Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Modelling and Management of Annular Surface Blowouts - An SPDC Case Study
View through CrossRef
Abstract
This case study describes the planning and execution of a surface gas fire blowout control operation that resulted in re-entering, killing and abandoning a wellbore that was blowing out at the surface via the annuli "A and B" at an SPDC well blowout.
As part of the kill plan, simulations by use of the dynamic two-phase pipe flow simulator OLGA were performed. This paper presents the principles of the kill simulator and how the results were used in the design of the kill operation. A comparison with observed data and actual result are presented.
The challenges faced include, accessing the wellhead due to the raging gas fire, obsolete wellhead, vandalised wellhead entry points, and absence of top packer in the original completion are highlighted in this paper. The techniques and equipment employed, plus good teamwork, provided the necessary ingredients to divert the gas fire and gain access to the wellhead thus enabling killing, securing and partial abandonment of the well.
Introduction After a blowout, everyone wants to find the cause, prevent recurrence and understand how it was controlled. In-house papers/documentations may be written, measures are introduced to prevent another occurrence and be better prepared next time. In time, experience is lost as individuals leave and conditions become ripe for another blowout. Therefore, it is important to record, publicize, discuss and review case histories and past actions to learn about and prevent future disasters. Failure to use available information, not a lack of knowledge, usually causes and can certainly worsen disasters. This article is meant to disseminate information on an SPDC well blowout, analysis of causes, control methodology, etc., which will prove useful in educating and helping to avoid the disasters of blowout control in another well or region. Surface control operations are normally more difficult to develop due to the many possible blowout scenarios; potential escalation and unknown well response associated with intermediate control steps. For example:removing debris from Wellhead area;extinguishing fire;capping and diverting wellhead;shut-in and bullhead well dead ordynamically kill well.
At these points additional information is gained that guides the team to the course of action required to meet the next milestone (1).
Title: Modelling and Management of Annular Surface Blowouts - An SPDC Case Study
Description:
Abstract
This case study describes the planning and execution of a surface gas fire blowout control operation that resulted in re-entering, killing and abandoning a wellbore that was blowing out at the surface via the annuli "A and B" at an SPDC well blowout.
As part of the kill plan, simulations by use of the dynamic two-phase pipe flow simulator OLGA were performed.
This paper presents the principles of the kill simulator and how the results were used in the design of the kill operation.
A comparison with observed data and actual result are presented.
The challenges faced include, accessing the wellhead due to the raging gas fire, obsolete wellhead, vandalised wellhead entry points, and absence of top packer in the original completion are highlighted in this paper.
The techniques and equipment employed, plus good teamwork, provided the necessary ingredients to divert the gas fire and gain access to the wellhead thus enabling killing, securing and partial abandonment of the well.
Introduction After a blowout, everyone wants to find the cause, prevent recurrence and understand how it was controlled.
In-house papers/documentations may be written, measures are introduced to prevent another occurrence and be better prepared next time.
In time, experience is lost as individuals leave and conditions become ripe for another blowout.
Therefore, it is important to record, publicize, discuss and review case histories and past actions to learn about and prevent future disasters.
Failure to use available information, not a lack of knowledge, usually causes and can certainly worsen disasters.
This article is meant to disseminate information on an SPDC well blowout, analysis of causes, control methodology, etc.
, which will prove useful in educating and helping to avoid the disasters of blowout control in another well or region.
Surface control operations are normally more difficult to develop due to the many possible blowout scenarios; potential escalation and unknown well response associated with intermediate control steps.
For example:removing debris from Wellhead area;extinguishing fire;capping and diverting wellhead;shut-in and bullhead well dead ordynamically kill well.
At these points additional information is gained that guides the team to the course of action required to meet the next milestone (1).
Related Results
Quantum imaging with optical fibre structures
Quantum imaging with optical fibre structures
(English) Two-photon quantum correlations are a resource for quantum communication, sensing, and imaging. Coincidence-based quantum imaging leverages spatiotemporal quantum correla...
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Manifestations of Annular Ligament Injuries in Children With Monteggia Fractures
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Manifestations of Annular Ligament Injuries in Children With Monteggia Fractures
Background:
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly performed in children with elbow injuries to visualize soft tissues such as the annular ligament. Herein, we in...
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Integrated Production System Modeling in SPDC, Nigeria
Integrated Production System Modeling in SPDC, Nigeria
Abstract
As part of the Shell in-house simulation platform, the Hydrocarbon Field Planning Tool (HFPT) provides capabilities for the rigorous integrated subsurfac...
Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion and Mitral Annular Systolic Excursion: Correlation with Left Ventricular Diastolic Function
Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion and Mitral Annular Systolic Excursion: Correlation with Left Ventricular Diastolic Function
Introduction: Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and mitral annular systolic excursion are parameters used to assess the systolic function of the right ventricle and left v...
MISCONCEPTION OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF OIL COMPANIES ON THEIR HOST COMMUNITIES: A STUDY OF SHELL PETROLEUM DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND COMMUNITIES IN DELTA STATE, NIGERIA
MISCONCEPTION OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF OIL COMPANIES ON THEIR HOST COMMUNITIES: A STUDY OF SHELL PETROLEUM DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND COMMUNITIES IN DELTA STATE, NIGERIA
Over time, there has been a strained relationship between the residents of the Niger Delta region of Nigeria and the Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) due to the perceived...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
ASSESSMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS BY SHELL PETROLEUM DEVELOPMENT COMPANY IN EMPOWERING CLUSTER COMMUNITIES IN KOLOKUMA/OPOKUMA LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA OF BAYELSA STATE, NIGERIA
ASSESSMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS BY SHELL PETROLEUM DEVELOPMENT COMPANY IN EMPOWERING CLUSTER COMMUNITIES IN KOLOKUMA/OPOKUMA LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA OF BAYELSA STATE, NIGERIA
The study assessed community development projects available by Shell petroleum Development Company (SPDC) in empowering rural dwellers in Kolokuma/Opokuma Local Government Area of ...

