Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Orwell and Bertrand Russell
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Two of the great Englishmen of the twentieth century, George Orwell and Bertrand Russell, were mutual admirers and sympathetic collaborators. That Orwell was familiar with and thought highly of Russell’s work is well known, yet a pervasive interpretation of Orwell as being scarcely capable of understanding philosophical monographs is persistent. Russell is a demonstrable influence on Orwell’s thought, although the full range of Russell’s influence has not always been appreciated, especially as it pertains to Orwell’s philosophical commitments. Russell’s views about power greatly influenced Orwell’s piqued interest in the topic during the 1940s, and Russell’s sympathies with British sentimentalism are discernible in Orwell’s own favoured moral psychology. There is also reason to think that Russell inspired a memorable passage in Nineteen Eighty-Four where Winston cannot recall the fallacy of which he suspects O’Brien is guilty: the unnamed fallacy likely has its origins in Russell’s critique of idealism.
Title: Orwell and Bertrand Russell
Description:
Abstract
Two of the great Englishmen of the twentieth century, George Orwell and Bertrand Russell, were mutual admirers and sympathetic collaborators.
That Orwell was familiar with and thought highly of Russell’s work is well known, yet a pervasive interpretation of Orwell as being scarcely capable of understanding philosophical monographs is persistent.
Russell is a demonstrable influence on Orwell’s thought, although the full range of Russell’s influence has not always been appreciated, especially as it pertains to Orwell’s philosophical commitments.
Russell’s views about power greatly influenced Orwell’s piqued interest in the topic during the 1940s, and Russell’s sympathies with British sentimentalism are discernible in Orwell’s own favoured moral psychology.
There is also reason to think that Russell inspired a memorable passage in Nineteen Eighty-Four where Winston cannot recall the fallacy of which he suspects O’Brien is guilty: the unnamed fallacy likely has its origins in Russell’s critique of idealism.
Related Results
Orwell and George Gissing
Orwell and George Gissing
Abstract
The Victorian novelist who meant the most to Orwell and who left the most profound impression on his own work was George Gissing. ‘Perhaps the best novelist...
Orwell and Modernism
Orwell and Modernism
Abstract
To consider how Orwell himself perceived, evaluated, and was influenced by those ‘highbrow’ writers who epitomized formal experimentalism in his lifetime, a...
Orwell and Charles Dickens
Orwell and Charles Dickens
Abstract
This chapter, a consideration of Dickens’s literary importance to Orwell, falls into four parts. The first considers some biographical evidence of Orwell’s ...
Orwell and Wyndham Lewis
Orwell and Wyndham Lewis
Abstract
This chapter explores the unexpected relationship between Wyndham Lewis and Orwell, who recognized in 1939 that Lewis had moved politically to the left. Str...
Orwell and Stupidity
Orwell and Stupidity
Abstract
Orwell used the term ‘stupidity’, and closely associated concepts such as ‘foolishness’ and ‘ignorance’, throughout his essays and novels as an idiosyncrati...
Orwell and Feminism
Orwell and Feminism
Abstract
The story of Orwell’s relationship with feminism reveals ties that are as strong, persistent, and productive as any he forged with other political movements...
Orwell and Henry Miller
Orwell and Henry Miller
Abstract
This chapter explores the conflicted relationship in print between Orwell and Henry Miller. It starts by examining the ways in which Miller is mostly rememb...
Orwell and Socialism
Orwell and Socialism
Abstract
Orwell is well known for an insistent heterodoxy, even while he suggests, in “Why I Write,” that “every line of [his] serious work [ … ] has been written [ ...

