are shown.
Title: Uncertainty quantification in Bayesian inverse problems with model and data dimension reduction
Description:
ABSTRACT The prediction of rock properties in the subsurface from geophysical data generally requires the solution of a mathematical inverse problem.
Because of the large size of geophysical (seismic) data sets and subsurface models, it is common to reduce the dimension of the problem by applying dimension reduction methods and considering a reparameterization of the model and/or the data.
Especially for high-dimensional nonlinear inverse problems, in which the analytical solution of the problem is not available in a closed form and iterative sampling or optimization methods must be applied to approximate the solution, model and/or data reduction reduce the computational cost of the inversion.
However, part of the information in the data or in the model can be lost by working in the reduced model and/or data space.
We have focused on the uncertainty quantification in the solution of the inverse problem with data and/or model order reduction.
We operate in a Bayesian setting for the inversion and uncertainty quantification and validate the proposed approach in the linear case, in which the posterior distribution of the model variables can be analytically written and the uncertainty of the model predictions can be exactly assessed.
To quantify the changes in the uncertainty in the inverse problem in the reduced space, we compare the uncertainty in the solution with and without data and/or model reduction.
We then extend the approach to nonlinear inverse problems in which the solution is computed using an ensemble-based method.
Examples of applications to linearized acoustic and nonlinear elastic inversion allow quantifying the impact of the application of reduction methods to model and data vectors on the uncertainty of inverse problem solutions.
Examples of applications to linearized acoustic and nonlinear elastic inversion are shown.

Related Results

New Perspectives for 3D Visualization of Dynamic Reservoir Uncertainty
New Perspectives for 3D Visualization of Dynamic Reservoir Uncertainty
This reference is for an abstract only. A full paper was not submitted for this conference. Abstract 1 Int...
Reserves Uncertainty Calculation Accounting for Parameter Uncertainty
Reserves Uncertainty Calculation Accounting for Parameter Uncertainty
Abstract An important goal of geostatistical modeling is to assess output uncertainty after processing realizations through a transfer function, in particular, to...
Sample-efficient Optimization Using Neural Networks
Sample-efficient Optimization Using Neural Networks
<p>The solution to many science and engineering problems includes identifying the minimum or maximum of an unknown continuous function whose evaluation inflicts non-negligibl...
The uncertainty–investment relationship: scrutinizing the role of firm size
The uncertainty–investment relationship: scrutinizing the role of firm size
PurposeThe objective of this paper is threefold. First, it aims to empirically study whether firm-specific/idiosyncratic uncertainty, macroeconomic/aggregate uncertainty and politi...
Inverse Jacobian and related topics for certain superelliptic curves
Inverse Jacobian and related topics for certain superelliptic curves
Given an elliptic curve E over the complex numbers (CC) given by y^2 = x^3 + ax + b, there exists a lattice L in CC such that the group E(CC) of complex points on E is isomorphic ...
Figs S1-S9
Figs S1-S9
Fig. S1. Consensus phylogram (50 % majority rule) resulting from a Bayesian analysis of the ITS sequence alignment of sequences generated in this study and reference sequences from...
Integrated Foundation and Structural Reliability Analysis of a North Sea Structure
Integrated Foundation and Structural Reliability Analysis of a North Sea Structure
ABSTRACT In cases where the reliability of fixed offshore structures in extreme storms is influenced by both structural and foundation failure, appropriate interp...
Coupling Bayesian Inversion and Reduced-Order Modeling: Application to Lithosphere–Asthenosphere Boundary Estimation
Coupling Bayesian Inversion and Reduced-Order Modeling: Application to Lithosphere–Asthenosphere Boundary Estimation
Geophysical inverse problems are inherently ill-posed due to sparse, noisy, and indirect observations, making Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) a fundamental requirement for reliable...

Back to Top