Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Management in Dicamba-Resistant Cotton

View through CrossRef
Cotton growers rely heavily upon glufosinate and various residual herbicides applied preplant, PRE, and POST to control Palmer amaranth resistant to glyphosate and acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides. Recently deregulated in the United States, cotton resistant to dicamba, glufosinate, and glyphosate (B2XF cotton) offers a new platform for controlling herbicide-resistant Palmer amaranth. A field experiment was conducted in North Carolina and Georgia to determine B2XF cotton tolerance to dicamba, glufosinate, and glyphosate and to compare Palmer amaranth control by dicamba to a currently used, nondicamba program in both glufosinate- and glyphosate-based systems. Treatments consisted of glyphosate or glufosinate applied early POST (EPOST) and mid-POST (MPOST) in a factorial arrangement of treatments with seven dicamba options (no dicamba, PRE, EPOST, MPOST, PRE followed by [fb] EPOST, PRE fb MPOST, and EPOST fb MPOST) and a nondicamba standard. The nondicamba standard consisted of fomesafen PRE, pyrithiobac EPOST, and acetochlor MPOST. Dicamba caused no injury when applied PRE and only minor, transient injury when applied POST. At time of EPOST application, Palmer amaranth control by dicamba or fomesafen applied PRE, in combination with acetochlor, was similar and 13 to 17% greater than acetochlor alone. Dicamba was generally more effective on Palmer amaranth applied POST rather than PRE, and two applications were usually more effective than one. In glyphosate-based systems, greater Palmer amaranth control and cotton yield were obtained with dicamba applied EPOST, MPOST, or EPOST fb MPOST compared with the standard herbicides in North Carolina. In contrast, dicamba was no more effective than the standard herbicides in the glufosinate-based systems. In Georgia, dicamba was as effective as the standard herbicides in a glyphosate-based system only when dicamba was applied EPOST fb MPOST. In glufosinate-based systems in Georgia, dicamba was as effective as standard herbicides only when dicamba was applied twice.
Title: Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Management in Dicamba-Resistant Cotton
Description:
Cotton growers rely heavily upon glufosinate and various residual herbicides applied preplant, PRE, and POST to control Palmer amaranth resistant to glyphosate and acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides.
Recently deregulated in the United States, cotton resistant to dicamba, glufosinate, and glyphosate (B2XF cotton) offers a new platform for controlling herbicide-resistant Palmer amaranth.
A field experiment was conducted in North Carolina and Georgia to determine B2XF cotton tolerance to dicamba, glufosinate, and glyphosate and to compare Palmer amaranth control by dicamba to a currently used, nondicamba program in both glufosinate- and glyphosate-based systems.
Treatments consisted of glyphosate or glufosinate applied early POST (EPOST) and mid-POST (MPOST) in a factorial arrangement of treatments with seven dicamba options (no dicamba, PRE, EPOST, MPOST, PRE followed by [fb] EPOST, PRE fb MPOST, and EPOST fb MPOST) and a nondicamba standard.
The nondicamba standard consisted of fomesafen PRE, pyrithiobac EPOST, and acetochlor MPOST.
Dicamba caused no injury when applied PRE and only minor, transient injury when applied POST.
At time of EPOST application, Palmer amaranth control by dicamba or fomesafen applied PRE, in combination with acetochlor, was similar and 13 to 17% greater than acetochlor alone.
Dicamba was generally more effective on Palmer amaranth applied POST rather than PRE, and two applications were usually more effective than one.
In glyphosate-based systems, greater Palmer amaranth control and cotton yield were obtained with dicamba applied EPOST, MPOST, or EPOST fb MPOST compared with the standard herbicides in North Carolina.
In contrast, dicamba was no more effective than the standard herbicides in the glufosinate-based systems.
In Georgia, dicamba was as effective as the standard herbicides in a glyphosate-based system only when dicamba was applied EPOST fb MPOST.
In glufosinate-based systems in Georgia, dicamba was as effective as standard herbicides only when dicamba was applied twice.

Related Results

Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference and seed production in dry edible bean
Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference and seed production in dry edible bean
AbstractAlthough Palmer amaranth is currently not widespread in most dry edible bean−producing states in the United States, it is widespread in western Nebraska, a major dry edible...
Forage Legume Response to Dicamba and 2,4‐D Applications1
Forage Legume Response to Dicamba and 2,4‐D Applications1
AbstractWeed control options in pastures containing legumes are limited due to herbicide selectivity. A field study was conducted for 2 years in northeast Mississippi on a Leeper f...
Influence of timing of Palmer amaranth control in dicamba-resistant cotton on yield and economic return
Influence of timing of Palmer amaranth control in dicamba-resistant cotton on yield and economic return
AbstractGlyphosate-resistant (GR) Palmer amaranth continues to be challenging to control across the U.S. cotton belt. Timely application of POST herbicides and herbicides applied a...
Stewarding 2,4-D- and dicamba- based weed control technologies in cotton and soybean production systems
Stewarding 2,4-D- and dicamba- based weed control technologies in cotton and soybean production systems
Distinguishing 2,4-D and dicamba herbicide formulations in cotton and soybean tissue is challenging in regulation of crop injury from these herbicides. Additionally, stewardship of...
Horticultural crop response to synthetic auxins
Horticultural crop response to synthetic auxins
[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT REQUEST OF AUTHOR.] Rising adoption of dicamba-tolerant soybeans increases the potential exposure of grapes to dicamba, where of...
Palmer Amaranth Control by Glufosinate Depends on Application Time of Day
Palmer Amaranth Control by Glufosinate Depends on Application Time of Day
Glufosinate is used widely to control glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.) in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Previous research has shown weed control...
Transpiration response of palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) to drying soil in greenhouse conditions
Transpiration response of palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) to drying soil in greenhouse conditions
Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson) is a troublesome weed that can result in substantial crop yield loss in irrigated and rainfed agricultural systems of the U.S. Great ...

Back to Top