Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Prediction of RNA secondary structure based on helical regions distribution.

View through CrossRef
Abstract MOTIVATION: RNAs play an important role in many biological processes and knowing their structure is important in understanding their function. Due to difficulties in the experimental determination of RNA secondary structure, the methods of theoretical prediction for known sequences are often used. Although many different algorithms for such predictions have been developed, this problem has not yet been solved. It is thus necessary to develop new methods for predicting RNA secondary structure. The most-used at present is Zuker's algorithm which can be used to determine the minimum free energy secondary structure. However many RNA secondary structures verified by experiments are not consistent with the minimum free energy secondary structures. In order to solve this problem, a method used to search a group of secondary structures whose free energy is close to the global minimum free energy was developed by Zuker in 1989. When considering a group of secondary structures, if there is no experimental data, we cannot tell which one is better than the others. This case also occurs in combinatorial and heuristic methods. These two kinds of methods have several weaknesses. Here we show how the central limit theorem can be used to solve these problems. RESULTS: An algorithm for predicting RNA secondary structure based on helical regions distribution is presented, which can be used to find the most probable secondary structure for a given RNA sequence. It consists of three steps. First, list all possible helical regions. Second, according to central limit theorem, estimate the occurrence probability of every helical region based on the Monte Carlo simulation. Third, add the helical region with the biggest probability to the current structure and eliminate the helical regions incompatible with the current structure. The above processes can be repeated until no more helical regions can be added. Take the current structure as the final RNA secondary structure. In order to demonstrate the confidence of the program, a test on three RNA sequences: tRNAPhe, Pre-tRNATyr, and Tetrahymena ribosomal RNA intervening sequence, is performed. AVAILABILITY: The program is written in Turbo Pascal 7.0. The source code is available upon request. CONTACT: Wujj@nic.bmi.ac.cn or Liwj@mail.bmi.ac.cn
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: Prediction of RNA secondary structure based on helical regions distribution.
Description:
Abstract MOTIVATION: RNAs play an important role in many biological processes and knowing their structure is important in understanding their function.
Due to difficulties in the experimental determination of RNA secondary structure, the methods of theoretical prediction for known sequences are often used.
Although many different algorithms for such predictions have been developed, this problem has not yet been solved.
It is thus necessary to develop new methods for predicting RNA secondary structure.
The most-used at present is Zuker's algorithm which can be used to determine the minimum free energy secondary structure.
However many RNA secondary structures verified by experiments are not consistent with the minimum free energy secondary structures.
In order to solve this problem, a method used to search a group of secondary structures whose free energy is close to the global minimum free energy was developed by Zuker in 1989.
When considering a group of secondary structures, if there is no experimental data, we cannot tell which one is better than the others.
This case also occurs in combinatorial and heuristic methods.
These two kinds of methods have several weaknesses.
Here we show how the central limit theorem can be used to solve these problems.
RESULTS: An algorithm for predicting RNA secondary structure based on helical regions distribution is presented, which can be used to find the most probable secondary structure for a given RNA sequence.
It consists of three steps.
First, list all possible helical regions.
Second, according to central limit theorem, estimate the occurrence probability of every helical region based on the Monte Carlo simulation.
Third, add the helical region with the biggest probability to the current structure and eliminate the helical regions incompatible with the current structure.
The above processes can be repeated until no more helical regions can be added.
Take the current structure as the final RNA secondary structure.
In order to demonstrate the confidence of the program, a test on three RNA sequences: tRNAPhe, Pre-tRNATyr, and Tetrahymena ribosomal RNA intervening sequence, is performed.
AVAILABILITY: The program is written in Turbo Pascal 7.
The source code is available upon request.
CONTACT: Wujj@nic.
bmi.
ac.
cn or Liwj@mail.
bmi.
ac.
cn.

Related Results

B-247 BLADE-R: streamlined RNA extraction for clinical diagnostics and high-throughput applications
B-247 BLADE-R: streamlined RNA extraction for clinical diagnostics and high-throughput applications
Abstract Background Efficient nucleic acid extraction and purification are crucial for cellular and molecular biology research, ...
Abstract P1-05-23: Utilities and challenges of RNA-Seq based expression and variant calling in a clinical setting
Abstract P1-05-23: Utilities and challenges of RNA-Seq based expression and variant calling in a clinical setting
Abstract Introduction Variant calling based on DNA samples has been the gold standard of clinical testing since the advent of Sanger sequencing. The u...
Detection of Multiple Types of Cancer Driver Mutations Using Targeted RNA Sequencing in NSCLC
Detection of Multiple Types of Cancer Driver Mutations Using Targeted RNA Sequencing in NSCLC
ABSTRACTCurrently, DNA and RNA are used separately to capture different types of gene mutations. DNA is commonly used for the detection of SNVs, indels and CNVs; RNA is used for an...
Accurate in silico predictions of modified RNA interactions to a prototypical RNA-binding protein with λ-dynamics
Accurate in silico predictions of modified RNA interactions to a prototypical RNA-binding protein with λ-dynamics
RNA-binding proteins shape biology through their widespread functions in RNA biochemistry. Their function requires the recognition of specific RNA motifs for targeted binding. Thes...
Abstract 2323: Deciphering RNA degradation: Insights from a comparative analysis of paired fresh frozen/FFPE total RNA-seq
Abstract 2323: Deciphering RNA degradation: Insights from a comparative analysis of paired fresh frozen/FFPE total RNA-seq
Abstract Background: Fresh frozen (FF) and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples are primary resources for archival tissues in cancer studies. Despite the ...
Molecular Drivers of RNA Phase Separation
Molecular Drivers of RNA Phase Separation
AbstractRNA molecules are essential in orchestrating the assembly of biomolecular condensates and membraneless compartments in cells. Many condensates form via the association of R...
Accurate in silico predictions of modified RNA interactions to a prototypical RNA-binding protein with λ-dynamics
Accurate in silico predictions of modified RNA interactions to a prototypical RNA-binding protein with λ-dynamics
RNA-binding proteins shape biology through their widespread functions in RNA biochemistry. Their function requires the recognition of specific RNA motifs for targeted binding. Thes...
Probing helicity and the topological origins of helicity via non-local Hanbury-Brown and Twiss correlations
Probing helicity and the topological origins of helicity via non-local Hanbury-Brown and Twiss correlations
AbstractQuantum Hall edge modes are chiral while quantum spin Hall edge modes are helical. However, unlike chiral edge modes which always occur in topological systems, quasi-helica...

Back to Top