Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Patients’ gut feelings seem useful in primary care professionals’ decision making

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Family physicians’ diagnostic gut feelings have proved to be valuable. But what about patients’ gut feelings? Research has shown that patients’ gut feelings may contribute to their physicians’ clinical reasoning. Dutch medical tribunals consider patients’ worry useful for doctors’ diagnostic process. However, how general practitioners and other primary care professionals recognize gut feelings of patients and deal with them in their decision making is yet unclear. We aim to explore how primary care professionals perceive patients’ gut feelings and use this information in their decision-making. Methods We interviewed 30 Dutch and Belgian primary care professionals, exploring how they recognize and value patients’ gut feelings. We coded all interviews using a descriptive content analysis in an iterative process. Data sufficiency was achieved. Results Primary care professionals acknowledged gut feelings in their patients, and most participants found them a useful source of information. Patients’ gut feelings might alert them to possible hidden problems and might provide quicker insight into patients’ perceptions. Primary care professionals listed a whole series of wordings relating to trusting or distrusting the situation or to any changes in normal patterns. A patient’s gut feeling was often a reason for the professionals to explore patients’ worries and to reconsider their own clinical reasoning. Conclusions Primary care professionals regularly considered patients’ gut feelings useful, as they might contribute to their clinical reasoning and to a deeper understanding of the patient’s problem. The next step could be to ask patients themselves about their gut feelings and explore their diagnostic value.
Title: Patients’ gut feelings seem useful in primary care professionals’ decision making
Description:
Abstract Background Family physicians’ diagnostic gut feelings have proved to be valuable.
But what about patients’ gut feelings? Research has shown that patients’ gut feelings may contribute to their physicians’ clinical reasoning.
Dutch medical tribunals consider patients’ worry useful for doctors’ diagnostic process.
However, how general practitioners and other primary care professionals recognize gut feelings of patients and deal with them in their decision making is yet unclear.
We aim to explore how primary care professionals perceive patients’ gut feelings and use this information in their decision-making.
Methods We interviewed 30 Dutch and Belgian primary care professionals, exploring how they recognize and value patients’ gut feelings.
We coded all interviews using a descriptive content analysis in an iterative process.
Data sufficiency was achieved.
Results Primary care professionals acknowledged gut feelings in their patients, and most participants found them a useful source of information.
Patients’ gut feelings might alert them to possible hidden problems and might provide quicker insight into patients’ perceptions.
Primary care professionals listed a whole series of wordings relating to trusting or distrusting the situation or to any changes in normal patterns.
A patient’s gut feeling was often a reason for the professionals to explore patients’ worries and to reconsider their own clinical reasoning.
Conclusions Primary care professionals regularly considered patients’ gut feelings useful, as they might contribute to their clinical reasoning and to a deeper understanding of the patient’s problem.
The next step could be to ask patients themselves about their gut feelings and explore their diagnostic value.

Related Results

Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Organisatie van geestelijke gezondheidszorg voor mensen met een ernstige en persisterende mentale aandoening
Organisatie van geestelijke gezondheidszorg voor mensen met een ernstige en persisterende mentale aandoening
1 INTRODUCTION AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS 5 -- 2 GENERAL BACKGROUND: DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY 7 -- 2.1 CHRONIC AND COMPLEX MENTAL DISORDERS: DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE OF THE -- S...
Editorial for the special issue in Nordic Journal of Health Economics: Challenges in Nordic Primary Care
Editorial for the special issue in Nordic Journal of Health Economics: Challenges in Nordic Primary Care
Primary care in the Nordic countries have many similarities but are also different in crucial ways (Olsen et al. 2016). Among the similarities are that Nordic primary care is tax-b...
Towards more goal-oriented care through care coordination and care planning.
Towards more goal-oriented care through care coordination and care planning.
The increasing aging of our society is putting increasing pressure on the current organization of care and support. This moved the Flemish government to a thorough reform of primar...
Scrutinising gut feelings: emotional reflexive practices in Italian courts
Scrutinising gut feelings: emotional reflexive practices in Italian courts
Narratives are powerful emtional devices. They can trigger our curiosity and make us suspicious, compassionate, empathic or even horrified. In this article, I focus on how Italian ...
Kismet/CHD7/CHD8 affects gut biomechanics, the gut microbiome, and gut-brain axis in Drosophila melanogaster
Kismet/CHD7/CHD8 affects gut biomechanics, the gut microbiome, and gut-brain axis in Drosophila melanogaster
Abstract The gut-brain axis may contribute to the pathophysiology of neurodevelopmental disorders, yet it is often unclear how risk genes associa...

Back to Top